Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This NG has is going through challenging times. Where once it was the
predominant boating NG populated by many industry experts, it has now become little more than an off-topic chatroom. Most of truly knowledgeable have long since abandoned this forum for saner climes. Where once the very best advice could be found here, now serious questions will most likely be greeted with flame. Perhaps the time has come to convert rec.boats to a moderated NG and restore its previous image. Yes, I know it would be a daunting task. To win, the proposal must have 100 more YES votes than NO votes and two/thirds of the votes must be YES. We could announce the proposal in *all* the boating groups. The moderation could be set up to recognize white contributors and black contributors. Thus automating 95% of the moderation tasks. New contributors could be hand moderated until they've posted two or three times. Moderators could be voted on by the group, and a committee would have to agree before a contributor was blacklisted (we don't need a BoaterEd). Open on-topic debate WOULD be encouraged. Should you be interested in seeing this forum as a moderated NG respond in this thread. If there is enough support we'll just grab hold of the tiger's tail and run with it. -- Skipper |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skipper" wrote in message ... Perhaps the time has come to convert rec.boats to a moderated NG and restore its previous image. Yes, I know it would be a daunting task. To win, the proposal must have 100 more YES votes than NO votes and two/thirds of the votes must be YES. We could announce the proposal in *all* the boating groups. -- Skipper Skipper and Skipper, I have searched Google looking for the original rec.boats charter without success. To your knowledge, is there one? I think a review of the charter, if it exists, should be a prerequisite to voting for or against changing it to a moderated newsgroup. The only document I found related to the early formation of rec.boats was this FAQ: http://www.gulf-stream.net/recboats/recboatsFAQ.html RCE |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RCE" wrote in message ... "Skipper" wrote in message ... Perhaps the time has come to convert rec.boats to a moderated NG and restore its previous image. Yes, I know it would be a daunting task. To win, the proposal must have 100 more YES votes than NO votes and two/thirds of the votes must be YES. We could announce the proposal in *all* the boating groups. -- Skipper Skipper and Skipper, I have searched Google looking for the original rec.boats charter without success. To your knowledge, is there one? I think a review of the charter, if it exists, should be a prerequisite to voting for or against changing it to a moderated newsgroup. The only document I found related to the early formation of rec.boats was this FAQ: http://www.gulf-stream.net/recboats/recboatsFAQ.html RCE This proposal is from Skipper............a nice guy who re-entered this NG a little over a month ago, with his first posts (over a 2 to 3 week period) flaming and telling lies about Chuck Gould and other respected members here. His recent posts have been nothing but trolls.........attempts to start arguments. Ignore him......he not worth any further effort on your part. ;-) |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RCE wrote:
I have searched Google looking for the original rec.boats charter without success. To your knowledge, is there one? I posted *all* existing rec.boats hierarchy charters a couple days ago. Advice if you want me to repost. I think a review of the charter, if it exists, should be a prerequisite to voting for or against changing it to a moderated newsgroup. There is a lot of info in usenet regarding changing a nonmoderated NG to a moderated one. It really varies little from forming a new NG. Advise if you want one of these cites reposted here. The only document I found related to the early formation of rec.boats was this FAQ: http://www.gulf-stream.net/recboats/recboatsFAQ.html And he spoke to the originator of rec.boats (John Hughes?) when he developed that site. -- Skipper |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skipper" wrote in message ... RCE wrote: I have searched Google looking for the original rec.boats charter without success. To your knowledge, is there one? I posted *all* existing rec.boats hierarchy charters a couple days ago. Advice if you want me to repost. A link would be appreciated. RCE |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message . .. RCE wrote: "Skipper" wrote in message ... RCE wrote: I have searched Google looking for the original rec.boats charter without success. To your knowledge, is there one? I posted *all* existing rec.boats hierarchy charters a couple days ago. Advice if you want me to repost. A link would be appreciated. RCE I read that charter years ago. There was nothing of interest in it. What charter? I don't think rec.boats actually *has* a charter. Here's a reference to this subject by Peter Meek (remember the rec.boats ball caps?) http://tinyurl.com/dfguh RCE |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RCE wrote:
I have searched Google looking for the original rec.boats charter without success. To your knowledge, is there one? I posted *all* existing rec.boats hierarchy charters a couple days ago. Advice if you want me to repost. A link would be appreciated. ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.an...newgroups/rec/ -- Skipper |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
There was some old copy that circulated through the newsgroup as robot postings every few months. It was pretty much useless verbiage. That was *not* the charter. Why Snipper is so interested in a "charter" and a moderated newsgroup is beyond reason. Is he hoping to get rid of those he doesn't like here and attract naive newbies who might actually believe the b.s. he spews here? Doubt seriously I would be voted one of the mods. However, I would like to see this NG return to its former form. It would take some time, but suspect the best would return. I also believe you'd be one of the better contributors in a moderated rec.boats...but *on-topic* and issuing minimal insults. Honestly, Krause, wouldn't you prefer to take the high road and see the forum restored to the usefulness it enjoyed in the past? -- Skipper |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Why Snipper is so interested in a "charter" and a moderated newsgroup is beyond reason. Is he hoping to get rid of those he doesn't like here and attract naive newbies who might actually believe the b.s. he spews here? That's my point to Skipper. I wanted to give him a chance to produce a rec.boats "charter". There isn't one. It is my understanding that in Usenet it is customary to vote on a change to the group's charter to accomplish things like going from unmoderated to moderated. Rec.boats has no official charter (that I know of) to vote for a change of. RCE |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skipper" wrote in message ... RCE wrote: I have searched Google looking for the original rec.boats charter without success. To your knowledge, is there one? I posted *all* existing rec.boats hierarchy charters a couple days ago. Advice if you want me to repost. A link would be appreciated. ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.an...newgroups/rec/ -- Skipper Nope. No rec.boats "charter" there. Got another? RCE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to get experience so that I can escape? | Cruising | |||
Carribean Sail | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General |