Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]() riverman wrote: Steve Cramer wrote: Amongst a very learned treatise on canoe materials, riverman wrote: Some boats, like Coleman, use a very thin layup of ABS to save weight, and aluminum tubes to help it keep its shape. This is bad. Colemans are/were made of RAM-X polyethylene, not ABS, which is a different material altogether. The second sentence is correct. Steve You are correct, sir; Colemans are not ABS. I should have saved Coleman for the treatise on Poly boats. There is also the entire constraint of which materials are naturally buoyant or not, as well as which ones can be molded with sharper angles, and also which ones offer the best puncture resistance. Meanwhile, what do you guys think of this whole Horizon/Woodsman deal? It sounds like MR is looking to dump a bunch of Horizon-16s on the market under the radar. Anyone got any industry contacts to find out what's up? Sounds to me like CW generated a bunch of hulls that had a high percentage of blems, so they dumped the whole lot on the market under a false brand to avoid tarnishing the MR repuation. Maybe they learned from their Explorer growing pains. --riverman I think I am going to go and look one over thoughly...If it looks good I am going to pick one up... Will let you know what I find. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 15, 12:51 am, wrote:
riverman wrote: Steve Cramer wrote: Amongst a very learned treatise on canoe materials, riverman wrote: Some boats, like Coleman, use a very thin layup of ABS to save weight, and aluminum tubes to help it keep its shape. This is bad. Colemans are/were made of RAM-X polyethylene, not ABS, which is a different material altogether. The second sentence is correct. Steve You are correct, sir; Colemans are not ABS. I should have saved Coleman for the treatise on Poly boats. There is also the entire constraint of which materials are naturally buoyant or not, as well as which ones can be molded with sharper angles, and also which ones offer the best puncture resistance. Meanwhile, what do you guys think of this whole Horizon/Woodsman deal? It sounds like MR is looking to dump a bunch of Horizon-16s on the market under the radar. Anyone got any industry contacts to find out what's up? Sounds to me like CW generated a bunch of hulls that had a high percentage of blems, so they dumped the whole lot on the market under a false brand to avoid tarnishing the MR repuation. Maybe they learned from their Explorer growing pains. --riverman I think I am going to go and look one over thoughly...If it looks good I am going to pick one up... Will let you know what I find. I bought one of the Woodman canoes from Dick's. I didn't look it over well enough in the store and found a defect in the Royalex when I got it home. I've talked with the Confluence customer service people and they say the defect, a 3 x 5 inch depression in the Royalex, was caused by a misaligned "foot" that helps to form the stem. They claim that this is cosmetic, and not covered by the warranty. I have seen three other Woodman canoes with the same defect so I think they are Mad River seconds. Shame on Dick's sporting goods and Confluence Water Sports. Please let me know if you have seen the same thing so I can use the info in small claims court if it goes that far. Photographs would be great. Thanks. Robert Harris |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
I just don't understand why... | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Gently down the stream - Several Nice Canoeing Articles | General | |||
Gently down the stream - Several Nice Canoeing Articles | General |