"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:56:07 -0800, jps wrote:

In article . net,
says...

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:10:21 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:32:53 -0500, "RCE" wrote:


Congrats, Tom.

it ain't over until its over.

although the good father had a couple of choice words on the
telephone.

hell have to see his confessor tomorrow. :)

and hes gonna owe me dinner. :)

Refs and the league got the outcome they wanted. Two insane calls to
take touchdowns away from Seattle.

The first in the end zone was a ticky tacky call, after the defensive
man had committed interference that wasn't called. The second play
for
the reception on the 1 yard line by Jeremy Stevens called back on a
hold, for which there was no evidence on the replay.

I won't even dispute the called touchdown for the Steelers 'cause it
looked like the ball could have crossed the plane before quarterback
was
tackled. The ref who made the call first indicated the ball was down
short and then changed his mind. Pretty dicey.

Tainted win for Steelers. Seattle gets purposely shafted by the refs.
Evidently there's just not enough money in a Seattle win.

come on - take it like a man you loser. :)

Wattayouexpect. Northwet pansy.

**** you, Bill.

Read the truth, if you can handle it:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/columns/story?
columnist=smith_michael&id=2320683

and here is the truth - right from micheal "word" smith - read it and
weep you loser.

boo f'in hoo...

------------------------------------
Seattle had its share of goats: in particular, tight end Jerramy
Stevens, who dropped four balls, and kicker Josh Brown, who missed two
field-goal attempts. Almost to a man, the Seahawks pointed the blame
finger at themselves for converting only one of three red zone
attempts (when they had been the best in the league in that area,
scoring a touchdown on 71.7 percent of their trips inside the 20-yard
line); for allowing Ben Roethlisberger to improvise and complete a
37-yard pass to game MVP Hines Ward to the 1; for giving up a 75-yard
touchdown run to Willie Parker; and for getting beaten by a trick play
on Antwaan Randle El's pass to fellow receiver Ward for a touchdown, a
first in Super Bowl history. If you read between the lines, though,
they pretty much spelled out in bold letters that they had plenty of
help in handing Pittsburgh its fifth Lombardi Trophy.
------------------------------------

loser. :)

What he said.

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:21:44 -0500, "P. Fritz"
wrote:


" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:54:06 -0800, chuckgould.chuck wrote:


Michael Wilbon, Washington Post, wrote:

Ben Roethlisberger's third-down dive into the end zone simply was
not
a
touchdown. Because less than two minutes remained, the call was
reviewed
in the booth. And everybody in the stadium plus everybody at home
culd
see, clear and conclusively, that Big Ben didn't get the ball across
the
goal line. It wasn't a touchdown, plain and simple. Yet the call
stood
and
the Steelers had a touchdown.

Uh, someone should tell this guy, it isn't getting "the ball across
the
goal line". It's breaking "the plane" of the goal line. The
difference
is close to two feet (the width of the painted line, plus the length
of
the ball). FWIW, it looked like a touchdown to me.

Seeing that you focused on this one play, I guess you think all the
other
lousy officiating was OK?

Let me guess...........you are a Steelers part time fan (whenever they
make
it to the Superbowl, and when not you jump on the bandwagon of
whatever
team
won).........right? ;-)

I could really care less who won and I did see plenty of bad
officiating,
mainly hurting the SeaHawks.

Pittsburgh did not play anywhere close to championship caliber. I
don't
think even a true Steelers fan could be proud of that win.


I think it was a touchdown, the ball clearly crossed the plane. But I
don't think the pass interference call should have been made, nor the
"illegal block"......I still wonder how one make an illegal block when
they
are on defense and trying to make a tackle. Didn't see the hold, but that
doesn't mean it didn't happen. I still am in amazement about the
Seahawks
two minute drills.

just to add fuel to the fire, Rothlesberger admitted that he didnt
make it over the goal line. :)

If he indeed said that he is really an ahole.

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:42:40 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:


just to add fuel to the fire, Rothlesberger admitted that he didnt
make it over the goal line. :)

If he indeed said that he is really an ahole.

