I will not post the latest one unless he asks me to as I will respect his
privacy.

This is boy is indeed obsessed with me (even though I KF'd him and
previously asked him not to email me) and needs some serious psychiatric
help.

Can you say 'Stalking'?

Harry.......can your wife suggest a therapist in his area?

JimH wrote:
I will not post the latest one unless he asks me to as I will respect his
privacy.

This is boy is indeed obsessed with me (even though I KF'd him and
previously asked him not to email me) and needs some serious psychiatric
help.

Can you say 'Stalking'?

Harry.......can your wife suggest a therapist in his area?



Wow, when did sending an email become stalking? I probably send out
10-20 emails a day, I would hate to have the police bust in my door for
"Stalking".

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

On Feb 12, 4:42�pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"


For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. *If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.


Wise counsel.

On Feb 12, 8:12 pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"




For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

Wise counsel.

Done...........some 6 months ago.

Perhaps John Herring has a reading comprehension problem.

JimH wrote:
On Feb 12, 8:12 pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"




For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.
Wise counsel.

Done...........some 6 months ago.

Perhaps John Herring has a reading comprehension problem.


If someone really doesn't want to read anyone's email, all he has to do
is filter that individual. You won't see or even know the email was
sent, but then, you wouldn't be able to pretend you are being "Stalked".
There is no logical reason to start a thread a new thread to express
your concern about "Stalking".

Harry was last person JimH thought was stalking him. That "Stalking"
claim lasted for years, and was injected into just about every thread in
the NG. Hopefully this claim of "Stalking" will have a much shorter
life.

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42�pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. �If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

Wise counsel.

But but...

It's funny...

On Feb 12, 8:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

Wise counsel.

But but...

It's funny...

Actually it isn't.

JimH wrote:
On Feb 12, 8:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.
Wise counsel.
But but...

It's funny...

Actually it isn't.

I'm sorry Jim, but it is hysterical.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"


For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.


Wise counsel.
+++++++++++

Indeed it is..............and indeed it was done so over 6 months ago.

Having done so..............it is now considered stalking.

Understanding this.........let me know if you condone of such stalking
tactics.

On Feb 12, 5:34?pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"




For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

Wise counsel.
+++++++++++

Indeed it is..............and indeed it was done so over 6 months ago.

Having done so..............it is now considered stalking.

Understanding this.........let me know if you condone of such stalking
tactics.


No, I don't condone stalking.

However, if I had a very poor relationship with somebody- or more
accurately if one of the somebodies I have a very poor relationship
with sent me an email and I saw it in the "in" box, I might or might
not open it.

If I did open it and if it were unpleasant, I would have to blame
myself for opening it almost as much as the other party for sending
it. Sure, I suppose that if you go poking around under a skunk's tail
enough times that eventually you might find a bottle of Chanel #5 back
there- but 999,999 times out of a million you already *know* what's
going to happen when you hoist that black and white striped
dustmop....Pee-yew!

At this juncture, the only thing in evidence is your claim that JohnH
sent you a disturbing or insulting email. Opening a thread to complain
about it is a lose-lose proposition for you. There are those who might
suspect you are making this up, as you haven't revealed the nature of
the email. If you *did* reveal the nature of the email, there are
others who would come down on you for that.
Still others will think this is a silly subject that doesn't concern
anybody except the two parties involved, and should be resolved
outside the group- otherwise it's a lot like the kid who raises his
hand immediately after a grade school recess to report, "Teacher, so-
and-so called me a name on the playground!".

In an effort to cast a bad light on somebody else, we often find we
have all but painted ourselves into a corner where more fingers will
be pointed at us than the party we complain against. Therefore, I
believe Reggie's comment about resolving this outside a public
discussion forum was sage advice. If you don't want to read emails
from JohnH, don't open 'em.