Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:03:56 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
John H. wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:19:23 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Saddam and many other heads of state are always interested in obtaining all sorts of weaponry and components. That doesn't mean they have them, can get them, can use them if they get them, et cetera. Saddam had WMD. If allowed he would have used them, again. Bush didn't lie about the WMD. Right. Saddam's dog ate them. If Saddam's dog *had* eaten them, there would still have been no lie told by Bush. -- John H "It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!" HK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
OT Bush's flawed reason for war resurfaces | General |