wrote:

I have done nothing to deserve the non-stop flaming this individual
began with his "open letter" thread and has continued ever since.

After Skipper left the NG you flamed him at every mention. You KNEW he
had over 50 years of boating experience and yet you called him a
"non-boater". That alone would be justification for most, but you went
further, placing him as the butt of your jokes with acquaintances over
beers. Skipper has plenty of cause for setting the record straight about
your integrity and honesty.

Are you now stating the conversations you had with Skipper about AIMS
did not happen?

Only a sick ******* takes up stalking a person from thread to thread to
lob disruptive insults. This character is surely not the first to pull
this nonsense in the NG, and probably won't be the last.

Why are you avoiding an open discussion about AIMS? Could it be because
that would show you in an unflattering light?

I can't imagine why.

I can, let's discuss and let the NG decide.

Here in the NG, we should discuss things posted to the NG. Not things
that one side of a private conversation changes the story after five
years or so and now claims were said.

We have some pretty smart participants in this NG. I think their powers
of perception can detect truth. Subjects need not be limited to only
what has been previously posted to this NG.

That said, I believe it has become all too obvious that you have no
intention of discussing AIMS, your role with that "marine research
operation", or your previous statements about that company. I believe
most NG readers also know the reason why.

For example: (the following incident never occured)...suppose I
suddenly appeared in the group to report, "When Skipper was last in
Seattle, he kept asking me if I knew anything about the Broadway
District. He said he had heard that it was a great place to pick up
underage boys willing to go down on fat old men for a little quick
spending cash. He reached in his pocket and pulled out a paper that
said, "For a good time, call so and so....." (etc, etc, you get the
point).....

As I've stated previously, you are truly a class act, Chucky.

Psuedo, what the same crazy heck would be the point of arguing about
that conversation in the NG? First, it was a private conversation
between you and me. Second, with a total lack of evidence available on
either side the "discussion" you call for would devolve into you
said/did not you said/did not you said/did not etc.

You sound like the typical used car salesman, Chucky. The point of
discussing AIMS and our previous conversations about it would be to
illuminate you and your conduct. Readers can and will come to their own
conclusions.

If you think its suddenly your role in life to challenge my ethics,
then do so with some incident or statement that is known to others in
the NG- not a "Gould said this, and in spite of my previous statements
to the contrary you'll now have to take my word for it..." bag of BS.

I'm challenging your conduct precisely BECAUSE of your conduct. I did
not insult and belittle you during my absence, you however did.

The only real record I have of anything Skipper or I said during or
about our meetings is the statement posted some time after our 2nd
meeting in Seattle.
Let's see, how does that go again....oh, yeah.......

JD's Survey Not so Powerful - Chuck is an honest broker. Had I used him
as my representative for a boat I'd seen before contacting him, he would
have saved us ... rec.boats - Oct 26 2001, 9:35 am by Skipper - 65
messages - 15 authors

That repeated snippet seems a bit like the refuge of a scoundrel to me.
I HAVE explained those comments.

GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).

You really are a class act, Chucky.

--
Skipper

*JimH* wrote:

GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).

I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.

As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies. You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.

But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.

Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.

PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for your
lies about me.

Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper

"Skipper" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:

GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).

I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.

As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies. You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.

But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.

Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of
writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for your
lies about me.

Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper

While away over the past week I was able to stumble upon a new piece of
software used by national and international police and security
organizations including the FBI, CIA, Interpol and KGB. The software is
able to show a physical image of a person once a variety of personality
traits and other characteristics/known facts are entered about the person in
question.



I played with the software to see if it really works.


Here are my results:





Traits: Brutal, rape room, inhuman, dictator, murderer, cold blooded,
torture chamber, Anti-Christ



Result: http://tinyurl.com/7chfb





Traits: Charming, beautiful, stunning, extraordinary talent, film star,
royalty.



Results: http://tinyurl.com/bffps



http://tinyurl.com/bgrua





Traits: Liar, unethical, egotistical, ultra liberal, coward



Result: http://tinyurl.com/b9z6z






The software really is amazingly accurate!

Skipper,
From what I can tell from your posts, you are suggesting Gould recommended
donating a boat to Charity for tax purposes, which is neither illegal or
immoral.


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
wrote:

I have done nothing to deserve the non-stop flaming this individual
began with his "open letter" thread and has continued ever since.

After Skipper left the NG you flamed him at every mention. You KNEW he
had over 50 years of boating experience and yet you called him a
"non-boater". That alone would be justification for most, but you went
further, placing him as the butt of your jokes with acquaintances over
beers. Skipper has plenty of cause for setting the record straight about
your integrity and honesty.

Are you now stating the conversations you had with Skipper about AIMS
did not happen?

Only a sick ******* takes up stalking a person from thread to thread to
lob disruptive insults. This character is surely not the first to pull
this nonsense in the NG, and probably won't be the last.

Why are you avoiding an open discussion about AIMS? Could it be because
that would show you in an unflattering light?

I can't imagine why.

I can, let's discuss and let the NG decide.

Here in the NG, we should discuss things posted to the NG. Not things
that one side of a private conversation changes the story after five
years or so and now claims were said.

We have some pretty smart participants in this NG. I think their powers
of perception can detect truth. Subjects need not be limited to only
what has been previously posted to this NG.

That said, I believe it has become all too obvious that you have no
intention of discussing AIMS, your role with that "marine research
operation", or your previous statements about that company. I believe
most NG readers also know the reason why.

