Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.fishing,rec.outdoors.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Based on flawed population estimates, California has passed "emergency"
regulations reducing the sturgeon slot limit to 10 inches: 46" to 56": ======== The Associated Press Published 4:15 pm PST Thursday, March 2, 2006 RIVERSIDE, Calif. (AP) - California wildlife regulators on Thursday approved emergency restrictions on sturgeon fishing in an effort to bolster depleted populations of the giant fish. The state Fish and Game Commission voted unanimously to reduce the maximum size of white sturgeon that can be caught or possessed from 72 inches to 56 inches. The commissioners, meeting in Riverside, also voted to bar fishermen from taking less frequently fished green sturgeon. The new regulations are aimed at increasing the number of mature female sturgeon in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system and expand the state's sturgeon populations, according to the state Department of Fish and Game. The emergency regulations, which would be in place for 120 days, were expected to take effect within the next two weeks pending approval by the state Office of Administrative Law, said DFG spokesman Steve Martarano. After peaking at about 144,000 in 1998, the number of legal-sized white sturgeon has fallen to a 50-year low of about 10,000, according to the latest estimates. State biologists attribute the decline to poor spawning success, migratory obstacles, poaching and overfishing. ============= Likely to follow the 120 day "emergency" regs, a continued reduced slot will remain along with bag limits and "sturgeon tags". This will likely include additional "fees". Meanwhile, nothing was done about the real problems of poaching and reduced water flow. Those items were not even addressed. But by God, the DFG *did something*!! They know that the lawful fishermen is easily bullied as they refuse to enforce current regs on poachers. Just last year DFG stated flatly that the lawful fisherman was not at all the problem; poaching is the problem: http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/InNews...arket2004.html . Also, they would not consider the fact that their count is flawed in spite of the fact that fishermen are generally experiencing an "as usual" season. Next in the sights of environmental do-gooders: Salmon fishing! And no, my grandkids will likely never get to fish for such grand species. The do-gooders agenda is much the same as PETA: The best regulation is NO FISHING. And, unfortunately, regulation by regulation, closure upon closure, they are winning. Dale www.fishwisher.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lanier fishing report for Jan. | General | |||
New England ice fishing | General | |||
New commercial fishing regulations considered........ | General |