Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh please....hard liquor will wreck your body if used incorrectly.
Sure, use the excuse that since that's already legal then it oughta be OK for more. Puh-leeze. He was found dead in a cheap motel room. 45 years old, IIRC. Thus voting himself off the island. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Kearney" wrote in message t... Oh please....hard liquor will wreck your body if used incorrectly. Sure, use the excuse that since that's already legal then it oughta be OK for more. Puh-leeze. It's pretty obvious to emergency room doctors that keeping these drugs illegal doesn't do much to keep them out of the hands of people who want them. Here's a true or false issue for you: The primary effect of making drugs illegal is to create an environment of violence surrounding the trafficking in these drugs, which is more dangerous to the public than the drugs themselves. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Bill Kearney" wrote in message t... Oh please....hard liquor will wreck your body if used incorrectly. Sure, use the excuse that since that's already legal then it oughta be OK for more. Puh-leeze. It's pretty obvious to emergency room doctors that keeping these drugs illegal doesn't do much to keep them out of the hands of people who want them. Here's a true or false issue for you: The primary effect of making drugs illegal is to create an environment of violence surrounding the trafficking in these drugs, which is more dangerous to the public than the drugs themselves. Since many drugs are delivered to US shores via boats, I think this is an on topic discussion so I will answer the question. True. -- Reggie ************************************************** ************* That's my story and I am sticking to it. ************************************************** ************* |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Jan 2006 19:33:09 -0800, wrote:
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 07:48:05 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. there are laws against drink operating - less than 10% of people operating a boat drunk are caught. there are laws concerning the operation of boats by those under 16 - i can't tell you how many 12 to 16 yo kids i see on pwcs and pwc type boats operating in state parks of all things - theres a law against that too. oh, lets talk about operating with kids aboard w/o life preservers - theres a law about that i think. its still saving people from themselves. whats next - no bungee jumping? sky diving? snowboarding? soccer? baseball? people get seriously injured in those sports all the time - in particular soccer where serious knee/ankle and head injuries occur on a regular basis. bungee jumping, sky diving, snowboarding, soccer, baseball etc are all ordinarily survivable. sucking in CO fumes almost directly from the exhaust port usuallly is not. it is what it is chuck - just another grandstand play by some small time politician making a name for themselves under the guise of public safety. its bull**** of the first order and just another way to produce revenue along the way. Chuck - I haven't forgotten the peanuts. It's just that the boiled ones are a little harder to come by then I thought. I'm going down to Richmond tomorrow to see the daughter. Hopefully I'll be able to pick 'em up there. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Reggie Smithers wrote: .. Chuck, The reason teak surfing is popular is very few people who do it are killed or end up in the hospital. If 25% - 50% of the people who teak surfed died, it would no longer be popular. Yes there are some who do die or go to the hospital, but the vast majority survive, and if the CO damages brain cells, they are too stupid to realize it. I really don't care if they make it illegal, but any parent who owned a boat and did not let the kids know the danger is just as dumb as the kids. Drugs are illegal and they are still used and abused. I for one wished they would legalize all drugs. All illegal drugs do is create a very profitable business for criminals, force drug users to commit crimes to support their expensive habits and divert police resources to fight a war we will never win. It didn't work for alcohol, it isn't working for drugs. Making Teak Surfing illegal will not eliminate teak surfing anymore than making drugs illegal eliminated drug abuse. -- Reggie Using your drug analogy: When was the last time you heard of a syringe manufacturer being sued by the surviving family of an OD'd addict because some junkie used the rig to shoot himself to death? You don't- and the reason is because the use of heroin is illegal. Manufacturers and insurance companies usually aren't liable for damages done to people who are not only using the product unwisely, but illegally. (That's been the central argument in a lot of successful defenses by firearms companies as well). Without a law against teak surfing, a lot of these ignorant parents will go to court after a son or daughter is killed by the activity and a lot of ignorant judges and juries will award millions or hundreds of millions of dollars damages. We will all see that in our insurance bills, it might even result in the redesign of boat exhaust....(how about a 7-foot vertical dry stack on every runabout? how about the elimination of swim platforms entirely?)....and the greatest impact of these idiots sucking in exhaust while hanging onto a swim platform will be the cumulative effect on the rest of society rather than the tragic death of an uninformed or reckless kid. If you can't support making it illegal so that law enforcement can force the activity to stop when observed and save a few lives along the way, perhaps you might consider supporting such a law to save the rest of the boating public a lot of money and additional government interference in the pastime. A law against teak surfing only affects those idiots who want to do it. And their friends and families. A bunch of them will do it anyway, (and their deaths will be a tragedy), but if they're doing something illegal when they die it is less likely to blow back on the legal and comparatively safe aspects of the pastime that are enjoyed by millions. Pros: 1. A few deaths might be prevented by law enforcement 2. It will make it harder to sue boat manufacturers 3. Less chance of unnecessary and goofy mandatory boat modifications Cons: There will be a new law that restricts a dangerous behavior that isn't constitutionally protected and that you, I, and 99% of people would never consider engaging in, anyway. