Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, Harry, I gotta admit, you are as persistant as some of the
real nuts around here. You pass to us, who do not seek that here, the news of our catastrophe, constantly, though you seem to think there is only one cause. There are one or two more votes on one side than the other though, so perhaps it is apathy, not Bush? Cartoons and booze are more fun than intellectual inquiry, unless you are geek. Rather than cry about the sky falling, perhaps we might do better to suggest solutions? I know, I know, "Impeach Bush!" right? But what should his successor do? What needs to be done? What is the real problem in this savage world? After some research (there is never enough, or enough analysts) I see a few salient points that need to be addressed: 1. Oil is "the Devil's excrement." even according to those who have it, and those who cannot defend their possessions against rapacious plunderers. It's use seems to have caused global warming, though solar output may be far more influential. We need alternatives, yet those with the power and money have not yet helped. Like in the case of the Avro Arrow, GM is demolishing it's successful EV1 electric cars, possibly because the invested technology of seperate drive trains does not permit full exploitaion of e-wheel drive and brake regeneration systems in a smooth transition, or because, as suggested on Discovery channel, they will not require enough in the way of profitable replacement or repair parts as they age, if ever. A good e-car could be expected last a very long time. How slowly can GM conduct this basic technology platform change, and how to maintain the wealth of those who fear change and innovative investment? Will we see an announcement out of the blue that new tech, tiny, efficient, home charged e-cars are suddeny available, and cheap? Who owns GM? Could it be an oil tycoon, concerned for his vertically integrated transport energy empire? Does he conspire to oppose nuclear power for some reason? 2. Hatred fills the hearts of many, especially those who feel dispossessed, like Aboriginal peoples, "liberated" descendants of imported slaves, and those with local minority religious beliefs. Will Canadian government fiscal efforts to placate Indians with legitimate claims result in larger, more wasteful Indian affairs bureaucracies, or benefit those who are still imprisoned on reserves? 3. The Logic Of The Universe (LOTU) seems to indicate that religious organisations, and their inadequately guarded literature, possibly inspired at some point, inevitably become polluted by avaricious humans who see organisations generally as tools to be exploited to aggrandize themselves. 40 years ago, a man suggested that evolution was one of God's tools for the construction of this existance. In ignorance, I too invented that concept (independantly, I think) 30 years ago, unaware that He would get a Nobel peace prize for this concept as it offers an avenue to reconcile faith and science. I am glad to think I am not the only one who can think. I am ashamed to admit my memory for names, possibly a result of my upbringing, does not permit me to name this individual. 4. Most do not think, only regurgitate what they are forced to in schools run by petty tyrants who do not allow students to think, as my science teacher 40 years ago illustrated to me when I proposed a slightly different tack (boating reference) to explain the chemistry and physics of lead acid batteries. I thought it was easier to explain from the initial point of view of lead and acid chemical reactions. He insisted the road to enlightenment could only start with textbook lessons that an accumulated charge forcing certain interactions culminated in a chemical reaction. I did not do well in school, because I was rebellious and an independant thinker, and asked questions others could not answer, causing my unpopularity as a result of public ridicule. New chemistry developed lithium batteries as inherently much better. 5. It seems clear water is going to become more critical than oil, and sooner than would be best, if one can see what is happening ever so slowly, whatever the cause. Climate change, excessive meat production and consumption, agricultural waste of water, toilet use, and landfills full of poisons from old tyres, batteries, insecticides, diapers, and heavy metals, etc. are accumulating as persistant effects on our water. So, now I ask you to tell me what can be done, when we are free to think without fear about alternatives to the oil structure, who's product is far too valuable to burn. Hydrocarbons offer plastics strong and light and durable enough to make steel obsolete, along with gasoline and diesel fuels. I tire. Terry K |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rename of this newsgroup ? | General | |||
This newsgroup is at least 71% off topic posts - TAKE IT SOMEPLACE ELSE! | General | |||
Harry's Dilemma | General | |||
is this a newsgroup about boats? | General |