Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. ps - Bassy, I am playing with you because you are taking this thing way to serious. You really do need to sit back and enjoy life and not go looking for a fight on every post. The OP comment was a comment made in passing, it was not meant to be taken as the gospel. |
#42
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. |
#43
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. ps - Bassy, I am playing with you because you are taking this thing way to serious. You really do need to sit back and enjoy life and not go looking for a fight on every post. The OP comment was a comment made in passing, it was not meant to be taken as the gospel. No, but it was a knee jerk response. Most intelligent people THINK before they make comments like JimH made. He does so consitently here. Not long ago, he made a comment about a boating accident saying that the people must have been drunk rednecks. Neither was the case. |
#44
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? |
#45
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage |
#46
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? |
#47
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is. |
#48
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:09:17 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message . .. Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? Everybody - I think the consensus is that he was going too freakin' fast. Yea - and the guy who got the speed wrong was the driver :-) Capt Jack R.. |
#49
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. I could be wrong, but I think the driver fell out of the boat. And that the boat was new. of course all the warranties expired on impact. I was just glad no one was killed. and there was one less nut on the lake we enjoy - for awhile anyway.. Capt Jack R.. |
#50
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:13:44 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is. Where'd he go? Anyway, your lesson on percents from wikipedia was a knee jerk reaction. It didn't prove that 80% was better than 70%, it just said it was bigger. Bigger is not necessarily better, even if Paris Hilton says so. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|