"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

" *JimH*" wrote in message
...


What I read was a lot of accusation with absolutely no link or sources
supporting the claims.

So to me it is nothing more than..............political crap.



Here's another beleive what you want....
Here's McKinney grilling Rumsfeld over the lost $$$
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/...s_rumsfeld.htm




yawn

Wake me up when you find a credible source for your information.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., called it a pernicious proposal and a
"dagger to the heart of the people of New York.



Heh. I find this really amusing. Senator Schumer blasting a tax
increase.


Of course, if Bubba had proposed the tax increase,. Shumer would have
been all for it!

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:58:53 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On 21 Oct 2005 03:39:33 -0700, wrote:

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., called it a pernicious proposal and a
"dagger to the heart of the people of New York.

Heh. I find this really amusing. Senator Schumer blasting a tax
increase.

Of course, if Bubba had proposed the tax increase,. Shumer would have
been all for it!

There are very few people that I can't say something good about or
even respect. Schumer is one of those self-aggrandizing weasels who
just set my teeth on edge.

IMHO, he doesn't come close to Pelosi.

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant:
It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..

"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

" *JimH*" wrote in message
...


What I read was a lot of accusation with absolutely no link or sources
supporting the claims.

So to me it is nothing more than..............political crap.



Here's another beleive what you want....
Here's McKinney grilling Rumsfeld over the lost $$$
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/...s_rumsfeld.htm




yawn

Wake me up when you find a credible source for your information.



so c-span is not credible? even when it is a video of House Hearing on FY06
Dept. of Defense Budget, March 11th, 2005.

I guess you only believe Karl Rove and faux news eh?

"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..

"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

" *JimH*" wrote in message
...


What I read was a lot of accusation with absolutely no link or sources
supporting the claims.

So to me it is nothing more than..............political crap.



Here's another beleive what you want....
Here's McKinney grilling Rumsfeld over the lost $$$
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/...s_rumsfeld.htm




yawn

Wake me up when you find a credible source for your information.



so c-span is not credible? even when it is a video of House Hearing on
FY06
Dept. of Defense Budget, March 11th, 2005.

I guess you only believe Karl Rove and faux news eh?



Nope. Do you?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Gorf wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..
"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...
" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

What I read was a lot of accusation with absolutely no link or
sources
supporting the claims.

So to me it is nothing more than..............political crap.


Here's another beleive what you want....
Here's McKinney grilling Rumsfeld over the lost $$$
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/...s_rumsfeld.htm



yawn

Wake me up when you find a credible source for your information.



so c-span is not credible? even when it is a video of House Hearing on
FY06
Dept. of Defense Budget, March 11th, 2005.

I guess you only believe Karl Rove and faux news eh?




There isn't an instance in usenet history in which Jim Hertvik has
demonstrated possession of more than below-average intellect.

An amazing thing about some of these low-brain-output righties is their
absolute refusal to take reality into account in their support for
George W. Bush. No matter how Bush screws up, they're ready with the
excuses and rationalizations.

As much as I like Bill Clinton, I never held him up to be a paragon. He
was and is a bright, articulate, capable fellow with unlimited ability
to reveal his feelings for humanity, but, like most of us, he is a
flawed individual.

Bush, on the other hand, seems, as president, to be a model for
incompetency.


I hated Clinton and voted for Bush in 2000. I cheered when the SC declared
Gore a cry baby, I thanked the good lord Bush was in office on 9/11, and I
supported his invasion of Afghanistan 100%. But as soon as Bush started
trying to sell the idea that Osama was not the real terrorist - Saddam was
and started telling obvious lies about WMD's, that's when my opinion of Bush
change 180 degrees.
In 2000 I screamed that Clinton was the worst president that we ever had,
But Bush has him beat hands down - now Clinton looks like the good ole
days.....

Another good video:
Video-WMP
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/cnn...op_051020a.wmv

"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Gorf wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..
"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...
" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

What I read was a lot of accusation with absolutely no link or
sources
supporting the claims.

So to me it is nothing more than..............political crap.


Here's another beleive what you want....
Here's McKinney grilling Rumsfeld over the lost $$$
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/...s_rumsfeld.htm



yawn

Wake me up when you find a credible source for your information.



so c-span is not credible? even when it is a video of House Hearing on
FY06
Dept. of Defense Budget, March 11th, 2005.

I guess you only believe Karl Rove and faux news eh?




There isn't an instance in usenet history in which Jim Hertvik has
demonstrated possession of more than below-average intellect.

An amazing thing about some of these low-brain-output righties is their
absolute refusal to take reality into account in their support for
George W. Bush. No matter how Bush screws up, they're ready with the
excuses and rationalizations.

