Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message news ![]() I understand your point if taking a distant view from outer space. At close range however the moon is revolving around the earth, and the earth is spinning on its axis. That says to me that the geographic position of the barycenter is constantly shifting with respect to the earth's surface. "It" doesn't shift. It's just never in the same place. Eisboch :-) |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:13:10 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: No. It induces a wobble in the larger object. That's how NASA, Ames and JPL do those extra solar planet searches with the Spitzer X-Ray and Hubble telescopes - they look for the star wobble and aim for where the planet should be based on the arc of the wobble. The barycenter is the barycenter - the center of mass of any system of objects. I understand your point if taking a distant view from outer space. At close range however the moon is revolving around the earth, and the earth is spinning on its axis. That says to me that the geographic position of the barycenter is constantly shifting with respect to the earth's surface. Hmmmm - I guess you could put it that way in terms of geography. You could also say that the Earth is spinning around the barycenter. For example, it you had two bodies on the same plane orbiting each other, the barycenter is located in space between the two - it doesn't move as long as the masses are balanced by the mechanical motion. Or take another case. Say you have a large rotating body around which a smaller, but massive body rotates. The barycenter is just above the surface of the larger body. The barycenter never changes position - it is the balance point, but the structure below it changes. Good God, I haven't worked with these concepts in ages. I have a headache. :) |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 3:21?pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... In the interest of sustaining this worthwhile feature in the NG..... Here are several online nautical word/phrase dictionaries, one that even offers a nautical word of the day: http://www.geocities.com/cjstein_2000/dictionary.html http://www.seatalk.info/ http://www.marinewaypoints.com/learn...glossary.shtml The purpose of the NG isn't to come up with astonishing content that can't be found anywhere else in the world, it's to kick around ideas (not personalities) for discussion. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:42:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: Good God, I haven't worked with these concepts in ages. I have a headache. :) Sorry I made your head spin. But wait, it was already spinning... No sympathy here. I've been reading Isaac Asimov's "Asimov on Physics" in my spare time. It is an incredibly lucid and readable account of some very esoteric concepts. Published in 1976 but available used on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Asimov-Physics.../dp/0380418487 |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 22, 3:21?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... In the interest of sustaining this worthwhile feature in the NG..... Here are several online nautical word/phrase dictionaries, one that even offers a nautical word of the day: http://www.geocities.com/cjstein_2000/dictionary.html http://www.seatalk.info/ http://www.marinewaypoints.com/learn...glossary.shtml The purpose of the NG isn't to come up with astonishing content that can't be found anywhere else in the world, it's to kick around ideas (not personalities) for discussion. If you took my reply personally that is your problem. I was only trying to help you and the NG with other resources on how to locate "nautical words of the day". Don't take things so personally Chuck..............breath in.............breath out................breath in..............(repeat)..... Have a nice night Chuck! |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 22, 3:21?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... In the interest of sustaining this worthwhile feature in the NG..... Here are several online nautical word/phrase dictionaries, one that even offers a nautical word of the day: http://www.geocities.com/cjstein_2000/dictionary.html http://www.seatalk.info/ http://www.marinewaypoints.com/learn...glossary.shtml The purpose of the NG isn't to come up with astonishing content that can't be found anywhere else in the world, it's to kick around ideas (not personalities) for discussion. Chuck, Now that we have those 3 links, we no longer need to discuss boating in the NG. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Feb 2007 19:28:27 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: it's to kick around ideas (not personalities) for discussion. Thanks. My personality has been kicked around enough already. :-) |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 8:43?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "remove
wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Feb 22, 3:21?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message roups.com... In the interest of sustaining this worthwhile feature in the NG..... Here are several online nautical word/phrase dictionaries, one that even offers a nautical word of the day: http://www.geocities.com/cjstein_2000/dictionary.html http://www.seatalk.info/ http://www.marinewaypoints.com/learn...glossary.shtml The purpose of the NG isn't to come up with astonishing content that can't be found anywhere else in the world, it's to kick around ideas (not personalities) for discussion. Chuck, Now that we have those 3 links, we no longer need to discuss boating in the NG.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's a frequently recurring theme. The value of Google or other search engines is to locate sources of often conflicting information. The value of a NG, (IMO) is to create a place where people can discuss and debate ideas that relate to the topic, share personal experiences, etc. The NG would be a very frustrating format for anybody who felt their only purpose was to extract an enormous amount of general information, and I agree with JimH, Shortwave, and others that there's no shortage of free information already circulating on nearly any conceivable subject. Much of that free information is worth exactly the selling price. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 7:43�pm, "JimH" wrote:
If you took my reply personally that is your problem. *I was only trying to help you and the NG with other resources on how to locate "nautical words of the day". I didn't, so I have no problem. The nautical word item seems to generate quite a bit of on-topic discussion, doesn't it? I'll bet that's pretty surprising to somebody who wrote that the original nautical word posting was a "joke that everybody else got except you." Life is full of surprises. Some of them pleasant. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:42:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: Good God, I haven't worked with these concepts in ages. I have a headache. :) Sorry I made your head spin. But wait, it was already spinning... No sympathy here. I've been reading Isaac Asimov's "Asimov on Physics" in my spare time. It is an incredibly lucid and readable account of some very esoteric concepts. Published in 1976 but available used on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Asimov-Physics.../dp/0380418487 It's in my library - autographed no less. :) Did I ever tell you the story of how I met him? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No nautical word of the day? | General | |||
Nautical Word of The Day... | General | |||
Nice nautical gift store...... | General | |||
Nautical word fun | General |