![]() |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
Would someone keeping watch have been able to warn the pilot of the large wake in time for him to change his angle of approach? Good question. I rode a tour boat (not the same one) in that area a few months ago. I remember a larger boat passing by us and the captain of OUR boat turned right into the wake until it had passed. I wondered what the point of that was, exactly. I guess I didn't realize while I was on the tour boat that tour boats are so easily capsized. -Dave |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
Red Cloud© wrote:
It's a halfway measure. OUTLAW TOUR BOATS AND RECREATIONAL BOATS NOW!!! rusty redcloud Good idea Rusty! We have four or five of these monsters polluting our downtown trying to entice guillable tourists for a land/sea sightseeing trip. http://www.harbourhopper.com/main.html# |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:02:52 GMT, OlBlueEyes wrote:
"Netsock" wrote in : Why would a state, require auto restraints, but allow bike riders to go helmetless? Strengthening the gene pool. The fact that motorcyclists who *don't* wear a helmet are mentally imbalanced greatly supports your assertion. -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:39:47 GMT, "Eisboch"
wrote: thunder wrote in message ... On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:05:33 +0000, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: I will be the first to admit that my opinion is strictly based on my own experiences over 50 some years of owning and operating boats - then again, sometimes that's all we have to go by. That's enough. Look, safety devices are great ideas, I'm all for using them. I just question the law part of it. I'm always amazed when I drive through Connecticut, how many bikers don't wear helmets. I'm always thinking dumbass, but it is their life, not mine. I ride and I personally don't like wearing a helmet. I've heard all the arguments and statistics from both sides of the fence - that helmets have little or no effect on motorcycle fatalites to how helmets save thousands of lives. Either way, I still don't like 'em, but wear one when required. In MA they are required. Contrary to popular belief, Florida *does* have a helmet law but you are permitted to ride without one if you carry proof that you have personal medical insurance. Eisboch Put on a helmet. Have someone hit you up side the head with a baseball bat. Then take the helmet off, and have the person repeat the stroke. If you can't tell the difference, then you don't need a helmet! -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
PocoLoco wrote in message ... Put on a helmet. Have someone hit you up side the head with a baseball bat. Then take the helmet off, and have the person repeat the stroke. If you can't tell the difference, then you don't need a helmet! -- John H Ok. I'll try i ...... WAIT A SECOND! ..... you trying to fool me????? Eisboch |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:02:54 GMT, "Eisboch"
wrote: PocoLoco wrote in message .. . Put on a helmet. Have someone hit you up side the head with a baseball bat. Then take the helmet off, and have the person repeat the stroke. If you can't tell the difference, then you don't need a helmet! -- John H Ok. I'll try i ...... WAIT A SECOND! ..... you trying to fool me????? Eisboch As an MSF instructor, that's what I'd tell my students. I swear, I think a couple actually tried it! -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
|
Coming To A Boat Near You?
OlBlueEyes wrote:
Don White wrote in : Should be a 'federal' regulation. That way a tourist could expect a bare minimum of protection wherever they go. Everything the 9/11 hijackers carried onboard was legal. So much for federal regulations providing "a bare minimum of protection". It amazes me how many people who have utter contempt for George Bush or Ted Kennedy want THEM dictating what we must wear on a tour boat. Well, I certainly wouldn't want to have Ted Kennedy in charge of my own safety on or near a body of water. OTOH, I wouldn't want Shrub in charge of my safety under ANY circumstances. -- Get Credit Where Credit Is Due http://www.cardreport.com/ Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:10:56 -0700, Antipodean Bucket Farmer
wrote: OlBlueEyes wrote: Don White wrote in : Should be a 'federal' regulation. That way a tourist could expect a bare minimum of protection wherever they go. Everything the 9/11 hijackers carried onboard was legal. So much for federal regulations providing "a bare minimum of protection". It amazes me how many people who have utter contempt for George Bush or Ted Kennedy want THEM dictating what we must wear on a tour boat. Well, I certainly wouldn't want to have Ted Kennedy in charge of my own safety on or near a body of water. OTOH, I wouldn't want Shrub in charge of my safety under ANY circumstances. What d you mean? He's already proved he's willing to take a pretzel for the team! |
Coming To A Boat Near You?
"Don White" wrote in message ... Larry Bud wrote: Should be a 'federal' regulation. That way a tourist could expect a bare minimum of protection wherever they go. Who's preventing a tourist from wearing a life jacket when they go on a boat? Not just the life jacket... how about regulating/inspecting the tour boat/captain. They are. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com