As much as I like Bill Clinton, I never held him up to be a paragon. He
was and is a bright, articulate, capable fellow with unlimited ability
to reveal his feelings for humanity, but, like most of us, he is a
flawed individual.

Bush, on the other hand, seems, as president, to be a model for
incompetency.



My statements had nothing to do with my like or dislike of George Bush and
his policies. They had everything to do with the credibility of the
articles posted.

I would guess even a third grader could understand that.....you obviously
did not.

And *you* call my intellect below average? LOL!

*JimH* wrote:
? LOL!

Idiots are easily amused.

Gorf wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Gorf wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..
"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...
" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

What I read was a lot of accusation with absolutely no link or
sources
supporting the claims.

So to me it is nothing more than..............political crap.


Here's another beleive what you want....
Here's McKinney grilling Rumsfeld over the lost $$$
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/...s_rumsfeld.htm



yawn

Wake me up when you find a credible source for your information.



so c-span is not credible? even when it is a video of House Hearing on
FY06
Dept. of Defense Budget, March 11th, 2005.

I guess you only believe Karl Rove and faux news eh?




There isn't an instance in usenet history in which Jim Hertvik has
demonstrated possession of more than below-average intellect.

An amazing thing about some of these low-brain-output righties is their
absolute refusal to take reality into account in their support for
George W. Bush. No matter how Bush screws up, they're ready with the
excuses and rationalizations.

As much as I like Bill Clinton, I never held him up to be a paragon. He
was and is a bright, articulate, capable fellow with unlimited ability
to reveal his feelings for humanity, but, like most of us, he is a
flawed individual.

Bush, on the other hand, seems, as president, to be a model for
incompetency.


I hated Clinton and voted for Bush in 2000. I cheered when the SC declared
Gore a cry baby, I thanked the good lord Bush was in office on 9/11, and I
supported his invasion of Afghanistan 100%. But as soon as Bush started
trying to sell the idea that Osama was not the real terrorist - Saddam was
and started telling obvious lies about WMD's, that's when my opinion of Bush
change 180 degrees.
In 2000 I screamed that Clinton was the worst president that we ever had,
But Bush has him beat hands down - now Clinton looks like the good ole
days.....

I applaud your honesty, as well as your ability to see that, even
though conservative by nature, that Bush is horrible for this country.
Most right wingers are mere lemmings, and would never, ever think of
"betraying" BushCo.

*JimH* wrote:
"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:58:41 GMT, "Gorf" wrote:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote in
:

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
Yep, they're all about lower taxes.....

Notice the 50% increase in the tax rate for the folks on the
bottom end of the scale? (Increases from 10% to 15%).

Mortgage deduction: Too bad it can't be saved for inexpensive
"starter" homes purchased by young families, but a good
percentage
of folks who are
allowing the government to subsidize their personal housing
expense (by enabling them to pay interest on $1mm mortgages with
tax-free dollars)
A tax cut isn't a subsidy!


also fall into a group that gnashes and wails at the very
thought of
any public assistance for low income renters. In reality, the
mortgage interest deduction is probably safe- can you say
"Catastrophic real estate crash", otherwise? It might be
reasonable to phase out the mortgage interest deduction over a
period of time, eliminating it entirely for mortgages dated
after
XX/XX/XX.

It is long past time for a bi-partisan effort to reduce spending
and/or raise taxes to restore some fiscal credibilty to our
runaway spendthrift FEDGOV.
I'd support the elimination of itemized deductions...BUT only if
they went to a flat tax across all income levels.




I'd make all income taxable at the current rates



, and increase exemptions for families earning under $50,000, and,
of course, I'd cut b ack drastically on corporate tax breaks. But
I
would offer incentives for those corporations building new
factories
and facilities in the USA.


So would you cut back the deductibility of home mortgages as
proposed?



I didn't say that, did I?

I would, however, eliminate the deduction for a second home.

What non-defense spending would you cut?

why stick with non-defense? 42% of the budget,approximately, goes to
military either past spending (i.e. Reagan's deficit) or current
spending
The military LOST, as in misplaced, one TRILLION dollars last year. If
that
was corporation all upper management would be in jail, because it is the
military it barely made the news....... The military needs to be made
accountable!

http://www.ccmep.org/2004_articles/i...t_military.htm


Now *that's* funny!

--
John H

You really should try get your news from more than one source...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...type=printable



sfgate.com and ccmep.com.....both are indeed credible sources of
information.

What do you find in the sfgate article that isn't truthful and correct?


LOL.

Idiots are easily amused.