More than likely, just a lame attempt at a troll. Nothing anywhere
else about it.

bb

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:03:50 GMT, bb wrote:

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:42:40 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:


just to add fuel to the fire, Rothlesberger admitted that he didnt
make it over the goal line. :)

If he indeed said that he is really an ahole.

More than likely, just a lame attempt at a troll. Nothing anywhere
else about it.

try letterman - its been on the radio and espn all morning.

and troll this dumbass...


Got a link?

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:21:44 -0500, "P. Fritz"
wrote:


" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:54:06 -0800, chuckgould.chuck wrote:


Michael Wilbon, Washington Post, wrote:

Ben Roethlisberger's third-down dive into the end zone simply was
not
a
touchdown. Because less than two minutes remained, the call was
reviewed
in the booth. And everybody in the stadium plus everybody at home
culd
see, clear and conclusively, that Big Ben didn't get the ball across
the
goal line. It wasn't a touchdown, plain and simple. Yet the call
stood
and
the Steelers had a touchdown.

Uh, someone should tell this guy, it isn't getting "the ball across
the
goal line". It's breaking "the plane" of the goal line. The
difference
is close to two feet (the width of the painted line, plus the length
of
the ball). FWIW, it looked like a touchdown to me.

Seeing that you focused on this one play, I guess you think all the
other
lousy officiating was OK?

Let me guess...........you are a Steelers part time fan (whenever they
make
it to the Superbowl, and when not you jump on the bandwagon of
whatever
team
won).........right? ;-)

I could really care less who won and I did see plenty of bad
officiating,
mainly hurting the SeaHawks.

Pittsburgh did not play anywhere close to championship caliber. I
don't
think even a true Steelers fan could be proud of that win.


I think it was a touchdown, the ball clearly crossed the plane. But I
don't think the pass interference call should have been made, nor the
"illegal block"......I still wonder how one make an illegal block when
they
are on defense and trying to make a tackle. Didn't see the hold, but that
doesn't mean it didn't happen. I still am in amazement about the
Seahawks
two minute drills.

just to add fuel to the fire, Rothlesberger admitted that he didnt
make it over the goal line. :)

That is just cruel :-)

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:17:14 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:


try letterman - its been on the radio and espn all morning.

and troll this dumbass...


Got a link?

No, but he will call you a dumbass............

bb

On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:12:57 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

try letterman - its been on the radio and espn all morning.

Just did a search on espn.com, nothing, hmmmm.

and troll this dumbass...

troll that? hehh, better sprinkle a little grow powder on that thing.

bb

he didn't say he didn't get in your moron. Just after the play, he
told cowher he didn't "think" he got in. Everyone sitting at home
watching on TV had 100x the view that Roethlisberger did. Trolling
morons. Stop trying to blame everyone else for Seattle's ineptitude.

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:17:14 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:03:50 GMT, bb wrote:

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:42:40 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:


just to add fuel to the fire, Rothlesberger admitted that he didnt
make it over the goal line. :)

If he indeed said that he is really an ahole.

More than likely, just a lame attempt at a troll. Nothing anywhere
else about it.

try letterman - its been on the radio and espn all morning.

and troll this dumbass...


Got a link?

http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/exclusives/wahoo/

And what about that touchdown which Ben ran for? Was it really a
touchdown? Ben says he didn't think he got in but wasn't going to
argue with the referee when he called it a touchdown. Ben says the
Steelers were ready to go for the TD on 4th down if they had to, with
Ben suggesting he was to run it again.

Thanks.

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:17:14 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..

On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:03:50 GMT, bb wrote:


On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:42:40 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:



just to add fuel to the fire, Rothlesberger admitted that he didnt
make it over the goal line. :)

If he indeed said that he is really an ahole.

More than likely, just a lame attempt at a troll. Nothing anywhere
else about it.

try letterman - its been on the radio and espn all morning.

and troll this dumbass...


Got a link?


http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/exclusives/wahoo/

And what about that touchdown which Ben ran for? Was it really a
touchdown? Ben says he didn't think he got in but wasn't going to
argue with the referee when he called it a touchdown. Ben says the
Steelers were ready to go for the TD on 4th down if they had to, with
Ben suggesting he was to run it again.


From a foot out?
Isn't that where they use the 'quarterback sneak'?