"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
President Bush Job Approval
Updated Daily by Noon Eastern

Bush Job Approval
Strongly Approve 22%
Somewhat Approve 19%
Somewhat Disapprove 15%
Strongly Disapprove 44%

RasmussenReports.com

R
Wednesday October 26, 2005--Forty-one percent (41%) of American
adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as
President. This is the lowest level recorded ever recorded by
Rasmussen Reports.

Among Republicans, the President's Approval Rating has fallen to
73%, matching the lowest level ever recorded.

For most of his time in office, the President's Approval Rating
among Republicans has been in the high-80s.

Overall, 59% of Americans Disapprove, including 44% who strongly
disapprove. That is the highest percentage to Strongly Disapprove
of his job performance.

Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans now say that bringing the
troops home from Iraq is more important than finishing the mission
in that country. This is the first time that a majority of
Americans have held that view.

Just 33% give the President good or excellent ratings for his
handling of the situation in Iraq. Thirty-nine percent (39%) say
the U.S. and its allies are winning the War on Terrorism.

During 2004, reports on the President Job Approval were based upon
surveys of Likely Voters. Typically, a survey of Likely Voters
would report a Job Approval rating 2-3 points higher than a survey
of all adults.

On Election Day, the President's Job Approval was at 52%. During
all of 2004, the President's Job Approval ranged from a high of 57%
in early January to a low of 43% on August 17.

- - -


This is hilarious for any number of reasons.
Rasmussen is my least favorite poll, and has been for a long time,
because of its non-human methodology. But since NOYB told us last
week that Bush was on the rise in the Rasmussen poll...

That's the difference between you and me. I'll stick with
Rasmussen's numbers as being the most accurate of all of the
pollsters...even if I don't like them.

There is no doubt that the moveon.org campaign to send a constant
barrage of negative spin against the Republicans to the press has
been working. But when the Cheney/Plame and Tom Delay witchhunts are
over, and everybody has been exhonerated, Bush's numbers will
rebound.


A. Bush's current numbers are based upon his dismal performance.

His numbers have nothing to do with "performance". His numbers have
to do with the media's infatuation with Plamegate, Tom Delay, and any
reports of violence out of Iraq.

If the numbers were based upon his performance, the numbers would be
quite high...reflecting low unemployment, no domestic terrorist
attacks in over 4 years, and a booming housing market.

Not being a manager of any stature, it may come as a surprise to you
that people may be reacting to his inability to handle his underlings,
and keep them from turning government into an embarrassment.

If one of the ongoing witchhunts ever results in a conviction, then come
talk to me.

Those don't matter. The damage is already done, just as it was with
Clinton. Your president cannot manage his staff. If Rove has to be made
to vanish, things will get even worse, since he is what guides Bush.

Cheney would step aside before Rove would ever leave.



Whatever. Isn't it interesting when things work out exactly the same way for
your president at they did for Clinton?

Cheney would step aside before Rove would ever leave.


It's quite possible that before all this is over, the only thing between
Vice President Cheney and life behind bars will be a Presidential pardon
similar to the one Ford gave Nixon.

Doug Kanter wrote:
Whatever. Isn't it interesting when things work out exactly the same way for
your president at they did for Clinton?


???

Have the Democrats spent $70 million+ hunting for any possible elusive
sign of wrong-doing, and jailing people for not providing evidence that
doesn't exist? Have the Democrats spent 5 years on a wild goose chase,
determined to dig up any mud possible? Is the Special Prosecutor going
to file a 700+ page report about a blow job?

Aside from that, the country isn't anywhere near as well run as it was
under Clinton. The economy sucks, the miltary is strapped, we have more
enemies than ever before, and citizens have fewer rights. We have more
than twice as many lobbyists as at the end of Clinton's term, much less
the beginning.

By the time Clinton had been President for five years, we were
recognizably into the longest & biggest peace time economic boom in U.S.
history.

I know you know all this Doug, but it's fun to hammer this point home
when a dozen Bush-Cheney cheerleaders are going to blow a gasket reading
the truth.

DSK

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
President Bush Job Approval
Updated Daily by Noon Eastern

Bush Job Approval
Strongly Approve 22%
Somewhat Approve 19%
Somewhat Disapprove 15%
Strongly Disapprove 44%

RasmussenReports.com

R
Wednesday October 26, 2005--Forty-one percent (41%) of American
adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as
President. This is the lowest level recorded ever recorded by
Rasmussen Reports.

Among Republicans, the President's Approval Rating has fallen to
73%, matching the lowest level ever recorded.

For most of his time in office, the President's Approval Rating
among Republicans has been in the high-80s.

Overall, 59% of Americans Disapprove, including 44% who strongly
disapprove. That is the highest percentage to Strongly Disapprove
of his job performance.

Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans now say that bringing the
troops home from Iraq is more important than finishing the mission
in that country. This is the first time that a majority of
Americans have held that view.

Just 33% give the President good or excellent ratings for his
handling of the situation in Iraq. Thirty-nine percent (39%) say
the U.S. and its allies are winning the War on Terrorism.

During 2004, reports on the President Job Approval were based upon
surveys of Likely Voters. Typically, a survey of Likely Voters
would report a Job Approval rating 2-3 points higher than a survey
of all adults.

On Election Day, the President's Job Approval was at 52%. During
all of 2004, the President's Job Approval ranged from a high of
57% in early January to a low of 43% on August 17.

- - -


This is hilarious for any number of reasons.
Rasmussen is my least favorite poll, and has been for a long time,
because of its non-human methodology. But since NOYB told us last
week that Bush was on the rise in the Rasmussen poll...

