Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2006 15:09:19 -0700, "JimH" wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On 10 Jul 2006 14:40:39 -0700, "JimH" wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Harry Krause wrote: n and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on Enough already. You've beat it to death. Harry, Considering some of the conversations that get bet to death, I thought this was better than most. I am doing my best to keep it on topic without any personal attacks, and have ignored yours and JimH's barbs, because it looks like this is something that is relevant to everyone who boats. Why does it bother you to discuss the idea of using mechanics you can trust and when it makes sense to cut your loses and find a new mechanic? Because the topic of this thread is removing waterline scum. Got it? Isn't this a conversation that can be kicked around without the name calling? No one has called you names. What you were accused of is having no boat, no boating experience and harping on something that was a dead issue (with you) days ago. If you want to start a thread about mechanics be my guest. But this thread has absolutely nothing to do with that subject. Every regular here has at one time or another posted pictures of their boats, talked about their boats and their boating experiences. You have *never* done so. I cannot think of one other regular here who is in your company.....not one. You have even made it a point to keep even your first name a secret *Reginald*. You have chosen to be secretive about everything in your life. That is certainly your choice, but learn to live with the consequences by doing so. And please stop the whining and the "who, me?" routine........it is getting old. Gosh, JimH. You're assuming an awful lot there, don't you know. Would it be better if Reggie said he owned a 36'er and talked about all the 'trips' he'd taken? Would that make him more believable? From the advice he's given, just to you, I'd say he's had more experience with boats than either you or me. Why not discuss the advice itself, instead of throwing acrimonious insults around? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John You'd say? Hehehe. You and Reggie should get a room. Add Kevin to that list. Would that make it a ménage à trois? Why would you possibly say that? Hmmm? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2006 15:24:46 -0700, "JimH" wrote:
JohnH wrote: On 10 Jul 2006 14:40:39 -0700, "JimH" wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Harry Krause wrote: n and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on Enough already. You've beat it to death. Harry, Considering some of the conversations that get bet to death, I thought this was better than most. I am doing my best to keep it on topic without any personal attacks, and have ignored yours and JimH's barbs, because it looks like this is something that is relevant to everyone who boats. Why does it bother you to discuss the idea of using mechanics you can trust and when it makes sense to cut your loses and find a new mechanic? Because the topic of this thread is removing waterline scum. Got it? Isn't this a conversation that can be kicked around without the name calling? No one has called you names. What you were accused of is having no boat, no boating experience and harping on something that was a dead issue (with you) days ago. If you want to start a thread about mechanics be my guest. But this thread has absolutely nothing to do with that subject. Every regular here has at one time or another posted pictures of their boats, talked about their boats and their boating experiences. You have *never* done so. I cannot think of one other regular here who is in your company.....not one. You have even made it a point to keep even your first name a secret *Reginald*. You have chosen to be secretive about everything in your life. That is certainly your choice, but learn to live with the consequences by doing so. And please stop the whining and the "who, me?" routine........it is getting old. Gosh, JimH. You're assuming an awful lot there, don't you know. Would it be better if Reggie said he owned a 36'er and talked about all the 'trips' he'd taken? Would that make him more believable? That would move him/her a couple of steps up the credibility ladder. From the advice he's given, just to you, I'd say he's had more experience with boats than either you or me. ROTFLMAO!!!!!! Why not discuss the advice itself, instead of throwing acrimonious insults around? If telling someone that I would never consider any of his/her advice based on the fact that he/she has never posted any personal experiences about his/her boat and boating experiences then I guess I am guilty of "throwing acrimonious insults around". In my eyes, he/she has absolutely no credibility. Not to be acrimonious, but *you* should not discuss another's credibility. