*JimH* wrote:
"Starbucker" wrote in message
news
JimH,

Harry likes to engage you because he believes he can hurt your feelings.
If you are smart, you will not take anything said in rec.boats seriously.

For what it is worth, Don is not a bad guy, he is looking for support from
Harry and the easy way to do that is to take potshots at those Harry
insults. My guess is Don is a nice enough guy in real life.


He has yet to prove it to me despit the fact that I have tried to be nice to
him.

The gloves are off for me with Krause and Gould but I will continue to treat
Don with respect. Maybe he can change.

The gloves are off? Whenever were they on?

Here's hoping Don doesn't "change" to conform to the juvenile standards
of a guy who posts insulting desctions of old photos on the internet.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Skipper wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).




I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.



As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is
clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies.
You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.


But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to
uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.



Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of
writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for
your
lies about me.



Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper


Oh boy! Now we have Twiddle Dee & Twiddle Dumb talking back & forth.
Why don't you buy a small boat between the two of you, take Bertie
along for ballast, and go for a nice long cruise.



I was just thinking almost the same thing...
Now we've got Hertvik the Whiner back, along with PseudoSkipper. Aren't
we lucky?

I'll bet you that when Hertvik was in high school, not a week went by
without someone punching out his lights.

Have you ever encountered an adult male (I use that term loosely) who
whines as much in usenet as Hertvik?

I'm guessing he hung out with 'the girls'.

(I'm entitled to a return salvo.....)

Naw, see his software post just up this thread. He spent his time
"playing with it to see if it really works".


And indeed it does....just fine. ;-)

So why are you, Krause and Don fascinated with *it*? Should we read
something into that?

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
"Starbucker" wrote in message
news
JimH,

Harry likes to engage you because he believes he can hurt your
feelings.
If you are smart, you will not take anything said in rec.boats
seriously.

For what it is worth, Don is not a bad guy, he is looking for support
from
Harry and the easy way to do that is to take potshots at those Harry
insults. My guess is Don is a nice enough guy in real life.


He has yet to prove it to me despit the fact that I have tried to be nice
to
him.

The gloves are off for me with Krause and Gould but I will continue to
treat
Don with respect. Maybe he can change.

The gloves are off? Whenever were they on?

Here's hoping Don doesn't "change" to conform to the juvenile standards
of a guy who posts insulting desctions of old photos on the internet.


Old photo? It was the only one I could find of you.

http://www.boatsafloatshow.com/cgi-b...y_Sep_16,_1:00

Are you ashamed of what you look like Chuck?

BTW: Still waiting for a link to that *attack* post you claimed I recently
wrote. ;-)

Starbucker wrote:
JimH,

Harry likes to engage you because he believes he can hurt your feelings. If
you are smart, you will not take anything said in rec.boats seriously.

For what it is worth, Don is not a bad guy, he is looking for support from
Harry and the easy way to do that is to take potshots at those Harry
insults. My guess is Don is a nice enough guy in real life.


Not about Harry this time. First post I saw from JimH this morning
after his self-imposed exile, was what I took as a jab at Chuck.
(I'm guessing that likeness on the Tinyurl is supposed to be Chuck)
...and yes I know...Chuck certainly doesn't need me butting in.....*but*..

Chuck,

I have always considered any charity that spends less than 10% of it's
contributions on administration and fund raising, as an extremely reputable
and efficient charity. My favorite charity spends 3% on admin and fund
raising.

The BBB uses 35% for admin and fund raising as their criteria for evaluating
reputable charities. The AIMS is not listed on www.Give.org ,
http://www.charitywatch.org/, or http://www.charitynavigator.org/. This is
normally a red flag.

What percent of AIM's contributions are used for admin and fund raising?
This info was not available on AIMS web site, which is another red flag to
look at the charity closely before contributing.


wrote in message
oups.com...

Psuedo, you're a simpering dweeb.

Here are a couple of links to sites that describe some of the work done
by the organization with which I was once associated. As you say, the
NG has many bright members who can decide for themselves (assuming they
gave a ratz patoot in the first place)whether your charge that I was
engaged in a dishonest business and involved in "tax fraud" has any
merit or not.

There were some abuses throughout the entire boat donation industry,
and the firm I worked with was probably not a vestal virgin. No
business (or person) is perfect, or absolutely ethical 24/7/365. That
business morality doesn't automatically reflect on the morality or the
ethics of everybody involved. In recent years, we have seen many news
accounts of pedophile priests and attempts by bishops, etc, to cover up
the crimes of these guys and just transfer them from church to church
rather than deal with the problem. I assume, by your standards, that if
ever you meet a priest you're going to assume he's a pedophile? If
there are 10 people working in a church and it is ultimately discovered
that the priest has been having his way with the altar boys in the
confession booth, would you consider the church secretary, the janitor,
etc etc etc pedophiles as well? Would you consider any church to be the
domain of a pedophile?

