Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Nute
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stingray?

I'm starting to shop for an 18-19 foot I/O and the Stingray 185LX is looking
interesting. I don't think it's in the upper half of the range
quality-wise, but then again can't find a lot of talk about it.

Anyone have experience with Stingrays? Even opinions.

Thanks
Nute



  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Wayne.B
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stingray?

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:56:20 -0600, "Nute" wrote:

Anyone have experience with Stingrays? Even opinions.


I rented one once for an afternoon. It looked like 40 miles of bad
road and didn't run all that well but it was a rental boat after all,
and had probably been run hard and put away wet.

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
John Chaplain
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stingray?

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:56:20 -0600, "Nute" wrote:

I'm starting to shop for an 18-19 foot I/O and the Stingray 185LX is looking
interesting. I don't think it's in the upper half of the range
quality-wise, but then again can't find a lot of talk about it.

Anyone have experience with Stingrays? Even opinions.

Thanks
Nute


I have owned a Stingray 2002 240CS for about 3 seasons now and it has
been just fine. As you noticed, it's not on the top end of the quality
line, more like lower end, but it is a very nice appearing boat,
handles really well, very seaworthy ( Atlantic off New England,) and
suites my needs just fine.

http://www.stingrayboats.com/product...hp?model=240cs

It's the little crap with this boat where the quality problems come
through...nothing structually major, just loose screws, screws that
are too long, some hardware thats a bit cheap. Little quality problems
that are fixable like some rain leaking in around windows and cheap
window screens. I had one seat come apart due to shoddy workmanship
but that was a pretty easy fix. All in all, I've had no major problems
and I really like the boat. For what I paid new ( about 36k for a new
24 foot boat 5L Mercuiser with galvanized tandem trailer and some good
options like full camper canvas ) it's hard to match another new boat
in that price range. Also look at the Rinker boats too. They are in
the same category. I think Stingrays are far better on quality and
design than Bayliners, but also well below Maxums.

My Stingray is sort of a Barbie boat since it has all the vinyl seats,
but it is nice on a sunny summer day to have those reclining cushy
seats. ( The ladies like that. ) and then I switch out the back seat
to a plywood seat with a tank rack to make it into a very adequate
scuba diving boat. The carpets snap in and out too ( nice option.)

If I was looking for more a a fishing boat I wouldn't want the vinyl
seats and a boat like a Parker or a Grady White would be a good way to
go. It's all good, you just have to decide what you want in a boat.

John C.



  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Nute
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stingray?

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:52:49 -0500, John Chaplain John
wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:56:20 -0600, "Nute" wrote:

I'm starting to shop for an 18-19 foot I/O and the Stingray 185LX is looking
interesting. I don't think it's in the upper half of the range
quality-wise, but then again can't find a lot of talk about it.

Anyone have experience with Stingrays? Even opinions.

Thanks
Nute


I have owned a Stingray 2002 240CS for about 3 seasons now and it has
been just fine. As you noticed, it's not on the top end of the quality
line, more like lower end, but it is a very nice appearing boat,
handles really well, very seaworthy ( Atlantic off New England,) and
suites my needs just fine.

http://www.stingrayboats.com/product...hp?model=240cs

It's the little crap with this boat where the quality problems come
through...nothing structually major, just loose screws, screws that
are too long, some hardware thats a bit cheap. Little quality problems
that are fixable like some rain leaking in around windows and cheap
window screens. I had one seat come apart due to shoddy workmanship
but that was a pretty easy fix. All in all, I've had no major problems
and I really like the boat. For what I paid new ( about 36k for a new
24 foot boat 5L Mercuiser with galvanized tandem trailer and some good
options like full camper canvas ) it's hard to match another new boat
in that price range. Also look at the Rinker boats too. They are in
the same category. I think Stingrays are far better on quality and
design than Bayliners, but also well below Maxums.

My Stingray is sort of a Barbie boat since it has all the vinyl seats,
but it is nice on a sunny summer day to have those reclining cushy
seats. ( The ladies like that. ) and then I switch out the back seat
to a plywood seat with a tank rack to make it into a very adequate
scuba diving boat. The carpets snap in and out too ( nice option.)

If I was looking for more a a fishing boat I wouldn't want the vinyl
seats and a boat like a Parker or a Grady White would be a good way to
go. It's all good, you just have to decide what you want in a boat.

John C.




Thanks for the comments, John. Nice looking boat you have there.

Nute

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jack Redington
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stingray?

Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:56:20 -0600, "Nute" wrote:


Anyone have experience with Stingrays? Even opinions.



I rented one once for an afternoon. It looked like 40 miles of bad
road and didn't run all that well but it was a rental boat after all,
and had probably been run hard and put away wet.


A buddy of mine had 190rs? with a 4.6 V6. The hull they called a
Z-Plane. The thing would go 50 mph and flat water. And beat you to death
on any type of wave action.

Capt Jack R..



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
John Chaplain
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stingray?


A buddy of mine had 190rs? with a 4.6 V6. The hull they called a
Z-Plane. The thing would go 50 mph and flat water. And beat you to death
on any type of wave action.

Capt Jack R..


I don't think the zhull makes much difference. I think thats more
marketing bs.
My 240cs will do 50 on flat water and is a solid ride in the waves.

Like any boat, trim tabs are what make the difference in getting on
plane and really help riding out smaller waves at speed.

John C.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jack Redington
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stingray?

John Chaplain wrote:

A buddy of mine had 190rs? with a 4.6 V6. The hull they called a
Z-Plane. The thing would go 50 mph and flat water. And beat you to death
on any type of wave action.

Capt Jack R..



I don't think the zhull makes much difference. I think thats more
marketing bs.
My 240cs will do 50 on flat water and is a solid ride in the waves.

Like any boat, trim tabs are what make the difference in getting on
plane and really help riding out smaller waves at speed.

John C.

I think you make a valid point, but my buddies 190rs would go pretty
slow and stay on plane. Of course it could go slower with tabs, no doubt
about that. The only thing I recall from riding in it is that even small
wakes were unpleasant.

The 240cs is most likely a very different boat, one that I have never
been on. Thus my comment was only aimed at my experiance with the 190rs
bowrider. And that is the onlt Stingray I have ever been on.

Capt Jack R..

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017