Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guys,
I am looking for a friend for a Yamaha 13x17 prop, is there a cheap online place (not ebay)? Also looking for yamaha accessories like speedometer, fuel gage and such .. any idea for that? Thanks, Matt |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Theres a few on Ebay.
db wrote in message ps.com... Guys, I am looking for a friend for a Yamaha 13x17 prop, is there a cheap online place (not ebay)? Also looking for yamaha accessories like speedometer, fuel gage and such .. any idea for that? Thanks, Matt |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... wrote: : Guys, : I am looking for a friend for a Yamaha 13x17 prop, is there a cheap : online place (not ebay)? : Also looking for yamaha accessories like speedometer, fuel gage and : such .. any idea for that? : Thanks, : Matt I've been quite impressed with iboats.com I boutht a Michitan wheel prop from them at a very good price. They also have other vendors. If you want to get the price down, get an alunimum prop. The stainless ones are much more expensive. For the minute extra performance, I don't see the advantage in them but I'm we'll enter a "religious war" debating the subject. barry Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface characteristics? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface characteristics? Stainless steel is STIFFER than the aluminum prop and will outperform it. Also, aluminum props ding up much easier than steel props. Stainless is the way to go. -- Skipper |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skipper wrote:
: Doug Kanter wrote: : Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an : aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform : differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface : characteristics? : Stainless steel is STIFFER than the aluminum prop and will outperform : it. Also, aluminum props ding up much easier than steel props. Stainless : is the way to go. (I knew this would get started) In the comparison tests I've read (Trailerboats magazine) the speed advantage of Stainless was about 2 MPH. The cost premium was over 3X the cost of aluminum. So... the choice is yours but from my perspective (and I've had a boat for geez... over 40 years) I wasn't willing to pay the price premium for Stanless given the minute performance advantage. (I'll bow out of the now) barry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface characteristics? Doug, no one would make a NiBrAl, brass, or SS prop with blades as thick as needed for the "same prop"(dia, pitch, area, shape) in aluminum, so you will never be able to make that comparison. A SS prop will be forgiving on logs & sandbars. Personal experience on our Glastron shows little difference in speed(SS slight advantage) but the SS is less prone to blow-outs and gives a better trim attide than the "same spec" aluminum. Polished SS props can be very pretty on your floating Camaro, too! Rob |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:47:16 -0500, Skipper wrote: Stainless is the way to go. If all your boat ever expects to see is water. Give that man a cigar! |