"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:20:30 -0500, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I will not post the latest one unless he asks me to as I will respect
his
privacy.

This is boy is indeed obsessed with me (even though I KF'd him and
previously asked him not to email me) and needs some serious
psychiatric
help.

Can you say 'Stalking'?

Harry.......can your wife suggest a therapist in his area?

Years ago, I had one poster accuse me of "stalking" because I had my
newsreader set to email as well as post....

... to each his own...

If you are offended by his communications, why not just kill file him.

I have..........yet he continues with his assault via email.


Just trash can the a**hole. I cannot recall a single post of his here that
was of any value, and I doubt any of his emails have more value.

I use Mailwasher Pro. You could easily set it up to catch his emails,
filter them out before you even see you got one, and then bounce it back
to him unopened.


I forgot about that feature in Mailwasher Pro. It is now done and he shall
bother me no more via email.

TaTa Sheriff John.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"JLH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:23:33 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the newsgroup!
And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.




Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

Are Jimmy's hazel?

Y'all could be "The Neato Hazeltones"!

Cool. Everyone would want to join the club. Hazel contact lenses would
become all the rage.

Let us know if you do. We'll want to buy some stock in these guys:

http://tinyurl.com/2o8hlw

--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

Now John... I can understand you spewing your foolishness about Harry, Jim
& me.
Tim on the other hand has been very supportive of you. What about your
free gift?
Does he have to keep bribing you to maintain your friendship?

ROTF!!!

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:36:10 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JLH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:23:33 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the newsgroup!
And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.




Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

Are Jimmy's hazel?

Y'all could be "The Neato Hazeltones"!

Cool. Everyone would want to join the club. Hazel contact lenses would
become all the rage.

Let us know if you do. We'll want to buy some stock in these guys:

http://tinyurl.com/2o8hlw

--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

Now John... I can understand you spewing your foolishness about Harry, Jim &
me.
Tim on the other hand has been very supportive of you. What about your free
gift?
Does he have to keep bribing you to maintain your friendship?


Pray tell - what brought Tim up? Have I said something derogatory about
Tim? Or about you? Or Harry? Bribing?

Wow!
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

On Feb 13, 6:55�am, JLH wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:36:10 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:







"JLH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:23:33 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
legroups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the newsgroup!
And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....

Mine too.... * * that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.

Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

Are Jimmy's hazel?

Y'all could be "The Neato Hazeltones"!

Cool. Everyone would want to join the club. Hazel contact lenses would
become all the rage.

Let us know if you do. We'll want to buy some stock in these guys:

http://tinyurl.com/2o8hlw

--
***** Have a super day! *****

* * * * *John H

Now John... I can understand you spewing your foolishness about Harry, Jim &
me.
Tim on the other hand has been very supportive of you. What about your free
gift?
Does he have to keep bribing you to maintain your friendship?

Pray tell - what brought Tim up? Have I said something derogatory about
Tim? Or about you? Or Harry? Bribing?

Wow!
--
***** Have a super day! *****

* * * * * John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Everybody gets a turn in the barrel. You can find out a lot about some
folks while in there. There's the initial attack thread that puts you
temporarily in the barrel- and it doesn't take a seer to comprehend
that person's attitude toward his or her target. I think it's more
bizarre, and at least as disappointing, to watch some others "pile
on". I swear, somtimes I think this group includes a bunch of old
women who pose under male screen names. :-)

On Feb 13, 5:19�am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...
snip..
Sure, I suppose that if you go poking around under a skunk's tail enough times that eventually you might find a bottle of Chanel #5 back
there- but 999,999 times out of a million you already *know* what's
going to happen when you hoist that black and white striped
dustmop....Pee-yew!

snip...

Thanks Chuck *that was a very humerous and extremely accurate *description
of Mr Herring efforts lately.

It wasn't intended to be a description of Mr. Herring's efforts,
merely an example of repeatedly doing something that has previously
yielded unpleasant results (opening an email from a nemesis) and
expecting to be pleasantly surprised rather than disappointed once
again. Apologies to JohnH if others thought I was comparing him,
personally, to a skunk.

"JLH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:36:10 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JLH" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:23:33 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

Don White wrote:
*"Tim" wrote in message*
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of
it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the
newsgroup!
And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

*My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....*

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.




Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

Are Jimmy's hazel?

Y'all could be "The Neato Hazeltones"!

Cool. Everyone would want to join the club. Hazel contact lenses would
become all the rage.

Let us know if you do. We'll want to buy some stock in these guys:

http://tinyurl.com/2o8hlw

--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

Now John... I can understand you spewing your foolishness about Harry, Jim
&
me.
Tim on the other hand has been very supportive of you. What about your
free
gift?
Does he have to keep bribing you to maintain your friendship?


Pray tell - what brought Tim up? Have I said something derogatory about
Tim? Or about you? Or Harry? Bribing?

Wow!
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

John...I'm becoming concerned about you.
Tim was the first one to declare his eyes were hazel.....
*"My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low...."*

Please try to comprehend what you read.

