"Bill McKee" wrote in message
link.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
PocoLoco wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:33:48 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:13:41 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:
I'm just curious about something: You must have some idea of how many
years
we'd need to be Iraq, stalled in exactly the same way we are now,
before
you'd say something's seriously wrong. How many years would that be?
3
That's not far off. What will you do when it reaches 3?

I'd say, "Something's seriously wrong."

And then he'd go vote for the next simpie Republican who promised more of
the same.

Sort of like all the POTUS's since 1945 that have kept troops in Europe,
and Japan?


Other than boredom, I haven't heard many complaints from soldiers stationed
there. Occasional complaints here about the cost of keeping people in those
places. What have you heard?

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"P Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46919

She has more mental problems than harry and kevin combined


"I believe that the intelligent thing for Democrats to do for 2006
and
2008
would be to come out strongly and correctly against the botched,
bungled,
illegal, and immoral occupation of Iraq," Sheehan added. "



Intelligent if they wish to continue dismantling the party.

I'm just curious about something: You must have some idea of how many
years we'd need to be Iraq, stalled in exactly the same way we are
now,
before you'd say something's seriously wrong. How many years would
that
be?

Fifty or more. We are still in Germany and Japan from WWII.

Hell, I wouldn't have a problem if we were permanently there.





Just one problem, pusswad: "We" doesn't mean YOU. You'll be home stuffing
cheez doodles in your shorts while other peoples' kids are being killed.