Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
A week ago a few of us were discussing HD television sets.
In the meantime my mom's older Sears 27" is starting to act up & I was trying to convince her to buy a LCD version. Yesterday, my JVC 27" went south. I've had a bad solder connection for years....since just after the 3 year warranty expired. All I had to do was slap it upside the case and it straightened out. Now, after a few minutes, all I have is about a half inch high picture stretched across the middle of the screen. I'm guessing it's the horizontal hold control. Anyway the TV is 8 years old and I'm anxious to upgrade to HD so I dug out my Consumer Reports magazines and started reading. To my surprise, they say the newer HD CRT sets have the best picture, give the best black contrast, better viewing from any angle and have a proven reliability record...... plus they are half the price of LED sets. I called a local SONY store and the salesperson confirmed that this is true...she stated that the best HD CRT set was better than their new Bravia LCD model...which is darn good. The downside of course is the size of the unit (depth) and the substantial weight. That store is sold out of the 30" wide screen model I want until the end of the month. I'll start shopping around. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: A week ago a few of us were discussing HD television sets. In the meantime my mom's older Sears 27" is starting to act up & I was trying to convince her to buy a LCD version. Yesterday, my JVC 27" went south. I've had a bad solder connection for years....since just after the 3 year warranty expired. All I had to do was slap it upside the case and it straightened out. Now, after a few minutes, all I have is about a half inch high picture stretched across the middle of the screen. I'm guessing it's the horizontal hold control. Anyway the TV is 8 years old and I'm anxious to upgrade to HD so I dug out my Consumer Reports magazines and started reading. To my surprise, they say the newer HD CRT sets have the best picture, give the best black contrast, better viewing from any angle and have a proven reliability record...... plus they are half the price of LED sets. I called a local SONY store and the salesperson confirmed that this is true...she stated that the best HD CRT set was better than their new Bravia LCD model...which is darn good. The downside of course is the size of the unit (depth) and the substantial weight. That store is sold out of the 30" wide screen model I want until the end of the month. I'll start shopping around. There's really nothing better than a really good CRT HD if what you are The thing I really like about CRT HD is the wide viewing angle. Most LCD's have quite a narrow angle, you need to just about be in front of it, and at the right height. My brother in law got a huge LCD wall mounted unit, only to find out that he couldn't sit on the floor with his kids and watch it! |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
Eisboch wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: A week ago a few of us were discussing HD television sets. In the meantime my mom's older Sears 27" is starting to act up & I was trying to convince her to buy a LCD version. Yesterday, my JVC 27" went south. I've had a bad solder connection for years....since just after the 3 year warranty expired. All I had to do was slap it upside the case and it straightened out. Now, after a few minutes, all I have is about a half inch high picture stretched across the middle of the screen. I'm guessing it's the horizontal hold control. Anyway the TV is 8 years old and I'm anxious to upgrade to HD so I dug out my Consumer Reports magazines and started reading. To my surprise, they say the newer HD CRT sets have the best picture, give the best black contrast, better viewing from any angle and have a proven reliability record...... plus they are half the price of LED sets. I called a local SONY store and the salesperson confirmed that this is true...she stated that the best HD CRT set was better than their new Bravia LCD model...which is darn good. The downside of course is the size of the unit (depth) and the substantial weight. That store is sold out of the 30" wide screen model I want until the end of the month. I'll start shopping around. There's really nothing better than a really good CRT HD if what you are The thing I really like about CRT HD is the wide viewing angle. Most LCD's have quite a narrow angle, you need to just about be in front of it, and at the right height. My brother in law got a huge LCD wall mounted unit, only to find out that he couldn't sit on the floor with his kids and watch it! If you are checking out LCD HDTVs... look at the Sony Bravia. I walked side to side and it was great at all viewing angles. Very pricy though. I figure by the time I wear out a new HD Wide Screen CRT set (6-8 years), LCDs should be much improved and more reasonably priced. Some of the Sony displays utilize a multi-layer coating by 3M that reduces glare and enhances the brightness of the display. Many LCD displays use a dipped, Gel type anti-reflection coating. The 3-M coating, although superior, is more expensive to apply. I recently "retired" an old, 32-inch JVC color TV monitor that had an absolutely beautiful display. Colors were natural and rich, better than any of the new LCD or Plasma displays that I've seen. It didn't have a tuner - it was just a monitor and was "on" all the time, displaying a black screen unless it was getting a video input. It finally died and when I pulled it out (weighed about 200 lbs) I noticed the date of manufacture ..... Nov, 1988. Eisboch That's the other important consideration. Proven reliability vs ??. Consumer Reports says 1 year old LCDs have been very reliable....but can't comment on long term durability. When I was working, our technicians would keep the monitors on year after year unless something failed. Seems the act of turning off & on might slightly stress certain components. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
