![]() |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
In 1993, Representive Murth urged President Clinton to withdraw our troops
from Somalia: "Our welcome has been worn out," Rep Murtha told NBC's "Today" show in Sept. 1993, after the Mogadishu battle cost the lives of 18 U.S. Rangers. The Pennsylvania Democrat announced that President Clinton had been "listening to our suggestions. And I think you'll see him move those troops out very quickly." In 1996, bin Laden's Declaration of War on the US made specific mention of the 1993 withdrawal of US troops from Somalia. bin Laden used it as propaganda to help recruit more terrorists: "But your most disgraceful case was in Somalia; where- after vigorous propaganda about the power of the USA and its post cold war leadership of the new world order- you moved tens of thousands of international force, including twenty eight thousands American solders into Somalia. However, when tens of your solders were killed in minor battles and one American Pilot was dragged in the streets of Mogadishu you left the area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat and your dead with you. Clinton appeared in front of the whole world threatening and promising revenge , but these threats were merely a preparation for withdrawal. You have been disgraced by Allah and you withdrew; the extent of your impotence and weaknesses became very clear. It was a pleasure for the "heart" of every Muslim and a remedy to the "chests" of believing nations to see you defeated in the three Islamic cities of Beirut , Aden and Mogadishu." Now, in 2005, Murtha wants to repeat the mistake: "I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice that the United States will IMMEDIATELY REDEPLOY. All of Iraq must know that Iraq is free. Free from United States occupation. I believe this will send a signal to the Sunnis to join the political process for the good of a "free" Iraq. My plan calls: To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces. To create a quick reaction force in the region. To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines. To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering. Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our obligation is to speak out for them. That's why I am speaking out. Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME." |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: In 1993, Representive Murth I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? BTW--Today's "Bush Approval rating": Monday November 21, 2005--Forty-five percent (45%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty-four percent (54%) of Americans Disapprove of the President's performance. Among Republicans, 78% give the President their Approval. That view is shared by 19% of Democrats and 36% of those not affiliated with either major political party. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote: I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? Nor does he have comment on the following: "The closer you look at the unions of today, the scummier they look.Those who run the day to day operation of unions are mostly just crooks, assorted ****-ups, scalawags, and ne'er-do-wells. They couldn't hold a job if not for their union position. And now this assortment is demanding control of all our well run company pension funds. Fat chance!" "Now I don't want to come off as anti-union, which I'm not. At one time unions did a great service for America. Unfortunately, leftist whackos like Harry Krause elbowed their way into these unions and seized control from real Americans. You know how these scumbags always insist on things only going their way. They leave no room for divergent opinions. Just look at the mess these leftists have made of the Middle East." "And then there's Carter. He and Stansfield Turner gutted our military and intelligence network. Those with real Middle East intelligence skills were sent packing. We are still paying for Carter's blunders. So, who's fault is it? Johnson? Carter? Or those always anti-Americans on the Looney Left...you know, Harry Krause types." -- Skipper |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:30:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
[snipped] ==================================== So what's the status of the new boat? |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: In 1993, Representive Murth I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? Some people know when to let a country melt down all by itself. I'm sure that some of our representatives thought that leaving would show weakness, which is exactly what OBL said. So what? If your neighbor's marriage is falling apart, do you offer to talk if they need to? Or, do you kick in their front door and tell them you're not leaving until they straighten things out? |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:30:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: [snipped] ==================================== So what's the status of the new boat? Very nice. The generator is getting replaced a week from Friday. The boat runs very well...with a cruise speed of just under 31 mph burning approximately 23 gph. I "detailed" the inside yesterday, and found water in the forward bilge. I located a small crack in a plastic fitting running to the Cruisair raw water pump. I replaced it with a bronze fitting. From now on, I know to close the seacocks that I'm not using...and to inspect them more thoroughly before any long runs. I have to say that it's *very* nice working in the cabin when the air is running. One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. It has something to do with the water pickup, and the possibility that the water flow to the A/C could get disrupted at the higher planing speeds. So the generator and A/C will get used while grouper digging or when trolling...but not on the long runs out to the fishing grounds. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:11:09 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. ============================================== Interesting. I never have that problem with the trawler running at 9 kts. :-) You could probably replace the through hull fitting with a "scoop" type that would actually force water through the A/C at speed, but I suppose there's always the risk of losing cooling water to the generator as well. Fuel burn sounds very reasonable for a boat of that size and speed. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:22:24 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: -- Don't pray in my public schools, and I won't think in your church. Or elsewhere, for that matter. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:11:09 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. ============================================== Interesting. I never have that problem with the trawler running at 9 kts. :-) You could probably replace the through hull fitting with a "scoop" type that would actually force water through the A/C at speed, but I suppose there's always the risk of losing cooling water to the generator as well. I would hope that if the solution was that easy, then Grady would have done it. But sometimes the simplest things are often overlooked. When I get the new lift, I'll look at the bottom of the hull to see if there's a scoop-type pickup. Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? If that's the case, then it wouldn't be a problem in flat seas. Fuel burn sounds very reasonable for a boat of that size and speed. I was pretty happy with it. The performance data that Yamaha lists for their 250 four-strokes gives an optimum cruise of approximately 30 mph, burning approximately 19 gph. That's 1 mph slower, but a 20% improvement in overall fuel burn rate. Of course, I was running with 1800 lbs. of fuel, 250 pounds of water, and 5 people on board...and my boat had the additional weight of the optional generator...plus the drag from all of the eisenglass. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: In 1993, Representive Murth I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? Some people know when to let a country melt down all by itself. I'm sure that some of our representatives thought that leaving would show weakness, which is exactly what OBL said. So what? If your neighbor's marriage is falling apart, do you offer to talk if they need to? Or, do you kick in their front door and tell them you're not leaving until they straighten things out? You are *the* man of off-the-wall analogies. You compare the situation in Somalia to a failing marriage? How would have talking to Aideed helped in Somalia? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com