Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:09:48 GMT, Fred Dehl wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in : Don White wrote: Finally, the tv was delivered yesterday and the cable guy showed up at 1500 today to do his thing. Here we only have 9 real HDTV stations in the high channel range 602 - 610. Tv is beautiful on those and a bit less so on the remaining channels. One tricky thing is choosing the correct 'screen mode'. I set it up so the HDTV fills the screen, but the normal channels have the black bars on each side. They just don't look right if I go to full screen or zoom or wide zoom. I have to get the Sony salesman out to the house to make sure I have the set programmed for maxium clarity. My SONY HDTV has the same sized screen display on regular or HDTV cablecasts, so I am guessing you have a setting set wrong. Nope, as usual, YOU are wrong. HD broadcasts have an aspect ratio of 16:9. Regular broadcasts are in 4:3 AR. If your regular programming fills the screen of an HD display, either everyone looks fat or you're cutting off significant parts of the top and bottom of the picture. That's correct, at least on my TV with Cox, except when an HD program is being broadcast on an HD channel. Then the 'normal' zoom fills the 16:9 screen. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:40:15 GMT, Don White wrote: Finally, the tv was delivered yesterday and the cable guy showed up at 1500 today to do his thing. Here we only have 9 real HDTV stations in the high channel range 602 - 610. Tv is beautiful on those and a bit less so on the remaining channels. One tricky thing is choosing the correct 'screen mode'. I set it up so the HDTV fills the screen, but the normal channels have the black bars on each side. They just don't look right if I go to full screen or zoom or wide zoom. I have to get the Sony salesman out to the house to make sure I have the set programmed for maxium clarity. The cable guy gave me a HDMI cable to run between the box and tv and an optical audio cable for DVR cable box/home theater system. Now when I get my new DVD player I may use component cables for that. The TV only has one HDMI input and it would be too much trouble moving the HDMI cable between the DVR box and the DVD player as the salesman suggested. When a signal is broadcast in HD, the normal setting will fill the screen nicely. When looking at regular broadcast, you'll have to live with the lines on the sides, a 'stretched' mode, or a zoomed mode. (At least that's the way mine is.) This is true for all channels, except the HD channels when the broadcast is in HD. I first thought there was something wrong with my TV also, but there wasn't. I've learned to live with fat faces, or having the heads cut off a little and the display reduced on the bottom. I use the component cables for the cable box and for the dvd player. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Caught the program 'R Steves Europe travels' on PBS HD http://www.ricksteves.com/tvr/parisrse306_descr.htm Scenery was breathtaking...really felt like you were there. That's what I was hoping for in my new TV |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
Since neither of you rectal fissures has any idea of the capabilities or settings of my television, I suggest you spend your time diddling each other. And while we're on the subject of diddling, what price do you think the west will ultimately pay for supporting Israel's landgrabs and abuse of Arabs? Not a small hurt, eh? I'll write to Hamas and suggest it set up a Derby, Kansas, chapter. You can be the Grand Pubah. Yes, go ahead and write Hamas, Krause. Make sure you address the envelope properly. Believe they prefer street address to P.O. Box numbers. And, oh yes, a few facts for you, Krause: 1916 - Sykes-Picot Agreement establishes Labanon, Syria, & Palestine from old Ottoman Empire (French-British mandate). 1923 - Jewish terrorists force Britian into unilaterally splitting Palestine into Palestine & Trans-Jordan. 1947 - Jewish terrorists force UN into further partitioning of Palestine into Arab and Jew sections. 1948 - Hagana (IDF) unilaterally establishes state of Israel. US Jews lobby government (Democrats) to support this takeover. US is first to recognize new "state" of Israel. Now, your position has been that there are no "real Palestinians, only Arabs." You are factually incorrect. Your belief that there are no Palestinians is, at best, wishful thinking on your part. There have, in fact, been massive landgrabs and human rights abuses in Palestine. No way the west can win in the end. Is it really worth the endless deaths? Time to cut US losses. -- Skipper |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skipper wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: Since neither of you rectal fissures has any idea of the capabilities or settings of my television, I suggest you spend your time diddling each other. And while we're on the subject of diddling, what price do you think the west will ultimately pay for supporting Israel's landgrabs and abuse of Arabs? Not a small hurt, eh? I'll write to Hamas and suggest it set up a Derby, Kansas, chapter. You can be the Grand Pubah. Yes, go ahead and write Hamas, Krause. Make sure you address the envelope properly. Believe they prefer street address to P.O. Box numbers. And, oh yes, a few facts for you, Krause: 1916 - Sykes-Picot Agreement establishes Labanon, Syria, & Palestine from old Ottoman Empire (French-British mandate). 