Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fred Dehl" wrote in message ... wrote in ups.com: Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing... Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". Why would I permit unsupervised minors to operate a boat? A 16 year old can go drive the car without an adult in it. Most of the teak surfing deaths are probably the 18-30's. And I and my friends got to drive the boats with out adults aboard 45-50 years ago, and few did not survive the experience. First fatal accident I saw, was a 25 year old drunk, that left the dock full throttle in a Vee drive and ran over a couple in a small fishing boat while still in the 5 mph zone. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. The biggest problem the state of Washington has is it's full time legislature. Washingtonians should adopt Oregon's model....meet every other summer. Since our summers are so short, legislators are in a rush to finish the job and get home. Net result is efficiency....no time for nonsense. -Greg |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dene" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. The biggest problem the state of Washington has is it's full time legislature. Washingtonians should adopt Oregon's model....meet every other summer. Since our summers are so short, legislators are in a rush to finish the job and get home. Net result is efficiency....no time for nonsense. -Greg Biggest error we made in California is letting Jessie Unruh convience us we needed a full time legislature. |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dene wrote: The biggest problem the state of Washington has is it's full time legislature. Washingtonians should adopt Oregon's model....meet every other summer. Since our summers are so short, legislators are in a rush to finish the job and get home. Net result is efficiency....no time for nonsense. -Greg We don't have a full time legislature. The legislature meets for a few weeks each spring, (usually out of session by March or April), and the legislators earn about $30,000 per year- (if I recall correctly). For most of the lawyers, business execs, etc who are serving in the legislature $10,000 a month is a pretty serious pay cut- not to mention how it their absence messes up a professional practice or a business. Do you feel there should not be a law against teak sufing? |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 07:48:05 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. there are laws against drink operating - less than 10% of people operating a boat drunk are caught. there are laws concerning the operation of boats by those under 16 - i can't tell you how many 12 to 16 yo kids i see on pwcs and pwc type boats operating in state parks of all things - theres a law against that too. oh, lets talk about operating with kids aboard w/o life preservers - theres a law about that i think. its still saving people from themselves. whats next - no bungee jumping? sky diving? snowboarding? soccer? baseball? people get seriously injured in those sports all the time - in particular soccer where serious knee/ankle and head injuries occur on a regular basis. bungee jumping, sky diving, snowboarding, soccer, baseball etc are all ordinarily survivable. sucking in CO fumes almost directly from the exhaust port usuallly is not. it is what it is chuck - just another grandstand play by some small time politician making a name for themselves under the guise of public safety. its bull**** of the first order and just another way to produce revenue along the way. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Dene wrote: The biggest problem the state of Washington has is it's full time legislature. Washingtonians should adopt Oregon's model....meet every other summer. Since our summers are so short, legislators are in a rush to finish the job and get home. Net result is efficiency....no time for nonsense. -Greg We don't have a full time legislature. The legislature meets for a few weeks each spring, (usually out of session by March or April), and the legislators earn about $30,000 per year- (if I recall correctly). For most of the lawyers, business execs, etc who are serving in the legislature $10,000 a month is a pretty serious pay cut- not to mention how it their absence messes up a professional practice or a business. I stand corrected. Your legislature should meet every other year. ; Do you feel there should not be a law against teak sufing? Honestly....I have no idea. -Greg |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 07:48:05 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. there are laws against drink operating - less than 10% of people operating a boat drunk are caught. there are laws concerning the operation of boats by those under 16 - i can't tell you how many 12 to 16 yo kids i see on pwcs and pwc type boats operating in state parks of all things - theres a law against that too. oh, lets talk about operating with kids aboard w/o life preservers - theres a law about that i think. its still saving people from themselves. whats next - no bungee jumping? sky diving? snowboarding? soccer? baseball? people get seriously injured in those sports all the time - in particular soccer where serious knee/ankle and head injuries occur on a regular basis. bungee jumping, sky diving, snowboarding, soccer, baseball etc are all ordinarily survivable. sucking in CO fumes almost directly from the exhaust port usuallly is not. it is what it is chuck - just another grandstand play by some small time politician making a name for themselves under the guise of public safety. its bull**** of the first order and just another way to produce revenue along the way. Chuck, The reason teak surfing is popular is very few people who do it are killed or end up in the hospital. If 25% - 50% of the people who teak surfed died, it would no longer be popular. Yes there are some who do die or go to the hospital, but the vast majority survive, and if the CO damages brain cells, they are too stupid to realize it. I really don't care if they make it illegal, but any parent who owned a boat and did not let the kids know the danger is just as dumb as the kids. Drugs are illegal and they are still used and abused. I for one wished they would legalize all drugs. All illegal drugs do is create a very profitable business for criminals, force drug users to commit crimes to support their expensive habits and divert police resources to fight a war we will never win. It didn't work for alcohol, it isn't working for drugs. Making Teak Surfing illegal will not eliminate teak surfing anymore than making drugs illegal eliminated drug abuse. -- Reggie ************************************************** ************* That's my story and I am sticking to it. ************************************************** ************* |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
. .. I for one wished they would legalize all drugs. All illegal drugs do is create a very profitable business for criminals, force drug users to commit crimes to support their expensive habits and divert police resources to fight a war we will never win. It didn't work for alcohol, it isn't working for drugs. Criminals don't make the laws. You need to look beyond them to understand why drugs are illegal. It has to benefit *someone* financially. Typically, that would be our legislators. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "Reggie Smithers" wrote in message . .. I for one wished they would legalize all drugs. All illegal drugs do is create a very profitable business for criminals, force drug users to commit crimes to support their expensive habits and divert police resources to fight a war we will never win. It didn't work for alcohol, it isn't working for drugs. Criminals don't make the laws. You need to look beyond them to understand why drugs are illegal. It has to benefit *someone* financially. Typically, that would be our legislators. I wouldn't "legalize" all drugs, but I'd sure support decriminalization for possession of small amounts and for use. There are some drugs out there that are just too potent and cause too much damage to be in anyone's possession. One example is crystal meth. Oh please....hard liquor will wreck your body if used incorrectly. My brother in law tried to stop his heavy drinking without medical assistance. Apparently, the DTs can reach a point where they're like grand mal seizures. In his case, it stopped his heart. He was found dead in a cheap motel room. 45 years old, IIRC. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General |