On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:35:30 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
This is juicy...those damned questioning liberals, eh?

Forging the Case for War
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents?
Joe Wilson.
Nope. Try reading the article. The answer is there.
As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight.
The source is at the bottom of the article.
A link to it was not. Without that what you posted could be nothing
but your words.
Easy enough for you to verify. Surely you know how.

And surely easier for you to post the link to the
source...........surely I know why.

Hey...I don;t care whether you read it or not or believe it or not. As I
said, it is easy enough to verify.

Hey....without a link to verify what you posted as being written by the
author it is nothing but BS.

Why should I have to verify it? You are the one posting it here.


BTW: You have rewritten articles to satisfy your particular views and
presented them here as being original work from the noted author.

Why should anyone believe anything you have since posted here without a link
to the original *unedited* article?


He also tends to leave out pertinent portions of articles. He's done so today.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"bb" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting them as fact,
and of creative editing of content.

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting them as
fact, and of creative editing of content.

Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article (including
the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael Ledeen) and you will
find it is entirely factual.

OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited without
posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing articles
to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being original.

" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
This is juicy...those damned questioning liberals, eh?

Forging the Case for War
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents?

Joe Wilson.

I can't wait until Scooter deposes him. And, if the situation warrants have
good old Joe testify in open court.

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting them as
fact, and of creative editing of content.

Do a search for the principals named (including the Iran-Contra era arms
dealer and Israel sycophant Michael Ledeen) and you will find the article
is quite factual.

The real article and not Harry's interpretation?

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting them
as fact, and of creative editing of content.

Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article
(including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael
Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual.

OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being
quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited
without posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing
articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being
original.

Krause isn't able to compose that many coherent sentences in one sitting.

Why you had to respond with a flame on Harry rather than address my comments
is beyond me.

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no
weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting
them as fact, and of creative editing of content.

Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article
(including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael
Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual.

OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being
quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited
without posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing
articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being
original.

Krause isn't able to compose that many coherent sentences in one
sitting.

Why you had to respond with a flame on Harry rather than address my
comments is beyond me.

Well, if YOU could get your ****ing knuckles off the ground for two
seconds your sorry ****sucking ass might have found this:

http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_11_07/feature.html


Nice mouth. So is that article a reason to flame another member here?

Can't you discuss things without going nuclear?

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting them as
fact, and of creative editing of content.

http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_11_07/feature.html

That's right, Bushblower - American CONSERVATIVE magazine.

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no
weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting
them as fact, and of creative editing of content.

Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article
(including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael
Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual.

OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being
quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited
without posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing
articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being
original.

Krause isn't able to compose that many coherent sentences in one
sitting.

Why you had to respond with a flame on Harry rather than address my
comments is beyond me.

Well, if YOU could get your ****ing knuckles off the ground for two
seconds your sorry ****sucking ass might have found this:

http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_11_07/feature.html


You are beginning to sound like Kevin. Are you proud of that?

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:56:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:

"bb" wrote in message
news On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight.
BS.

bb

BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting them as
fact, and of creative editing of content.
Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article (including
the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael Ledeen) and you will
find it is entirely factual.

OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited without
posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing articles
to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being original.




Giggle.

"When idiots are confused and addled, they tend to laugh nervously".