1923 - Jewish terrorists force Britian into unilaterally splitting Palestine into Palestine & Trans-Jordan. 1947 - Jewish terrorists force UN into further partitioning of Palestine into Arab and Jew sections. 1948 - Hagana (IDF) unilaterally establishes state of Israel. US Jews lobby government (Democrats) to support this takeover. US is first to recognize new "state" of Israel. Now, your position has been that there are no "real Palestinians, only Arabs." You are factually incorrect. Your belief that there are no Palestinians is, at best, wishful thinking on your part. There have, in fact, been massive landgrabs and human rights abuses in Palestine. No way the west can win in the end. Is it really worth the endless deaths? Time to cut US losses. -- Skipper Skipper, I thought you wanted to stay away from political arguments and fights, and keep this a boating NG? -- Reggie ************************************************** ************* That's my story and I am sticking to it. ************************************************** ************* |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:52:26 -0600, Skipper wrote:
Now, your position has been that there are no "real Palestinians, only Arabs." You are factually incorrect. Your belief that there are no Palestinians is, at best, wishful thinking on your part. There have, in fact, been massive landgrabs and human rights abuses in Palestine. No way the west can win in the end. Is it really worth the endless deaths? Time to cut US losses. Wrong group, take it offline. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reggie Smithers wrote:
1916 - Sykes-Picot Agreement establishes Labanon, Syria, & Palestine from old Ottoman Empire (French-British mandate). 1923 - Jewish terrorists force Britian into unilaterally splitting Palestine into Palestine & Trans-Jordan. 1947 - Jewish terrorists force UN into further partitioning of Palestine into Arab and Jew sections. 1948 - Hagana (IDF) unilaterally establishes state of Israel. US Jews lobby government (Democrats) to support this takeover. US is first to recognize new "state" of Israel. Now, your position has been that there are no "real Palestinians, only Arabs." You are factually incorrect. Your belief that there are no Palestinians is, at best, wishful thinking on your part. There have, in fact, been massive landgrabs and human rights abuses in Palestine. No way the west can win in the end. Is it really worth the endless deaths? Time to cut US losses. Skipper, I thought you wanted to stay away from political arguments Nothing argumentative, just facts: The Sykes-Picot Agreement - 1916: It is accordingly understood between the french and British governments: That France and great Britain are prepared to recognize and protect an independent ***Arab*** states or a confederation of ***Arab*** states (a) and (b) marked on the annexed map, ***under the suzerainty of an Arab chief***. That in area (a) France, and in area (b) great Britain, shall have priority of right of enterprise and local loans. That in area (a) France, and in area (b) great Britain, shall alone supply advisers or foreign functionaries at the request of the ***Arab*** state or confederation of Arab states. -- And for those of us who saw the movie Lawrence of Arabia, let's not forget how the west screwed the Arabs by implementing a mandate system in ***their*** lands. Is it any wonder the Arabs are upset? -- Skipper |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Fred Dehl wrote: Harry Krause wrote in : Fred Dehl wrote: Harry Krause wrote in : Don White wrote: Finally, the tv was delivered yesterday and the cable guy showed up at 1500 today to do his thing. Here we only have 9 real HDTV stations in the high channel range 602 - 610. Tv is beautiful on those and a bit less so on the remaining channels. One tricky thing is choosing the correct 'screen mode'. I set it up so the HDTV fills the screen, but the normal channels have the black bars on each side. They just don't look right if I go to full screen or zoom or wide zoom. I have to get the Sony salesman out to the house to make sure I have the set programmed for maxium clarity. My