That's the difference between you and me. I'll stick with
Rasmussen's numbers as being the most accurate of all of the
pollsters...even if I don't like them.

There is no doubt that the moveon.org campaign to send a constant
barrage of negative spin against the Republicans to the press has
been working. But when the Cheney/Plame and Tom Delay witchhunts
are over, and everybody has been exhonerated, Bush's numbers will
rebound.


A. Bush's current numbers are based upon his dismal performance.

His numbers have nothing to do with "performance". His numbers have
to do with the media's infatuation with Plamegate, Tom Delay, and any
reports of violence out of Iraq.

If the numbers were based upon his performance, the numbers would be
quite high...reflecting low unemployment, no domestic terrorist
attacks in over 4 years, and a booming housing market.

Not being a manager of any stature, it may come as a surprise to you
that people may be reacting to his inability to handle his underlings,
and keep them from turning government into an embarrassment.

If one of the ongoing witchhunts ever results in a conviction, then
come talk to me.

Those don't matter. The damage is already done, just as it was with
Clinton. Your president cannot manage his staff. If Rove has to be made
to vanish, things will get even worse, since he is what guides Bush.

Cheney would step aside before Rove would ever leave.



Whatever. Isn't it interesting when things work out exactly the same way
for your president at they did for Clinton?

At least Clinton got a blow job out of it...even if it was from a fat
intern.

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Cheney would step aside before Rove would ever leave.


It's quite possible that before all this is over, the only thing between
Vice President Cheney and life behind bars will be a Presidential pardon
similar to the one Ford gave Nixon.


Naaaaa.



Doug Kanter wrote:
Whatever. Isn't it interesting when things work out exactly the same way
for your president at they did for Clinton?

???

Have the Democrats spent $70 million+ hunting for any possible elusive
sign of wrong-doing, and jailing people for not providing evidence that
doesn't exist?

If they were in power, you can bet that they'd have spent at least that
much. Instead, they spent more than that through Section 501c3 tax-exempt
groups like moveon.org.



Have the Democrats spent 5 years on a wild goose chase,
determined to dig up any mud possible?

Yes. See above.

Is the Special Prosecutor going to file a 700+ page report about a blow
job?

Who knows how long the special prosecutors report will be.





Aside from that, the country isn't anywhere near as well run as it was
under Clinton. The economy sucks,

The economy is pretty damn good. What economic indicators are you using to
substantiate your claim that the economy is anything but strong?



the miltary is strapped,

No it's not. We have less than 15% of our active duty and reserve troops
stationed in Iraq...and an even lesser percentage of our heavily armored
forces and aircraft.


we have more
enemies than ever before,

No we don't. It's the same old enemies. It's just that Bush ahs flushed
them out of hiding and now they're on the run.


and citizens have fewer rights.

Really? Which of your rights were infringed upon? The right to sue gun
manufacturers for injuries sustained from a gun? The right to carry a box
cutter on an airplane? Give me specifics of how you personally were
affected?


We have more than twice as many lobbyists as at the end of Clinton's term,
much less the beginning.

Source?


By the time Clinton had been President for five years, we were
recognizably into the longest & biggest peace time economic boom in U.S.
history.

The economic expansion started in late 1991...but came a little too late to
get Bush 41 re-elected. Of course, if Perot hadn't run, people today would
be saying "Clinton who?".

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Cheney would step aside before Rove would ever leave.


It's quite possible that before all this is over, the only thing between
Vice President Cheney and life behind bars will be a Presidential pardon
similar to the one Ford gave Nixon.


Naaaaa.

That is liebral moonbat wet dreams......

First, there was no crime, which was pretty obvious from day one, so the
best that they will come up with is "maybe" a obstruction of the
investigation of a non crime.




Doug Kanter wrote:
Whatever. Isn't it interesting when things work out exactly the same
way
for your president at they did for Clinton?

???

Have the Democrats spent $70 million+ hunting for any possible elusive
sign of wrong-doing, and jailing people for not providing evidence that
doesn't exist?

If they were in power, you can bet that they'd have spent at least that
much. Instead, they spent more than that through Section 501c3 tax-exempt
groups like moveon.org.



Have the Democrats spent 5 years on a wild goose chase,
determined to dig up any mud possible?

Yes. See above.

Is the Special Prosecutor going to file a 700+ page report about a blow
job?

Who knows how long the special prosecutors report will be.





Aside from that, the country isn't anywhere near as well run as it was
under Clinton. The economy sucks,

The economy is pretty damn good. What economic indicators are you using
to
substantiate your claim that the economy is anything but strong?



the miltary is strapped,

No it's not. We have less than 15% of our active duty and reserve troops
stationed in Iraq...and an even lesser percentage of our heavily armored
forces and aircraft.


we have more
enemies than ever before,

No we don't. It's the same old enemies. It's just that Bush ahs flushed
them out of hiding and now they're on the run.


and citizens have fewer rights.

Really? Which of your rights were infringed upon? The right to sue gun
manufacturers for injuries sustained from a gun? The right to carry a box
cutter on an airplane? Give me specifics of how you personally were
affected?


We have more than twice as many lobbyists as at the end of Clinton's
term,
much less the beginning.

Source?


By the time Clinton had been President for five years, we were
recognizably into the longest & biggest peace time economic boom in U.S.
history.

The economic expansion started in late 1991...but came a little too late
to
get Bush 41 re-elected. Of course, if Perot hadn't run, people today
would
be saying "Clinton who?".

And you are PROUD of this guy's performance? WOW, are you in lala land
or what?

Capt. Jeff