Still have any of that literature you claim I gave you 6 or 7 years
ago?
If so, take a look at it. Every page had bold statements urging people
considering the donation of a boat to check with their own attorney or
tax professional before going ahead. Most did, and some of them
discovered that for various reasons, (such as AMT, specific bracketing,
etc), it wouldn't be a good idea to proceed. Fine. In my role, I wasn't
in the business of giving tax advice but I could explain the mechanics
of the program as it would be implemented for people who chose to make
a donation. We continuously urged prospective donors to get some
independent advice before donating.


http://www.miami.edu/campaign/donors...s_dp_aims.html


http://www.aims-nw.org/seattleservice.htm


http://www.mpcfaculty.net/tami_lunsf...returnsweb.pdf

http://www.miami.edu/campaign/donors...s_dp_aims.html

As far as I'm concerned, that's my portion of this "discussion".

GFYS. (go fantasize you're skipper)

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Skipper wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of course).




I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for your
whopper of a lie about me.



As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is
clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies.
You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.


But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles. It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to
uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.



Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me of
writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you for
your
lies about me.



Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper


Oh boy! Now we have Twiddle Dee & Twiddle Dumb talking back & forth.
Why don't you buy a small boat between the two of you, take Bertie
along for ballast, and go for a nice long cruise.



I was just thinking almost the same thing...
Now we've got Hertvik the Whiner back, along with PseudoSkipper. Aren't
we lucky?

I'll bet you that when Hertvik was in high school, not a week went by
without someone punching out his lights.

Have you ever encountered an adult male (I use that term loosely) who
whines as much in usenet as Hertvik?

I'm guessing he hung out with 'the girls'.

(I'm entitled to a return salvo.....)

Naw, see his software post just up this thread. He spent his time
"playing with it to see if it really works".


And indeed it does....just fine. ;-)

So why are you, Krause and Don fascinated with *it*? Should we read
something into that?


No, but I'm distressed to hear that you have aged to the point where
you're reduced to playing with "software". Too bad. Still pretty much a
hardware guy myself, (knock on "wood").

As far as your upthread demand that I produce your "attack
post"...wherever do you suppose I'd find one? I sure didn't see your
name on that list of people
known to be nasty arse flamers in the NG.....oh, but wait,...you
provided the list (and everybody on it was a liberal, imagine)......

Skipper wrote:


Krause, Gould and Don White have always been nasty. Their
"contributions" are the major reason this NG is now in the toilet.

--
Skipper

Well, thank the Lord you're back. Maybe things will improve.....!

"Don White" wrote in message
news
Starbucker wrote:
JimH,

Harry likes to engage you because he believes he can hurt your feelings.
If you are smart, you will not take anything said in rec.boats seriously.

For what it is worth, Don is not a bad guy, he is looking for support
from Harry and the easy way to do that is to take potshots at those Harry
insults. My guess is Don is a nice enough guy in real life.


Not about Harry this time. First post I saw from JimH this morning
after his self-imposed exile, was what I took as a jab at Chuck.

Yep. And what did it have to do with you Don?


(I'm guessing that likeness on the Tinyurl is supposed to be Chuck)

If that is who you think it is based on the characteristics I listed then
that your option.

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Skipper wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


GFYS. Psuedo. (Stands for: Go fantasize you're Skipper, of
course).




I have caught up on what you have written since I have left over
a
week ago. I see you still perpetuate the lies about me, including
the fact that continue to claim that you apologized to me for
your
whopper of a lie about me.



As with most used car salesman types, it would appear Chucky is
clueless
regarding the differences or dividing line between truth and lies.
You
are dealing with a pretty low class individual.


But how fun it is to see you twist and turn like this Chuckles.
It
seems that Old Skipper has struck a raw nerve and is about to
uncover
you for the pathetic person you really are.



Chucky will make that disclosure himself...by his actions and
obfuscation of the truth.


PS. I am still waiting to see the *attack post* you accused me
of
writing
about you. I am also still waiting for a real apology from you
for
your
lies about me.



Chucky just doesn't possess the class needed to offer that overdue
apology.

--
Skipper


Oh boy! Now we have Twiddle Dee & Twiddle Dumb talking back &
forth.
Why don't you buy a small boat between the two of you, take Bertie
along for ballast, and go for a nice long cruise.



I was just thinking almost the same thing...
Now we've got Hertvik the Whiner back, along with PseudoSkipper.
Aren't
we lucky?

I'll bet you that when Hertvik was in high school, not a week went
by
without someone punching out his lights.

Have you ever encountered an adult male (I use that term loosely)
who
whines as much in usenet as Hertvik?

I'm guessing he hung out with 'the girls'.

(I'm entitled to a return salvo.....)

Naw, see his software post just up this thread. He spent his time
"playing with it to see if it really works".


And indeed it does....just fine. ;-)

So why are you, Krause and Don fascinated with *it*? Should we read
something into that?


No, but I'm distressed to hear that you have aged to the point where
you're reduced to playing with "software". Too bad. Still pretty much a
hardware guy myself, (knock on "wood").

As far as your upthread demand that I produce your "attack
post"...wherever do you suppose I'd find one?

I don't know. So where is the recent *attack* post on you that you stated I
authored in your post on October 3rd? You made the claim. If you cannot
produce it I will just assume this is yet another Chuckie lie.

Have a nice day Chuckles.

*JimH* wrote:

If that is who you think it is based on the characteristics I listed then
that your option.


Not quite like that. I'm getting to understand your 'MO'!