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 13, 5:19�am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...
snip..
Sure, I suppose that if you go poking around under a skunk's tail enough times that eventually you might find a bottle of Chanel #5 back
there- but 999,999 times out of a million you already *know* what's
going to happen when you hoist that black and white striped
dustmop....Pee-yew!
snip...

Thanks Chuck �that was a very humerous and extremely accurate �description
of Mr Herring efforts lately.

It wasn't intended to be a description of Mr. Herring's efforts,
merely an example of repeatedly doing something that has previously
yielded unpleasant results (opening an email from a nemesis) and
expecting to be pleasantly surprised rather than disappointed once
again. Apologies to JohnH if others thought I was comparing him,
personally, to a skunk.



There you go, insulting skunks again. :}

On 13 Feb 2007 08:01:16 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

On Feb 13, 5:19?am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...
snip..
Sure, I suppose that if you go poking around under a skunk's tail enough times that eventually you might find a bottle of Chanel #5 back
there- but 999,999 times out of a million you already *know* what's
going to happen when you hoist that black and white striped
dustmop....Pee-yew!

snip...

Thanks Chuck 4hat was a very humerous and extremely accurate $escription
of Mr Herring efforts lately.

It wasn't intended to be a description of Mr. Herring's efforts,
merely an example of repeatedly doing something that has previously
yielded unpleasant results (opening an email from a nemesis) and
expecting to be pleasantly surprised rather than disappointed once
again. Apologies to JohnH if others thought I was comparing him,
personally, to a skunk.

I took it as a compliment! :)

As a kid I had a pet skunk. They make cool pets. This one had not been
descented, and my folks couldn't afford to do so. But, it never sprayed me
or anyone handling it with me.

But, if anyone tried to pick it up while I wasn't around, they got sprayed.
This proved to be the skunks undoing. One day it escaped from it's room in
the barn and got on the neighbor's back porch. The neighbor tried to scare
it off the porch, and, naturally, got himself sprayed.

The skunk got shot with a .22.

I was very sad.

Still am, as a matter of fact.
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:07:51 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JLH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:36:10 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JLH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:23:33 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

Don White wrote:
*"Tim" wrote in message*
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 10:01?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

You are so full of ****, you probably have brown eyes because of
it.
Wrong again...**** head!
My **** stock is not full, so not a **** head. You are full of ****,
because you can not avoid piling into a pile of **** on the
newsgroup!
And
you just keep absorbing more until now you are full of it.-

*My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low....*

Mine too.... that is hazel.. not about the volume or lack of s*it.




Hmmm. Mine are hazel, too. Maybe we can form a club...

Are Jimmy's hazel?

Y'all could be "The Neato Hazeltones"!

Cool. Everyone would want to join the club. Hazel contact lenses would
become all the rage.

Let us know if you do. We'll want to buy some stock in these guys:

http://tinyurl.com/2o8hlw

--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

Now John... I can understand you spewing your foolishness about Harry, Jim
&
me.
Tim on the other hand has been very supportive of you. What about your
free
gift?
Does he have to keep bribing you to maintain your friendship?


Pray tell - what brought Tim up? Have I said something derogatory about
Tim? Or about you? Or Harry? Bribing?

Wow!
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

John...I'm becoming concerned about you.
Tim was the first one to declare his eyes were hazel.....
*"My eyes are "hazel" so I suppose I'm about half a quart low...."*

Please try to comprehend what you read.


I've said nothing derogatory about hazel eyes. Hell, my eyes are hazel! I
realize, however, that I'm not nearly as neat as you three and couldn't get
into the 'Neato Hazeltones'!
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
JLH wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:52:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Bob Smith wrote:
If you are offended by his communications, why not just kill file
him.
I have..........yet he continues with his assault via email.

He's taking about killfiling his e-mail address. Just as easy as
killfiling a newsgroup poster.

If he morphs, just block the IP range that his ISP uses. Can't
morph through that.
The Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers could.

"It's Morphin' Time!!"

LOL! (Again!)

This morning I woke up to find this huge thread about a one-liner I sent
Jimmy, and I've been laughing my ass off for a half hour now!

Seriously, though, one of us just may be very homophobic, so be careful
with the gay stuff!

The word homophobia was rarely used early in the twentieth century to
mean "fear or hatred of the male sex or humankind". In this use, the
word derived from the Latin root homo (Latin, "man" or "human") with
the Greek ending -phobia ("fear").

In its more recent usage, dating from 1969, "homophobia" derives from
the -phobia ending applied, not to the Latin root "homo", but to a
shortening of homosexual. (Here, homo comes not from the Latin for
"man", but from the Greek for homosexual.) It was used by clinical
psychologist George Weinberg, who claims to have first thought of it
while speaking at a homophile group in 1965, and was popularized by
his book Society and the Healthy Homosexual in 1971. When asked about
the meaning of the word in a 2002 interview, he said:

"Homophobia is just that: a phobia. A morbid and irrational dread
which prompts irrational behavior flight or the desire to destroy the
stimulus for the phobia and anything reminiscent of it."

A possible etymological precursor was homoerotophobia, coined by
Wainwright Churchill in Homosexual Behavior Among Males in 1967.

Tom,
Is there going to be a test on all of this information?

Eventually.

I do grade on a curve though.