SONY HDTV has the same sized screen display on regular or HDTV cablecasts, so I am guessing you have a setting set wrong. Nope, as usual, YOU are wrong. HD broadcasts have an aspect ratio of 16:9. Regular broadcasts are in 4:3 AR. If your regular programming fills the screen of an HD display, either everyone looks fat or you're cutting off significant parts of the top and bottom of the picture. Fred: There's nothing, I repeat, nothing you post here that I believe or care about. Good. And you're wrong. You don't even know what a ****ing aspect ratio IS, dickwash. But I'm not going to expend any effort to "prove" it. Because you CAN'T, pussy. The above inflammatory blather does absolutely nothing for your credibility. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:17:35 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:09:48 GMT, Fred Dehl wrote: Harry Krause wrote in : Don White wrote: Finally, the tv was delivered yesterday and the cable guy showed up at 1500 today to do his thing. Here we only have 9 real HDTV stations in the high channel range 602 - 610. Tv is beautiful on those and a bit less so on the remaining channels. One tricky thing is choosing the correct 'screen mode'. I set it up so the HDTV fills the screen, but the normal channels have the black bars on each side. They just don't look right if I go to full screen or zoom or wide zoom. I have to get the Sony salesman out to the house to make sure I have the set programmed for maxium clarity. My SONY HDTV has the same sized screen display on regular or HDTV cablecasts, so I am guessing you have a setting set wrong. Nope, as usual, YOU are wrong. HD broadcasts have an aspect ratio of 16:9. Regular broadcasts are in 4:3 AR. If your regular programming fills the screen of an HD display, either everyone looks fat or you're cutting off significant parts of the top and bottom of the picture. That's correct, at least on my TV with Cox, except when an HD program is being broadcast on an HD channel. Then the 'normal' zoom fills the 16:9 screen. -- 'Til next time, John H I suggest you read that thick manual closely, and experiment with some of hte settings. If you'll read my response to Don, you'll see I've been there and done that. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- Skipper |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skipper wrote:
Reggie Smithers wrote: 1916 - Sykes-Picot Agreement establishes Labanon, Syria, & Palestine from old Ottoman Empire (French-British mandate). 1923 - Jewish terrorists force Britian into unilaterally splitting Palestine into Palestine & Trans-Jordan. 1947 - Jewish terrorists force UN into further partitioning of Palestine into Arab and Jew sections. 1948 - Hagana (IDF) unilaterally establishes state of Israel. US Jews lobby government (Democrats) to support this takeover. US is first to recognize new "state" of Israel. Now, your position has been that there are no "real Palestinians, only Arabs." You are factually incorrect. Your belief that there are no Palestinians is, at best, wishful thinking on your part. There have, in fact, been massive landgrabs and human rights abuses in Palestine. No way the west can win in the end. Is it really worth the endless deaths? Time to cut US losses. Skipper, I thought you wanted to stay away from political arguments Nothing argumentative, just facts: The Sykes-Picot Agreement - 1916: It is accordingly understood between the french and British governments: That France and great Britain are prepared to recognize and protect an independent ***Arab*** states or a confederation of ***Arab*** states (a) and (b) marked on the annexed map, ***under the suzerainty of an Arab chief***. That in area (a) France, and in area (b) great Britain, shall have priority of right of enterprise and local loans. That in area (a) France, and in area (b) great Britain, shall alone supply advisers or foreign functionaries at the request of the ***Arab*** state or confederation of Arab states. -- And for those of us who saw the movie Lawrence of Arabia, let's not forget how the west screwed the Arabs by implementing a mandate system in ***their*** lands. Is it any wonder the Arabs are upset? -- Skipper Skipper, It appears your motivation for posting is to troll for fights, this is not conducive to your stated desire for a boating NG, but also diminishes the value of any of your boating related posts for any new members to rec.boats. You are proving Harry correct, when he said you had no desire for a boating NG. -- Reggie ************************************************** ************* That's my story and I am sticking to it. ************************************************** ************* |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ping: Don White and RCE | General | |||
Yikes! Consumer Electronic Rip... | General |