Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:19:23 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Saddam and many other heads of state are always interested in obtaining all sorts of weaponry and components. That doesn't mean they have them, can get them, can use them if they get them, et cetera. Saddam had WMD. If allowed he would have used them, again. Bush didn't lie about the WMD. Right. Saddam's dog ate them. I guess all these folks lied also.......eh? You can repeat that list from now until the end of time, and it won't make a difference. You are one of those libs who never got over losing the last 2 elections and believe in your own mind what you say about Bush and the war, despite it being wrong. You have heard the lies so many times that you now believe them. No amount of evidence will make you change your mind so I guess this discussion ends now. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
Who was behind the Niger uranium documents? | General | |||
OT Bush's flawed reason for war resurfaces | General |