Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any experience with this camera for boating purposes?
I'm especially curious about the quality of whitewater action pictures in typical boating (i.e. less than optimal) lighting conditions. I was hoping to find some relevant info at Bill Tuthill's old comparison site (http://creekin.net/cameras.htm ), but I found that the domain was taken over by some company. The only review that I could find that gave more than just the basics was this: http://www.digicamreview.co.uk/olymp...lus_review.htm Still, I prefer to hear first hand from someone who has used one for paddling before paying so much money... -- Wilko van den Bergh wilkoa t)dse(d o tnl Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe ---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the limitations.--- http://kayaker.nl/ |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilko wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with this camera for boating purposes? I'm especially curious about the quality of whitewater action pictures in typical boating (i.e. less than optimal) lighting conditions. Sorry no, several of my friends own the Pentax Optio WPi and are generally happy with it, although they all say it's not one of the best digicams, although it is waterproof. Other friends have a regular digicam inside a waterproof case. This might produce better results, especially when you remove camera from case and use it in landlubber mode. But cases are costly. I was hoping to find some relevant info at Bill Tuthill's old comparison site (http://creekin.net/cameras.htm ), but I found that the domain was taken over by some company. Yes, I sold that domain name and moved content to cacreeks.com so try http://cacreeks.com/cameras.htm instead. The Pentax WPi and Olympus 730 SW look similar except the Olympus has more megapixels. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill Tuthill wrote: Wilko wrote: Does anyone have any experience with this camera for boating purposes? I'm especially curious about the quality of whitewater action pictures in typical boating (i.e. less than optimal) lighting conditions. Sorry no, several of my friends own the Pentax Optio WPi and are generally happy with it, although they all say it's not one of the best digicams, although it is waterproof. Yeah, I also know a few boaters who have one or who have the predecessor (the Optio WP), and at first I thought about getting one, but then I heard their negative experiences. So that one's off of my list of possibilities. Other friends have a regular digicam inside a waterproof case. This might produce better results, especially when you remove camera from case and use it in landlubber mode. But cases are costly. Yeah, that's not what I had in mind. The Olympus with two 1GB cards and an extra battery pack costs about 500 Euro here. I already think that's a lot of money, and I definately don't want to spend more. I was hoping to find some relevant info at Bill Tuthill's old comparison site (http://creekin.net/cameras.htm ), but I found that the domain was taken over by some company. Yes, I sold that domain name and moved content to cacreeks.com so try http://cacreeks.com/cameras.htm instead. Thanks Bill, I'll change the links! The Pentax WPi and Olympus 730 SW look similar except the Olympus has more megapixels. That's what I thought at first, but now I'm not so sure any more. Besides the depth and impact resistance, I also like the lens-protection on the Olympus, and it looks like it doesn't eat batteries as badly as the Pentax. I just got an email from a lady on BT who has bought one. She will send me some pictures and tell me more. I'm curious to hear about her experiences and see those pictures. -- Wilko van den Bergh wilkoa t)dse(d o tnl Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe ---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the limitations.--- http://kayaker.nl/ |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilko wrote:
I just got an email from a lady on BT who has bought one. She will send me some pictures and tell me more. I'm curious to hear about her experiences and see those pictures. Please let us know what you think. It would be nice to have a "cult" waterproof digicam, like the Pentax WR series used to be for 35mm film. The previous Olympus Stylus 310 and 410 were not highly regarded. Most digicams are too slow at default ISO setting, or too noisy at higher ISO settings. The Fuji F10/F11/F30 and E900 are exceptions, but are not waterproof. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Tuthill wrote:
Wilko wrote: I just got an email from a lady on BT who has bought one. She will send me some pictures and tell me more. I'm curious to hear about her experiences and see those pictures. Please let us know what you think. I think that most of the pictures looked rather well, but some looked a bit grainy. She had two hitewater pictures, but with the amount of light present, I could probably have taken the same quality picture also with my WR 105. Also, I found some of them pretty dark. I'm not quite convinced yet that this is the camera I have been waiting for to make the switch to digital. But maybe I'm just too critical or too old fashioned... :-) It would be nice to have a "cult" waterproof digicam, like the Pentax WR series used to be for 35mm film. The previous Olympus Stylus 310 and 410 were not highly regarded. Yeah, tell me about it. :-) I have two Pentax WR105 camera's that I like a lot. I almost feel sorry to stop using them, since they both still function just fine, despite serious abuse on my account! Most digicams are too slow at default ISO setting, or too noisy at higher ISO settings. The Fuji F10/F11/F30 and E900 are exceptions, but are not waterproof. Yep, I'm rather hesitant to go digital, in part because of that. On the other hand, being able to erase bad shots and take as many as you like without worrying about the extra cost associated with using more film also has its merit. I'm also not quite convinced that the digital pictures last long enough, with CD's and DVD's losing their data after a couple of years. Maybe it's time to invest in a RAID 5 array to store digital pictures? :-) -- Wilko van den Bergh wilkoa t)dse(d o tnl Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe ---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the limitations.--- http://kayaker.nl/ |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilko" wrote in message ... couple of years. Maybe it's time to invest in a RAID 5 array to store digital pictures? :-) Now there's an idea! :-D Rebecca |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just got the Pentax Optio W10 - the newest of the Optio cameras. It
has 6 mg pixels and no viewfinder. All of the newest digitals are being made without viewfinders. I had all of the old film Pentax WR cameras and loved them. I also have a Pentax Optio 550 that is not waterproof that takes great shots. I put it in a bag and took pictures on the San Juan River last year, but that is not a really good option for anything above Class II. The Pentax I just bought came out a couple of months ago. I'll try to get some whitewater pictures and get them loaded to my smugmug site. I just have a few surfing right now. I may try to get them loaded tonight. I'll post here if I do. I chose the Pentax over the Olympus because the motion stabilizer reviews are better than the Olympus. I take a lot of shots from the kayak, so that's a big consideration for me. Also, Pentax seems to try to get a niche with the whitewater cameras. However, it still doesn't have a lenses cover. That would have been nice. It also has a "green" mode to save the battery. Haven't used it enough to see if I really like that feature, but it sounds good. Good luck, and let us know what you decide. Renee |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Waterproof Camera | UK Paddle | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
The Trolling Stops HERE | ASA | |||
Who would be upset at a cartoon of Thor? | ASA | |||
bertie the bunyip versus bob wald | ASA |