On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:49:42 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

JLH wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:52:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Bob Smith wrote:
If you are offended by his communications, why not just kill file him.
I have..........yet he continues with his assault via email.

He's taking about killfiling his e-mail address. Just as easy as killfiling
a newsgroup poster.

If he morphs, just block the IP range that his ISP uses. Can't morph through
that.
The Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers could.

"It's Morphin' Time!!"

LOL! (Again!)

This morning I woke up to find this huge thread about a one-liner I sent
Jimmy, and I've been laughing my ass off for a half hour now!

Seriously, though, one of us just may be very homophobic, so be careful
with the gay stuff!

The word homophobia was rarely used early in the twentieth century to
mean "fear or hatred of the male sex or humankind". In this use, the
word derived from the Latin root homo (Latin, "man" or "human") with the
Greek ending -phobia ("fear").

In its more recent usage, dating from 1969, "homophobia" derives from
the -phobia ending applied, not to the Latin root "homo", but to a
shortening of homosexual. (Here, homo comes not from the Latin for
"man", but from the Greek for homosexual.) It was used by clinical
psychologist George Weinberg, who claims to have first thought of it
while speaking at a homophile group in 1965, and was popularized by his
book Society and the Healthy Homosexual in 1971. When asked about the
meaning of the word in a 2002 interview, he said:

"Homophobia is just that: a phobia. A morbid and irrational dread which
prompts irrational behavior flight or the desire to destroy the stimulus
for the phobia and anything reminiscent of it."

A possible etymological precursor was homoerotophobia, coined by
Wainwright Churchill in Homosexual Behavior Among Males in 1967.

That was excusable 'cause you hadn't sufficient time to read and react to
my previous.

Now you have.

Go back to bed.
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

JimH wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:20:30 -0500, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I will not post the latest one unless he asks me to as I will respect his
privacy.

This is boy is indeed obsessed with me (even though I KF'd him and
previously asked him not to email me) and needs some serious psychiatric
help.

Can you say 'Stalking'?

Harry.......can your wife suggest a therapist in his area?

Years ago, I had one poster accuse me of "stalking" because I had my
newsreader set to email as well as post....

... to each his own...

If you are offended by his communications, why not just kill file him.

I have..........yet he continues with his assault via email.




Just trash can the a**hole. I cannot recall a single post of his here
that was of any value, and I doubt any of his emails have more value.

I use Mailwasher Pro. You could easily set it up to catch his emails,
filter them out before you even see you got one, and then bounce it back
to him unopened.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
snip..
Sure, I suppose that if you go poking around under a skunk's tail
enough times that eventually you might find a bottle of Chanel #5 back
there- but 999,999 times out of a million you already *know* what's
going to happen when you hoist that black and white striped
dustmop....Pee-yew!

snip...

Thanks Chuck that was a very humerous and extremely accurate description
of Mr Herring efforts lately.

"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message


You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of it.
Wrong again...**** head!

My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the newsgroup! And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the newsgroup! And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.




Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:17:16 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JimH wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:20:30 -0500, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I will not post the latest one unless he asks me to as I will respect his
privacy.

This is boy is indeed obsessed with me (even though I KF'd him and
previously asked him not to email me) and needs some serious psychiatric
help.

Can you say 'Stalking'?

Harry.......can your wife suggest a therapist in his area?

Years ago, I had one poster accuse me of "stalking" because I had my
newsreader set to email as well as post....

... to each his own...

If you are offended by his communications, why not just kill file him.

I have..........yet he continues with his assault via email.




Just trash can the a**hole. I cannot recall a single post of his here
that was of any value, and I doubt any of his emails have more value.

I use Mailwasher Pro. You could easily set it up to catch his emails,
filter them out before you even see you got one, and then bounce it back
to him unopened.

Harry knows this to be true because he's had several bounced back from me!

(Sorry, Harry. I won'd do that anymore. Just use the Yahoo address.)
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:19:26 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
roups.com...
snip..
Sure, I suppose that if you go poking around under a skunk's tail
enough times that eventually you might find a bottle of Chanel #5 back
there- but 999,999 times out of a million you already *know* what's
going to happen when you hoist that black and white striped
dustmop....Pee-yew!

snip...

Thanks Chuck that was a very humerous and extremely accurate description
of Mr Herring efforts lately.


Good Morning, Don!

I'm glad to see you and Harry are up and about and having a good time this
morning.

Y'all are so neat!!


--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
JLH wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:52:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Bob Smith wrote:
If you are offended by his communications, why not just kill file
him.
I have..........yet he continues with his assault via email.

He's taking about killfiling his e-mail address. Just as easy as
killfiling a newsgroup poster.

If he morphs, just block the IP range that his ISP uses. Can't morph
through that.
The Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers could.

"It's Morphin' Time!!"

LOL! (Again!)

This morning I woke up to find this huge thread about a one-liner I sent
Jimmy, and I've been laughing my ass off for a half hour now!

Seriously, though, one of us just may be very homophobic, so be careful
with the gay stuff!

The word homophobia was rarely used early in the twentieth century to
mean "fear or hatred of the male sex or humankind". In this use, the
word derived from the Latin root homo (Latin, "man" or "human") with the
Greek ending -phobia ("fear").

In its more recent usage, dating from 1969, "homophobia" derives from
the -phobia ending applied, not to the Latin root "homo", but to a
shortening of homosexual. (Here, homo comes not from the Latin for
"man", but from the Greek for homosexual.) It was used by clinical
psychologist George Weinberg, who claims to have first thought of it
while speaking at a homophile group in 1965, and was popularized by his
book Society and the Healthy Homosexual in 1971. When asked about the
meaning of the word in a 2002 interview, he said:

"Homophobia is just that: a phobia. A morbid and irrational dread which
prompts irrational behavior flight or the desire to destroy the stimulus
for the phobia and anything reminiscent of it."

A possible etymological precursor was homoerotophobia, coined by
Wainwright Churchill in Homosexual Behavior Among Males in 1967.

Tom,
Is there going to be a test on all of this information?

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:23:33 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the newsgroup! And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.




Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

Are Jimmy's hazel?

Y'all could be "The Neato Hazeltones"!

Cool. Everyone would want to join the club. Hazel contact lenses would
become all the rage.

Let us know if you do. We'll want to buy some stock in these guys:

http://tinyurl.com/2o8hlw

--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

"JLH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:23:33 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the newsgroup!
And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.




Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

Are Jimmy's hazel?

Y'all could be "The Neato Hazeltones"!

Cool. Everyone would want to join the club. Hazel contact lenses would
become all the rage.

Let us know if you do. We'll want to buy some stock in these guys:

http://tinyurl.com/2o8hlw

--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

Now John... I can understand you spewing your foolishness about Harry, Jim &
me.
Tim on the other hand has been very supportive of you. What about your free
gift?
Does he have to keep bribing you to maintain your friendship?