"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 May 2006 20:38:35 +0000, NOYB wrote:


And what do you call it when Chavez changes the rules to make himself
President for the next 25 years?

I'd call it BS.

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/articles.php?artno=1723


"A referendum would be about whether Chavez would be permitted to run every
six years and --in the event that he were to continue winning elections--
serve multiple presidential terms "


I propose the same for Bush!






http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news.php?newsno=1901

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Chavez is a devout believer in
democracy. There was his failed 1992 coup attempt. But I sure do like
the way he has managed to get under our President's skin.

bin Laden got under our Presidents' skin. So did Ho Chi Minh, Hitler,
Hirohito, Hussein, and others. Did you like the way they managed to get
under our Presidents' skin?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 20:38:35 +0000, NOYB wrote:


And what do you call it when Chavez changes the rules to make himself
President for the next 25 years?

I'd call it BS.

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/articles.php?artno=1723

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news.php?newsno=1901

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Chavez is a devout believer in
democracy. There was his failed 1992 coup attempt. But I sure do like
the way he has managed to get under our President's skin.


When the Republicans retain the House and Senate this Fall, they should
move to abolish the 22nd Amendment...so we can have an "active
democracy"
like Venezuela.

They're not working on that now?



Chavez is one of the most interesting pols on the world scene. I got a
kick out of the way the Bushshippers "retaliated" against him yesterday by
banning arm sales to Venezuela. Chavez, after all, doesn't support the
Bushshippers' fraudulent anti-terrorism program.

Has anyone in the Bushshipper Administration noticed that South America is
slipping away from the US sphere of influence?


South American neo-Marxists like Chavez are buying the hearts and souls of
the poor and destitute with bribes in the form of "social services"...just
like the Democrats do in this country.

The problem is that the money for the social services (a.k.a. bribes) can
only come from the pockets of the successful capitalists that the
neo-Marxists work so diligently to distance themselves from. It can't go on
forever. The first thing that happens is decreased western expenditures in
the country...followed shortly after by an embargo. The next thing you
know, a once-vibrant Venezuela becomes the new Cuba.

They're 15 minutes is almost up.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Has anyone in the Bushshipper Administration noticed that South America is
slipping away from the US sphere of influence?


I would say they have...as evidenced by the selection of John Negroponte to
serve as US Director of National Intelligence.

He has plenty of experience in destabilizing non-US-friendly governments in
South America...which might be needed once again with Daniel Ortega's
Sandinistas making a comeback. ;-)

On Tue, 16 May 2006 20:11:27 +0000, NOYB wrote:


The problem is that the money for the social services (a.k.a. bribes) can
only come from the pockets of the successful capitalists that the
neo-Marxists work so diligently to distance themselves from. It can't go
on forever. The first thing that happens is decreased western
expenditures in the country...followed shortly after by an embargo. The
next thing you know, a once-vibrant Venezuela becomes the new Cuba.

LOL, Venezuela is the fifth largest exporter of crude oil. It supplies us
with 13% of our oil. Yup, I could see this President embargoing them.




They're 15 minutes is almost up.

On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:57:34 +0000, NOYB wrote:


I propose the same for Bush!

There is a difference. Chavez is popular in his country.

bin Laden got under our Presidents' skin. So did Ho Chi Minh, Hitler,
Hirohito, Hussein, and others. Did you like the way they managed to get
under our Presidents' skin?

Speaking of bin Laden, where is he these days? Another Bush failure.

"basskisser" wrote in message

Hmm, I guess it went right over your head, eh? SHOOOM!!!

??????



........if you take the contraction out of "What part of republic
don't you understand", it reads Which part of republic do not you
understand, when in fact it should read What part of republic do you
not understand.

.....and ?

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:57:34 +0000, NOYB wrote:


I propose the same for Bush!

There is a difference. Chavez is popular in his country.

Bush has a 74% approval rating among Republicans. He's pretty damn popular
too!

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

Hmm, I guess it went right over your head, eh? SHOOOM!!!

??????



........if you take the contraction out of "What part of republic
don't you understand", it reads Which part of republic do not you
understand, when in fact it should read What part of republic do you
not understand.

....and ?



LMAO

From the person that thinks "what to hell" and "cow down" are proper, and
can't figure out the difference between "your" and you're"

On Wed, 17 May 2006 01:39:08 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

Bush has a 74% approval rating among Republicans. He's pretty damn popular
too!

Do you happen to have an approval rating for Bush on Diebold voting
machines?

bb

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:57:34 +0000, NOYB wrote:


I propose the same for Bush!
There is a difference. Chavez is popular in his country.

Bush has a 74% approval rating among Republicans. He's pretty damn
popular too!




Uh, about 32% of the voting population identifies itself as Republican.

Yeah, but Republicans actually vote...and they don't need to be bribed by
people handing out cigarettes.




When Clinton hit 37% approval in Gallup's poll, he had only a 63% approval
rating among his own party.

Bush's popularity among Republicans is phenomenal. The only reason it's not
in the mid-80's is because of his stance on immigration. But his speech the
other night should help that.