Don White wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: A week ago a few of us were discussing HD television sets. In the meantime my mom's older Sears 27" is starting to act up & I was trying to convince her to buy a LCD version. Yesterday, my JVC 27" went south. I've had a bad solder connection for years....since just after the 3 year warranty expired. All I had to do was slap it upside the case and it straightened out. Now, after a few minutes, all I have is about a half inch high picture stretched across the middle of the screen. I'm guessing it's the horizontal hold control. Anyway the TV is 8 years old and I'm anxious to upgrade to HD so I dug out my Consumer Reports magazines and started reading. To my surprise, they say the newer HD CRT sets have the best picture, give the best black contrast, better viewing from any angle and have a proven reliability record...... plus they are half the price of LED sets. I called a local SONY store and the salesperson confirmed that this is true...she stated that the best HD CRT set was better than their new Bravia LCD model...which is darn good. The downside of course is the size of the unit (depth) and the substantial weight. That store is sold out of the 30" wide screen model I want until the end of the month. I'll start shopping around. There's really nothing better than a really good CRT HD if what you are The thing I really like about CRT HD is the wide viewing angle. Most LCD's have quite a narrow angle, you need to just about be in front of it, and at the right height. My brother in law got a huge LCD wall mounted unit, only to find out that he couldn't sit on the floor with his kids and watch it! If you are checking out LCD HDTVs... look at the Sony Bravia. I walked side to side and it was great at all viewing angles. Very pricy though. I figure by the time I wear out a new HD Wide Screen CRT set (6-8 years), LCDs should be much improved and more reasonably priced. Some of the Sony displays utilize a multi-layer coating by 3M that reduces glare and enhances the brightness of the display. Many LCD displays use a dipped, Gel type anti-reflection coating. The 3-M coating, although superior, is more expensive to apply. I recently "retired" an old, 32-inch JVC color TV monitor that had an absolutely beautiful display. Colors were natural and rich, better than any of the new LCD or Plasma displays that I've seen. It didn't have a tuner - it was just a monitor and was "on" all the time, displaying a black screen unless it was getting a video input. It finally died and when I pulled it out (weighed about 200 lbs) I noticed the date of manufacture ..... Nov, 1988. Eisboch That's the other important consideration. Proven reliability vs ??. Consumer Reports says 1 year old LCDs have been very reliable....but can't comment on long term durability. When I was working, our technicians would keep the monitors on year after year unless something failed. Seems the act of turning off & on might slightly stress certain components. They estimate a perfect LCD or plasma will last about 10 yrs. -- Reggie ****** |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message news They estimate a perfect LCD or plasma will last about 10 yrs. -- Reggie ****** Samsung claims that the plasma display of their units will last 60,000 hours or approximately 26 years using it an average of 6 hours a day. It makes sense to me given that the plasma pixel is simply a contained mini cell of gas that becomes ionized when used. In the process of ionization light is emitted. Once the ionizing potential is removed, the gas reverts back to it's original state. There is no consumable component as long as the gas does not leak out. Conventional cathode ray tubes emit electrons from a filament that eventually will break or simply thin to a point of becoming unusable. Other components (power supplies, etc.) will crap out long before then. Eisboch |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
Eisboch wrote:
"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message news They estimate a perfect LCD or plasma will last about 10 yrs. -- Reggie ****** Samsung claims that the plasma display of their units will last 60,000 hours or approximately 26 years using it an average of 6 hours a day. It makes sense to me given that the plasma pixel is simply a contained mini cell of gas that becomes ionized when used. In the process of ionization light is emitted. Once the ionizing potential is removed, the gas reverts back to it's original state. There is no consumable component as long as the gas does not leak out. Conventional cathode ray tubes emit electrons from a filament that eventually will break or simply thin to a point of becoming unusable. Other components (power supplies, etc.) will crap out long before then. Eisboch Richard, I had a salesman tell me the expected life of both plasma and LCD was 8 - 10 yrs. Since I couldn't imagine them underestimated the life, I went searching on the Internet to see what I could find. It seems the manufacturer. orginally underestimated the lifespan. According to this article, you are basically correct. They did disagree that the gas reverts back to the original state, they state it will lose it's brightness over time, but very gradually, after 50,000 hrs, it will be at 50% of brightness. By that time, we be watching hologram TV. http://www.plasmatvbuyingguide.com/p...matv-life.html http://www.plasmatvbuyingguide.com/p...-lifespan.html -- Reggie ****** |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT You were right Harry!
Reggie Smithers wrote:
Eisboch wrote: Samsung claims that the plasma display of their units will last 60,000 hours or approximately 26 years using it an average of 6 hours a day. It makes sense to me given that the plasma pixel is simply a contained mini cell of gas that becomes ionized when used. In the process of ionization light is emitted. Once the ionizing potential is removed, the gas reverts back to it's original state. There is no consumable component as long as the gas does not leak out. Conventional cathode ray tubes emit electrons from a filament that eventually will break or simply thin to a point of becoming unusable. Other components (power supplies, etc.) will crap out long before then. Richard, I had a salesman tell me the expected life of both plasma and LCD was 8 - 10 yrs. Since I couldn't imagine them underestimated the life, I went searching on the Internet to see what I could find. It seems the manufacturer. orginally underestimated the lifespan. According to this article, you are basically correct. They did disagree that the gas reverts back to the original state, they state it will lose it's brightness over time, but very gradually, after 50,000 hrs, it will be at 50% of brightness. By that time, we be watching hologram TV. http://www.plasmatvbuyingguide.com/p...matv-life.html http://www.plasmatvbuyingguide.com/p...-lifespan.html There is also quite a bulb cost delta between the technologies. Have been told the current best value is Samsung's 50" DLP. -- Skipper |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Truth About Harry | General | |||
Harry Has Had A Productive Morning | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
Harry and Chuckie | General |