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 19:33:09 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 07:48:05 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. there are laws against drink operating - less than 10% of people operating a boat drunk are caught. there are laws concerning the operation of boats by those under 16 - i can't tell you how many 12 to 16 yo kids i see on pwcs and pwc type boats operating in state parks of all things - theres a law against that too. oh, lets talk about operating with kids aboard w/o life preservers - theres a law about that i think. its still saving people from themselves. whats next - no bungee jumping? sky diving? snowboarding? soccer? baseball? people get seriously injured in those sports all the time - in particular soccer where serious knee/ankle and head injuries occur on a regular basis. bungee jumping, sky diving, snowboarding, soccer, baseball etc are all ordinarily survivable. sucking in CO fumes almost directly from the exhaust port usuallly is not. teak surfing is ordinarily survivable too. bum argument. Let's say that 1% of teak surfers die and another 10% of repeat teak surfers are permanently impaired. Probably about the same impairment percentage associated with the repeated huffing and sniffing of glues and aerosols. Deaths to baseball and soccer players are almost unheard of. If 1% of snowboarders died, there would be 2-3 deaths at even a moderate ski resort every day, all winter. With the possible exception of bungee jumping, those are all organized sports with rules and regulations imposed for safe and proper use of the equipment. Example: When playing baseball it would be a lot easier to steal bases if the players weren't required to surrender the bat after hitting the ball. I player A is trying to slide into 2nd and player B is standing next to the bag ready to tag him with the ball, player A might avoid the tag if he had the option to beat player B senseless with the bat. We could just give everybody a club and let them whack each other's brians out, (might improve ticket sales).............or we can have some "rules" that make the sport safe and enjoyable for players and spectators alike. If baseball was not self-regulating, there would be laws of all types in place dictating how two rival groups of guys, drinking beer on a Saturday afternoon, would play together while throwing solid objects around at high speeds and swinging clubs. Teak surfing is not self regualting, and waiting for all the idiots to die is not the best course to take, IMO. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JohnH wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 19:33:09 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 07:48:05 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. there are laws against drink operating - less than 10% of people operating a boat drunk are caught. there are laws concerning the operation of boats by those under 16 - i can't tell you how many 12 to 16 yo kids i see on pwcs and pwc type boats operating in state parks of all things - theres a law against that too. oh, lets talk about operating with kids aboard w/o life preservers - theres a law about that i think. its still saving people from themselves. whats next - no bungee jumping? sky diving? snowboarding? soccer? baseball? people get seriously injured in those sports all the time - in particular soccer where serious knee/ankle and head injuries occur on a regular basis. bungee jumping, sky diving, snowboarding, soccer, baseball etc are all ordinarily survivable. sucking in CO fumes almost directly from the exhaust port usuallly is not. it is what it is chuck - just another grandstand play by some small time politician making a name for themselves under the guise of public safety. its bull**** of the first order and just another way to produce revenue along the way. Chuck - I haven't forgotten the peanuts. It's just that the boiled ones are a little harder to come by then I thought. I'm going down to Richmond tomorrow to see the daughter. Hopefully I'll be able to pick 'em up there. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** No big deal. If you want to send something other than boiled, that would be just fine. Thanks for remembering. |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jan 2006 12:12:33 -0800, wrote:
JohnH wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 19:33:09 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 07:48:05 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 19:16:40 -0800, wrote: Senator Pam Roach has sponsored Senate Bill 6364 to ban "teak surfing". She was prompted by one of her constituent organizations, the East Pierce County Fire and Rescue. This agency had dealt with two tragic deaths on Lake Tapps due to teak surfing. oh for petes sake - another do-gooder who wants to save people from themselves. do they seriously think a law is going to stop this type of activity? ill bet there is a fine attached to this - just another revenue raiser for the state. another useless piece of legislation. Actually, not just "another piece of useless legislation" designed to generate fines. Right now, if a cop sees some 16 year old kid running a boat while some 14 or 15 year old is teak surfing, about all the cop can do is pull them over and give them a lecture about safety. Of course once the cop is out of sight, the allure of teak surfing is immediately tripled, because not only is it some sort of fun, but now it's also borderline dangerous *and* it ****es off the cops. If there's a law, the cops can go as far as arresting the operator, if need be, to see that the teak surfing stops. There's a difference between being mentally defective ("should be removed from the gene pool") and uninformed. A lot of teak surfers are probably kids who don't ordinarily spend a lot of time around boats, and when "all" their friends are doing it they just assume it's a normal activity. Here's hoping you never answer a knock on your door to learn that a kid or a grandkid was killed while doing something others would consider "stupid". My bet is that the last thought to cross your mind would be, "Oh, well. If they were that stupid they didn't deserve to live in the first place and it's a good thing they died before they could reproduce." We're talking actual lives here, not some abstract talk show platitude. there are laws against drink operating - less than 10% of people operating a boat drunk are caught. there are laws concerning the operation of boats by those under 16 - i can't tell you how many 12 to 16 yo kids i see on pwcs and pwc type boats operating in state parks of all things - theres a law against that too. oh, lets talk about operating with kids aboard w/o life preservers - theres a law about that i think. its still saving people from themselves. whats next - no bungee jumping? sky diving? snowboarding? soccer? baseball? people get seriously injured in those sports all the time - in particular soccer where serious knee/ankle and head injuries occur on a regular basis. bungee jumping, sky diving, snowboarding, soccer, baseball etc are all ordinarily survivable. sucking in CO fumes almost directly from the exhaust port usuallly is not. it is what it is chuck - just another grandstand play by some small time politician making a name for themselves under the guise of public safety. its bull**** of the first order and just another way to produce revenue along the way. Chuck - I haven't forgotten the peanuts. It's just that the boiled ones are a little harder to come by then I thought. I'm going down to Richmond tomorrow to see the daughter. Hopefully I'll be able to pick 'em up there. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** No big deal. If you want to send something other than boiled, that would be just fine. Thanks for remembering. No way. Boiled you wanted, boiled you get! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General |