For example: (the following incident never occured)...suppose I
suddenly appeared in the group to report, "When Skipper was last in
Seattle, he kept asking me if I knew anything about the Broadway
District. He said he had heard that it was a great place to pick up
underage boys willing to go down on fat old men for a little quick
spending cash. He reached in his pocket and pulled out a paper that
said, "For a good time, call so and so....." (etc, etc, you get the
point).....

As I've stated previously, you are truly a class act, Chucky.

Psuedo, what the same crazy heck would be the point of arguing about
that conversation in the NG? First, it was a private conversation
between you and me. Second, with a total lack of evidence available on
either side the "discussion" you call for would devolve into you
said/did not you said/did not you said/did not etc.

You sound like the typical used car salesman, Chucky. The point of
discussing AIMS and our previous conversations about it would be to
illuminate you and your conduct. Readers can and will come to their own
conclusions.

If you think its suddenly your role in life to challenge my ethics,
then do so with some incident or statement that is known to others in
the NG- not a "Gould said this, and in spite of my previous statements
to the contrary you'll now have to take my word for it..." bag of BS.

I'm challenging your conduct precisely BECAUSE of your conduct. I did
not insult and belittle you during my absence, you however did.

The only real record I have of anything Skipper or I said during or
about our meetings is the statement posted some time after our 2nd
meeting in Seattle.
Let's see, how does that go again....oh, yeah.......

JD's Survey Not so Powerful - Chuck is an honest broker. Had I used him
as my representative for a boat I'd seen before contacting him, he would
have saved us ... rec.boats - Oct 26 2001, 9:35 am by Skipper - 65
messages - 15 authors

That repeated snippet seems a bit like the refuge of a scoundrel to me.
I HAVE explained those comments.

GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).

You really are a class act, Chucky.

--
Skipper

Skipper wrote:
*JimH* wrote:


GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).



I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.


As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies. You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.


But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.


Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for your
lies about me.


Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper

Oh boy! Now we have Twiddle Dee & Twiddle Dumb talking back & forth.
Why don't you buy a small boat between the two of you, take Bertie along
for ballast, and go for a nice long cruise.

Starbuckaroo wrote:

Skipper,
From what I can tell from your posts, you are suggesting Gould recommended
donating a boat to Charity for tax purposes, which is neither illegal or
immoral.

You can pretty well bet Chucky has not been going to such extremes
avoiding the requested discussion for that reason. Actually, the reason
he's been so evasive goes to his basic honesty. And on that subject, I
believe his *evasiveness* negates the need for further discussion.
Prosecution rests.

Note - It is however a shame the NG did not benefit from an informative
and on-topic discussion of AIMS.

--
Skipper

Skipper,
What is the name of the charity?


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Starbuckaroo wrote:

Skipper,
From what I can tell from your posts, you are suggesting Gould
recommended
donating a boat to Charity for tax purposes, which is neither illegal or
immoral.

You can pretty well bet Chucky has not been going to such extremes
avoiding the requested discussion for that reason. Actually, the reason
he's been so evasive goes to his basic honesty. And on that subject, I
believe his *evasiveness* negates the need for further discussion.
Prosecution rests.

Note - It is however a shame the NG did not benefit from an informative
and on-topic discussion of AIMS.

--
Skipper

Harry,
I would have thought someone who likes to believe he understands the
internet would have been able to figure out Skipper is the same Skipper you
know and love.

It was silly when you screwed up and were caught using a sock puppet, but
even you can figure out the new Skipper is not a sock puppet or a
PseudoSkipper.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
Skipper wrote:
*JimH* wrote:


GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).


I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.


As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies. You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.


But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.


Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of
writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for
your
lies about me.


Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper

Oh boy! Now we have Twiddle Dee & Twiddle Dumb talking back & forth.
Why don't you buy a small boat between the two of you, take Bertie along
for ballast, and go for a nice long cruise.


I was just thinking almost the same thing...
Now we've got Hertvik the Whiner back, along with PseudoSkipper. Aren't we
lucky?

I'll bet you that when Hertvik was in high school, not a week went by
without someone punching out his lights.

Have you ever encountered an adult male (I use that term loosely) who
whines as much in usenet as Hertvik?

Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Skipper wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).




I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.



As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies. You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.


But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.



Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of
writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for
your
lies about me.



Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper


Oh boy! Now we have Twiddle Dee & Twiddle Dumb talking back & forth.
Why don't you buy a small boat between the two of you, take Bertie
along for ballast, and go for a nice long cruise.



I was just thinking almost the same thing...
Now we've got Hertvik the Whiner back, along with PseudoSkipper. Aren't
we lucky?

I'll bet you that when Hertvik was in high school, not a week went by
without someone punching out his lights.

Have you ever encountered an adult male (I use that term loosely) who
whines as much in usenet as Hertvik?

I'm guessing he hung out with 'the girls'.

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Skipper wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).



I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.



As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is
clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies. You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.


But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.



Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of
writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for
your
lies about me.



Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper


Oh boy! Now we have Twiddle Dee & Twiddle Dumb talking back & forth.
Why don't you buy a small boat between the two of you, take Bertie along
for ballast, and go for a nice long cruise.



I was just thinking almost the same thing...
Now we've got Hertvik the Whiner back, along with PseudoSkipper. Aren't
we lucky?

I'll bet you that when Hertvik was in high school, not a week went by
without someone punching out his lights.

Have you ever encountered an adult male (I use that term loosely) who
whines as much in usenet as Hertvik?

I'm guessing he hung out with 'the girls'.

I tried to be nice to you Don but I see you want to continue with a
confrontational relationship. Go ahead. I will not stoop to your level.