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Harry Krause wrote: n and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on Enough already. You've beat it to death. Harry, Considering some of the conversations that get bet to death, I thought this was better than most. I am doing my best to keep it on topic without any personal attacks, and have ignored yours and JimH's barbs, because it looks like this is something that is relevant to everyone who boats. Why does it bother you to discuss the idea of using mechanics you can trust and when it makes sense to cut your loses and find a new mechanic? Because the topic of this thread is removing waterline scum. Got it? Isn't this a conversation that can be kicked around without the name calling? No one has called you names. What you were accused of is having no boat, no boating experience and harping on something that was a dead issue (with you) days ago. If you want to start a thread about mechanics be my guest. But this thread has absolutely nothing to do with that subject. Every regular here has at one time or another posted pictures of their boats, talked about their boats and their boating experiences. You have *never* done so. I cannot think of one other regular here who is in your company.....not one. You have even made it a point to keep even your first name a secret *Reginald*. You have chosen to be secretive about everything in your life. That is certainly your choice, but learn to live with the consequences by doing so. And please stop the whining and the "who, me?" routine........it is getting old. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! JimH, It looks like the beating the dead horse might have saved you another expensive break down. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote: On 10 Jul 2006 14:40:39 -0700, "JimH" wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Harry Krause wrote: n and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on Enough already. You've beat it to death. Harry, Considering some of the conversations that get bet to death, I thought this was better than most. I am doing my best to keep it on topic without any personal attacks, and have ignored yours and JimH's barbs, because it looks like this is something that is relevant to everyone who boats. Why does it bother you to discuss the idea of using mechanics you can trust and when it makes sense to cut your loses and find a new mechanic? Because the topic of this thread is removing waterline scum. Got it? Isn't this a conversation that can be kicked around without the name calling? No one has called you names. What you were accused of is having no boat, no boating experience and harping on something that was a dead issue (with you) days ago. If you want to start a thread about mechanics be my guest. But this thread has absolutely nothing to do with that subject. Every regular here has at one time or another posted pictures of their boats, talked about their boats and their boating experiences. You have *never* done so. I cannot think of one other regular here who is in your company.....not one. You have even made it a point to keep even your first name a secret *Reginald*. You have chosen to be secretive about everything in your life. That is certainly your choice, but learn to live with the consequences by doing so. And please stop the whining and the "who, me?" routine........it is getting old. Gosh, JimH. You're assuming an awful lot there, don't you know. Would it be better if Reggie said he owned a 36'er and talked about all the 'trips' he'd taken? Would that make him more believable? That would move him/her a couple of steps up the credibility ladder. From the advice he's given, just to you, I'd say he's had more experience with boats than either you or me. ROTFLMAO!!!!!! Why not discuss the advice itself, instead of throwing acrimonious insults around? If telling someone that I would never consider any of his/her advice based on the fact that he/she has never posted any personal experiences about his/her boat and boating experiences then I guess I am guilty of "throwing acrimonious insults around". In my eyes, he/she has absolutely no credibility. JimH, Now that hurts, I have really tried to be helpful with the info about your 160 degree therm, and discussing the extreme water fluctuations you were showing. Let's just assume I really don't know anything, but I have been polite, and I am batting 1000. If for no other reason that that, you might want to consider changing your tack. To be honest, I have been carry on this discussion because it seemed to be a great thread about boats that was relevant to lots of boaters (ie impellers, mechanics etc). You on the other hand seemed hell bent on changing the thread into a personal battle. I really would think you would be tickled to death that I mentioned that I thought the temperature fluctuations you were showing were extreme, but what the heck. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Let's just assume I really don't know anything Works for me. See and that is where you can point out what I said is incorrect. You and JimH are best buds all of a sudden, but when he listed his temp flux, you didn't say a word. When I saw that, my first reaction is wow, it looks like the engine overheating might have caused some more damage, but at the very least, this needs to be looked into. You said nothing. Richard who is not JimH's buddy at least confirmed that this needs to be looked at. That is not what a buddy does, a buddy should be more than just someone to join in on rec.boats personal insults. Let's try to stay focused on discussing issues and not personal insults. