Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:49:12 -0500, Skipper wrote:
Len wrote: The point here is can you take 5 seconds in which you stop pointing back at me with all kinds of mirrorred critiques and have a good look at how things are becoming in the us. That mirror works both ways, Len. I'm afraid you misunderstand what's going on over here. It's not about compassion, or lack of it, it's about the thieving forced redistribution of wealth and real freedoms. We have had our share of incompetent leadership; Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, etc., but we also have had true world leaders like Reagan. Our once great Democrat party is no more, having been hijacked by radical socialists and assorted special interests. Suspect you have your share of wackos too (judging from the Aruba fiasco). Lets try to lift the discussion from the simple pointing at situations or anecdotes. Cause if we don't there only will be a series of it. In my post I admmitted up front there are things to be seriously improved in Europe. Why can't you? Are you serious in calling Reagan a competent leader? In my view he was accidentally in office when a true leader like Gorbatsjow entered the circustent. What would or better could Reagan have achieved without Gorbatsjow bringing Glasnost and Perestrojka? Furthermore he is the one that started serious overspending to please the industry (Star Wars). He spent that much that democrats wil have to raise taxes (cause the reps won't) so their and you children will have a lesser debt. What is actually wrong with this series of facts? Please stick to this series.... Regards, Len. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len wrote:
So you Canadians really are "blessed", in every aspect so far ![]() No wonder every day three farmers or lorrydrivers quit their business/job over here and emigrate to the land with the Maple Leaf. There sure must be a lot of dutchmen over there... Sorry I asked that question, Jim. I appreciate your open answer a lot. Whenever my wife or I arrive at that roadbend, we'll no doubt do the same thing... I am very glad to live in a country where it's possible. Warm regards, Len. Right up till this summer I thought I was part Dutch...from American Loyalists chased from Harlem area of New York by the motley rabble around 1776. Mom was down to her mother's home in Digby county and someone had researched a book on the origins of settlers outside the town in Bloomfield. Seems our ancestor on that side was actually Danish... he came to North America from Holstein, Denmark by way of Holland prior to 1654. He built a little church in the bush, Harlem area and that's where the family name came from. "Van" (from) "Busch" (woods) "kirk" (church) There's even a coat of arms & a motto. The Nova Scotia VanBuskirks are all decended from his second son.... and all VanBuskirks in Notth America trace their roots back to this preacher. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:24:22 -0500, Skipper wrote:
Len wrote: There is *NO* case of euthanasia if the patient isn't completely sane when he/she asked for it him or herself. BS! There is no such thing as absolutes in these situations. 1 When a doctor helps he has to make the case known to a multidiscipl. comittee. 2 When the doctor helps and doesn't make the case known he'll be prosecuted. This is the same in your country I guess. 3 When the case is made known all aspects are checked. and of course no 1 is "did the patient ask for help in writing". no 2: was there a case of suffering without any hope for improvement of the condition. Judges are doing a good job on defining these terms. Your fear is not rational imo. You should be afraid for the opposite. What do you prefer, a system like this where you can successfully ask for help when YOU need it or a dogmatic NO in all cases where even the saddest lungcancer patient has to suffocate in his own slime? Excuse for becoming that explicit but that's how grewsome (sorry for misspellings) life is at that very moment. But is the fear for getting killed by the government not really an excuse ? So you don't have to point out it's forbidden by the bible? In that case you're totally free in making your own choice. But don't interfere in me making mine... Regards, Len. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:14:17 -0500, Skipper wrote:
Len wrote: In fact I've met several, dozens of canadians in Amsterdam. All kinds of ages. Without an exeption: polite, friendly, easy-connecting, interested in another culture/way of life. No superficiality, no criticising the welfare system, no cowboy-style You got a problem with cowboy style, pardner? Are ya talking to me? Are ya talking to me? ARE YA TALKING TO ME???? Do ya feel lucky punk? Well ???? Do Ya???? Thats what I call cowboy style. And yes it is offensive, rude, dumb, and a lot more but I guess you get my drift. Regards, Len. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Len" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:27:31 -0400, " *JimH*" wrote: But tell me, what was wrong with the series of facts I summed up? The fact that they are not facts. Oh well in that case: good luck with your education. Regards, Len. Strong return argument Len. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reagan was a great leader? Which history books have youy been reading.
The same ones that will say the same things about this idiot, chickenhawk, AWOL deserter bush? Capt. Jeff |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Len" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:01:59 -0400, " *JimH*" wrote: But tell me, what was wrong with the series of facts I summed up? The fact that they are not facts. Oh well in that case: good luck with your education. Regards, Len. Strong return argument Len. There is nothing to return arguments on Jim I agree. What you presented are not fact. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Observations made aboard a TomCat 255 | General |