Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:50:16 -0400, "JimH"
wrote: "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message It shows that you never bothered learning just about anything. A Mac26? A Mac26? Bwahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahhahahahhahahahhahahah ahah! Were you a WAVE in the Navy? Wilbur Hubbard See ya! plunk Good idea. Sorry to bring this on, but it's par for the course when the Mac 26 is "discussed." I posted to the cruising group too, hoping for some useful input, and already got some. "Wilbur" is the Rod Speed of the boating groups, but like Speed, often has useful/insightful posts when he's not making you gag. Since "Wilbur" is a real sailor and a more entertaining writer than Speed, he's worthwhile when he's not baby talking or insulting people to no purpose. --Vic |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Good idea. Sorry to bring this on, but it's par for the course when the Mac 26 is "discussed." I posted to the cruising group too, hoping for some useful input, and already got some. "Wilbur" is the Rod Speed of the boating groups, but like Speed, often has useful/insightful posts when he's not making you gag. Since "Wilbur" is a real sailor and a more entertaining writer than Speed, he's worthwhile when he's not baby talking or insulting people to no purpose. --Vic definitions: Any ways you got good advice from a bunch of folks: since i do not "sail" but was on ships for most of my life. I would say the other leg of this stool is to go a talk to some of the folks down on the gulf coast of florida and on up to texas face to face and ask questions. if this boat is not going to be anyplace else you might not need what you think you need. 2MT |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:48:24 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: Now I want to try that Flying Scot, but I've got no doubt it'll make the Max 26 feel like a dog under sail. More like 3 dogs :-) The Flying Scot will run circles around it. The mac 26 is just too big a compromise in my opinion. Most people end up using them under power most of the time, and they aren't nearly as well suited for that as a real power boat. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Mar 2007 16:50:30 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: With a single outboard, you can realize some pretty impressive speeds when in the "powerboat mode". Strangely enough, this hardly interests me, although since it's there I'll probably make use of it at one time or another. I'm really not at all interested in speed, and would be content with a trawler or tug if that could happily meet my finances. My goals have a lot vested in economy. Sails suit that well with the silent pleasure aspect of sailing thrown in. As far as interior accommodation goes- that small cockpit that restricts your fishing room translates into about 3 times the interior cabin room of most 26-foot powerboats. Good point, and one I easily forget when thinking about how I'm going to fish from that boat. I *really* need some hands-on time. As you can see, there are certain brands of boats (usually among the more moderately priced) where ownership comes with a steady barrage of nasty comments from nasty people who can't wait to tell you what a dunce you were for not buying whatever brand they happen to own. I have to wonder how many people wind up buying a beat up old hulk with an "acceptable" trade name on it just to avoid dealing with such jerks? Or a new Honda instead of a used Chevy (-: Being a used Chevy guy, my skin deflects all arrows. And has some bearing on why I can afford a boat in the first place! I still think you'd be no worse off with a new Mac 26, (given the rest of your requirements) than you would be with a 1979 version of a "real" sailboat (with "real" headaches) for maybe the same kind of money. Thanks for your comments, Chuck. --Vic |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:39:35 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: snippity-snip No. He was a Canadian psychologist who along with Ayn Rand defined Objectivism - basically the precursor of Libertarianism. Was a member of a group called "The Collective" which had some interesting members including Alan Greenspan. Which explains the gooble de gook Greenspan used during his Congressional testimony. Want to give yourself a headache? Parse the following: "The issue of concepts (known as "the problem of universals") is philosophy's central issue. Since man's knowledge is gained and held in conceptual form, the validity of man's knowledge depends upon the validity of concepts. But concepts are abstractions or universals, and everything that man perceives is particular, concrete. What is the relationship between abstractions and concretes? To what precisely do concepts refer in reality? Do they refer to something real, something that exist - or are they merely inventions of man's mind, arbitrary constructs or loose approximations that can not claim to represent knowledge?" I'll wait. :) Easy. "Is it live, or is it Memorex?" sums it up nicely. Mark E. Williams |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:11:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: Rod Speed sounds like a good name for a porn star. He's an Aussie, and that's his real name. Quite a pest, but sometimes actually makes good sense. On the other hand, Wilbur Hubbard sounds like the victim in a noir crime novel. :) LOL. You're right. Hubbard Speed would be a great name for a band. :) On that too. --Vic |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Mar 2007 18:13:21 -0700, "Two meter troll"
wrote: Any ways you got good advice from a bunch of folks: since i do not "sail" but was on ships for most of my life. I'll sure remember what you said about wiring. I would say the other leg of this stool is to go a talk to some of the folks down on the gulf coast of florida and on up to texas face to face and ask questions. if this boat is not going to be anyplace else you might not need what you think you need. 2MT Sounds like an excellent idea. And a nice vacation too! --Vic |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:48:24 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: Now I want to try that Flying Scot, but I've got no doubt it'll make the Max 26 feel like a dog under sail. More like 3 dogs :-) The Flying Scot will run circles around it. The mac 26 is just too big a compromise in my opinion. Most people end up using them under power most of the time, and they aren't nearly as well suited for that as a real power boat. Far from defending the Mac26, I will say that there are situations when it seems to be appropriate. For example, I know a couple who have one, and they almost exclusively explore the marshland near a community in the SF bayarea. They don't venture out onto the bay much... perhaps 5 percent of the time and then only in the south bay. They like bird watching and don't want to kayak, since they stay out for a couple of days in a row. I think they do sail it a bit, but mostly they motor very slowly hither and yon. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vic Smith wrote:
Thanks. Nice boat, but might be a bit rich for my blood. Hadn't seen it before even with all my browsing. You may be right on target though, and I take your advice to try out what I'm buying before I buy it to heart. You gave me another avenue to explore. Although I'm not young, I'm still in pretty good shape, and do like the idea of sailing, having crewed some. --Vic Heck, Vic. My boat is smaller that that - a LOT smaller - and we do fine for a few nights. Who you are with makes a big difference. Richard |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 6:52�pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:48:24 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: Now I want to try that Flying Scot, but I've got no doubt it'll make the Max 26 feel like a dog under sail. More like 3 dogs * *:-) The Flying Scot will run circles around it. The mac 26 is just too big a compromise in my opinion. *Most people end up using them under power most of the time, and they aren't nearly as well suited for that as a real power boat. Good observation. It may be regionally significant, or not. The best months for sailing in my region are when it's pretty cold and still peeing down rain in the spring and fall. The winds don't come up until late in the afternoon a lot of midsummer days when the weather is warmer. As a result, most of the sailboats in this corner of the country operate under power most of the time. Sailing seems to be reserved for racing, or for screwing around with for an hour or two after arriving in the general vicinity of the ultimate daily destination. Of course there are scattered exceptions, just enough to prove the rule. From that respect, a MacGregor that spent most of its time in powerboat mode wouldn't vary much from a more elite brand doing the same thing. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Group claims PWC sales up, accidents down, and gas prices not reducing boating activity | General | |||
Safer Boating | Boat Building | |||
Safer Boating | Cruising | |||
Boating Safer | General | |||
So where is...................... | General |