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... That is not what a buddy does, a buddy should be more than just someone to join in on rec.boats personal insults. Let's try to stay focused on discussing issues and not personal insults. -- Since when has wrecked.boats not been insulting? (Wondering where Skipper is .... should be back from his "cruise" by now). Eisboch I guess it will never change. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... That is not what a buddy does, a buddy should be more than just someone to join in on rec.boats personal insults. Let's try to stay focused on discussing issues and not personal insults. -- Since when has wrecked.boats not been insulting? (Wondering where Skipper is .... should be back from his "cruise" by now). Eisboch |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... I guess it will never change. Because it's easy and safe. Before Usenet you got into an argument in a bar, called someone an asshole and he would proceed to rearrange your face. Here, you get "plonked" Eisboch |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... That is not what a buddy does, a buddy should be more than just someone to join in on rec.boats personal insults. Let's try to stay focused on discussing issues and not personal insults. -- Since when has wrecked.boats not been insulting? (Wondering where Skipper is .... should be back from his "cruise" by now). Eisboch I guess it will never change. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! Try being more open about your boat and boating experiences and maybe, just maybe folks will consider your advice. Until then accept the consequences of your decision to remain totally anonymous to this NG, both in name and experience, none of which have resulting in insulting or name calling. BTW: You previously stated that *all* Volvo Penta engines need a 160F and you were promptly proved wrong. Your credibility remains at 0% Just the facts...........Jack! JimH, I was wrong on that matter, but on the 4.3 and the 5.7, a very large segment and the engine we were talking about, I was correct. Since everyone knows so much about your personal life, including your name, address and phone number, and all of your personal problems your credibility must be at an all time high. But that is not important. The important thing is we are discussing a boating issue that effects the majority of boaters who read rec.boats. As I said, I really was not directing my comments towards you, but someone who might want to learn from your mistakes. This year you have provided many newbies an excellent opportunity to learn a lot, more than anyone else in rec.boats. Some of the lessons you have provided a 1. Don't rely on using the water temp. to determine if it is safe to use the impeller for another year. You should never go more than 2 years w/o changing the impeller. If you buy a new boat, change the impeller immediately. 2. Don't use mechanics who think this is an acceptable procedure to check the impeller. 3. Don't use mechanics who use the parts they have in stock instead of ordering the parts that are spec'd. 4. When your water temperature is changing 20-25 degrees and you have a fresh water cooled system, it is not prudent to wait till the end of the season to find a good mechanic to check out the problem. 5. Rec. Boats can be a good place to get opinions and ideas, but it should not be the place to finalize any important decisions. Incorrect information is giving in UseNet all the time, sometimes, by the most knowledgeable people. Use the mfg'er web site to verify all info provided. 6. Ignoring minor problems can result in very expensive mistakes. Even those who previously owned 32' boats, can learn something new. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
JimH wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... That is not what a buddy does, a buddy should be more than just someone to join in on rec.boats personal insults. Let's try to stay focused on discussing issues and not personal insults. -- Since when has wrecked.boats not been insulting? (Wondering where Skipper is .... should be back from his "cruise" by now). Eisboch I guess it will never change. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! Try being more open about your boat and boating experiences and maybe, just maybe folks will consider your advice. Until then accept the consequences of your decision to remain totally anonymous to this NG, both in name and experience, none of which have resulting in insulting or name calling. BTW: You previously stated that *all* Volvo Penta engines need a 160F and you were promptly proved wrong. Your credibility remains at 0% Just the facts...........Jack! Reggie's stated reasons for anonymity are b.s., in case you haven't yet guessed. He plays his little game because at one point he logged on here with his "real" persona, and he doesn't want the "regulars" to guess who he really is. Harry, Are you saying, I prefer to keep my anonymity because some regulars prefer to respond with personal insults instead of sticking to the topic being discussed? -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT For Scum Who Think all Muslims are Horrible | General | |||
waterline stain | ASA | |||
The only scum lower than people who post political stuff on rec.boats.... | General | |||
Waterline Antifouling | ASA |