"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:

He's not my idiot; he's your idiot. I never voted for him. And, as far
as being a better POTUS than Gore or Kerry might have been, we'll just
never know. I feel Gore would have been far better, but I really don't
know that much about Kerry.

Dumbocrats are idiots and have no real monetary, budgetary, or foreign
policy. The current crop of Repubs is little better, but they do offer
the better option.

--
Skipper

Take a look at the facts and tell us who has better monitary policy.

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Gorf wrote:

It's best not to underestimate the total damage that's been done to
our
country by allowing illegal aliens to abuse our medical system.
Someone
has to pay for this abuse. Bottom line, we ALL do. The hospitals jack
up
their rates to compensate...insurance companies jack up their
rates...employers are forced to pay exhorbinant premiums or send the
work out of the country...a vicious spiral. It costs us jobs and
lowers
our mean standard of living.

And what has GWB's response been?

Conservative Republicans offer the best chance to remedy the situation.
The Looney Left wants the illegal's vote, and will continue to give the
world free medical care, drivers licenses,etc.. McCain is no solution
and Hillary is worse.

--
Skipper

actually because of GWB not wanting to deport the illegal aliens, and the
fact that they are strict Catholics, they primarily support the
republicans - not democrats. Bush passed a law making allowing illegal
aliens to collect Social security - think you better take your blinders
off
and actually do some reading........

As far as Hilary - if she is nominated by the democrats, they will be
handed
another loss.

I'm not so sure about that. It's fine points that detract from most
candidates. If she learns to shut her friggin' mouth about certain hot
button issues, like gun control, she might actually have a chance.

wrote:

You turn America's pride, the Panama Canal over to leftists who give
control of the Canal over to America's avowed enemies in communist
China.

3. The Panama Canal was rightfully returned to Panama. As a country that
supports democracy, we have no business imposing our will on countries
that want their territory back.

More specifically, our *lease* was up.

You have to wonder what message it would have sent to the world if the
US had said, "We choose not to honor the original agreement. We're at
the end of the lease, but screw you- we ain't movin' out and you can't
make us."

BS, more specifically, more Looney Left BS. Lyndon B. Johnson abrogated
the original treaty in 1964-65, setting up the full giveaway by Jimmy
Carter in 1977. And Carter gave it to a non-elected leftist dictator
(his favorite kind of leader). The DEMOCRATS did us in!!!

http://www.answers.com/topic/torrijos-carter-treaties

http://www.historychannel.com/speech...peech_145.html

Bottom line...as John Frank Stevens said, Lefty Loonies BS, more
specifically, more Looney Left BS. Lyndon B. Johnson abrogated the
original treaty in 1964-65, setting up the full giveaway by Jimmy Carter
in 1977. And Carter gave it to a non-elected leftist dictator (his
favorite kind of leader).

http://www.answers.com/topic/torrijos-carter-treaties

http://www.historychannel.com/speech...peech_145.html

Bottom line...as John Frank Stevens said, Lefty Loonies exhibit the
worst disease...cold feet!

--------

John Frank Stevens was recognized as the world's foremost railway civil
engineer when he arrived on the Isthmus in 1905. Tall, broad-shouldered,
tough, the new Chief Engineer met no reception formalities. The wharves
were crowded with scared, quiet men waiting to return to the States on
the very ship he came on.

The fundamental problem that he faced was one of restoring confidence
and morale. Health came first. The men needed food supplies and markets,
decent living quarters, relief from the drab existence in the form of
social rooms and entertainment. One of his first ideas, and a most happy
one, was that of the food car. Stevens found the men were actually
hungry, and the men found that they had a boss who took a personal
interest in their welfare. With the food came some strong talk. Dressed
like the men, Chief Engineer Stevens stood among them, spoke their blunt
language, rubbed their elbows.

"There are only three diseases on the Isthmus," he charged into them,
"yellow fever, malaria, and cold feet. The worst is cold feet. That's
what's ailing you." It was the scolding they needed. Groups began
arguing themselves into staying a little longer. Some good might come
out of the chaos yet.

--
Skipper

BTW, the original treaty the U.S. signed in 1903 gave it the rights to
build and operate the canal *for perpetuity*. The agreement also gave
the U.S. the
right to govern the 10-mile wide, 40-mile long strip of land around the
canal, called the Panama Canal Zone.

It was poor leadership by Democrats that cost us OUR canal.

--
Skipper

Nationalism came back to haunt the United States. With the
treaty signed and a 99-year lease given to the United States, the
Canal was built. Since then, the United States has varied on its
stance of ownership and the principles of sovereignty concerning the
Canal. The ever persistent debate of who owns the Canal and who should
have sovereign control over it, has not been solved. The United States
has occasionally attempted to "claim" the Canal zone through various
methods such as military occupation, exclusion of Panamanians for
important jobs in Canal operations and even through the customary
aspect of international law. However, each time the Panamanians have
managed to maintain claim to the Canal despite the United State's
imperialistic posturing to get it.

http://www.cyberessays.com/History/121.htm



"Skipper" wrote in message
...
BTW, the original treaty the U.S. signed in 1903 gave it the rights to
build and operate the canal *for perpetuity*. The agreement also gave
the U.S. the
right to govern the 10-mile wide, 40-mile long strip of land around the
canal, called the Panama Canal Zone.

It was poor leadership by Democrats that cost us OUR canal.

--
Skipper

"Skipper" wrote in message
...

And Carter gave it to a non-elected leftist dictator
(his favorite kind of leader). The DEMOCRATS did us in!!!

You must cum in your mom's hand every time you see the picture of Donald
Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.

Smith Smithers wrote:

wrote:

BTW, the original treaty the U.S. signed in 1903 gave it the rights
to build and operate the canal *for perpetuity*. The agreement also
gave the U.S. the right to govern the 10-mile wide, 40-mile long
strip of land around the canal, called the Panama Canal Zone.

It was poor leadership by Democrats that cost us OUR canal.

With the treaty signed and a 99-year lease given to the United States, the
Canal was built.

The original agreement seeded the canal "in perpetuity", not just 99
years. Do not fall for the Looney Left's spin. They always take the
position, America last.

--
Skipper

Doug Kanter wrote:

"Skipper" wrote in message
...

And Carter gave it to a non-elected leftist dictator
(his favorite kind of leader). The DEMOCRATS did us in!!!

You must cum in your mom's hand every time you see the picture of Donald
Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.

Just presenting a little 'no spin zone' phactual data to the Loonies who
have hijacked this NG.

--
Skipper

"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Skipper" wrote in message
...

And Carter gave it to a non-elected leftist dictator
(his favorite kind of leader). The DEMOCRATS did us in!!!

You must cum in your mom's hand every time you see the picture of Donald
Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.

Just presenting a little 'no spin zone' phactual data to the Loonies who
have hijacked this NG.

Confess to knowing that your presidents papa was in bed with Saddam, even
before he was president. Confess now, infidel.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...



As far as Hilary - if she is nominated by the democrats, they will be
handed
another loss.

I'm not so sure about that. It's fine points that detract from most
candidates. If she learns to shut her friggin' mouth about certain hot
button issues, like gun control, she might actually have a chance.



I firmly believe the US is not ready for a woman or black president. All
peoples prejudices will come bubbling up and either would lose. I mean look
at the last election, it was well known that Bush was liar and incompetent,
he had lost more jobs during his first term in office than any other
president, he had the largest deficit in history and he had more votes
AGAINST him than any other president in history. But the brain-washed
holier-than-thou crowd turned out even more people!
IMO Hillary would get CREAMED!