Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I do extensive reading in trying to select what boat will suit me
best, I realize just how much fun boating is. And I haven't even left the basement! Right now I'm leaning toward the MacGregor 26M. Might be new, might be used. It's usually called a "motor sailor" It's a high volume boat, inexpensive, and generally frowned upon by the "high speed" sailing crowd. When under sail it doesn't perform as well as dedicated sailboats, though no single keel sailboat of similar size is exactly a speed demon. Some of the Mac's sailing performance deficit is inherent in its dual purpose design, and some appears to be because those who buy this Mac are not hard core sailors, and don't lend much effort to getting the most of its sailing capabilities. Everybody has different preferences in what they want from a boat, and I'm laying out some of mine here. They might change when I get more experience, and they are in the end a balancing act, as always. -- Sailing area. The boat will be used exclusively to cruise the west coast of Florida, from the panhandle to the Keys. -- Purpose. Slow cruising and fishing. Hook swinging in shallow, sheltered areas, exploring islands. Shallow draft (+-18") is essential for this, and I won't bend here. I don't dinghy. Had enough dinghying/whaleboating when I was in the navy. On the fishing side it looks like the Mac cockpit is small, and freeboard all around is high, so it's sure not the best fishing platform, but I could fish off a jetski, so it's not a deal killer. Cruising might be a month out from home port, and I'll cover that under other categories. Might get some subjects confused in a category, but I'll do my best to keep organized. -- Economy. My purchase/equip budget is @30k. But that's if ongoing costs aren't going to eat me up. The Mac is trailerable, so when not in use it can be stored at relatively low cost. Despite its detractors, the Mac can move under sail from one place to another. It might be tender, it might not point well, etc, etc. No fuel used under sail. Under power at less than hull speed, I believe the boat is a fuel miser compared to similar sized power boats and heavier but similar sized sailboats. When wind on the freeboard affects that economy, there's probably wind to sail instead. On the economy related new/used issue, I'll make my points under the construction topic. --Livability. I just don't have the experience here, from what I've read the Mac is as comfortable as any 26. Since I've tented for weeks at a time, I don't see a problem with it. I'm not going to be living on the boat. Me and the wife on 2-6 week cruises, and we are not tall, and not fat. --Construction. I've seen many "better" sailboats recommended by the "real" sailors to those considering the Mac 26M. This in order to get a "real" used sailboat for the price of a new Mac. When I started looking at some of the recommendations I found most are boats 20-40 years old. There might be a problem even getting insurance on these. Besides, who wants a decrepit (insert pet sailboat here), mildew-stinking, stringer rotting, engine-dying, sail-rotting, barnicle-embedded, crap-in-the-bilge old ill-maintained boat when you can get a new Mac? Some of these sailors bragging about how well their cachet-name sailboat is maintained probably don't do anything but shine brightwork, and leave Brasso swirls when doing that. Besides that, some of these boats are floating supported by 1/8" of glass over 1/4" of chopper-gun crud over a layer of poorly wetted cloth. From what I've read the production process used in building the Mac has more QC than most boat builders use. I still don't know enough about that and other construction details to buy one, but I can find out, even if I have to visit the plant. No teak, plenty of minor fit/finish complaints, light hardware, etc. A solid boat suitable for my purposes, or so it seems. Anyway, even an experienced surveyor can't always find the real quality of a boat. Somebody recommended the Parker-Dawson 26 over the Mac and when I looked for info I found owners discovering deck cleats had not even large washers as backing. One came adrift because of this and he lost the boat on the rocks. http://www.parkerdawson.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=288 Now I'm not knocking this boat, just saying even a new boat must be gone over with a fine toothed comb, and an old boat may have well concealed problems that won't be found without taking it apart If they weren't questionable due to age, I'd much prefer a Dawson over a Mac. Of course they were 40k new in 1983, and cross oceans. Some people are willing to buy an old boat and spend a lot of time bringing it up to snuff. Not only do I not have the time or inclination, I get irritable when pulling off half-assed or unsuitable mods. So besides the issue of how a boat has been maintained and whether initial construction is going to bite you, there is the "clean slate" factor in making modifications. This is possible even with a used recent Mac 26, because they aren't normally used as liveaboards and probably not much as overnighters. From perusing the Mac site I see some have added air, gensets, dodgers, extra fresh water, etc. The cabin is an open design from the factory with minimal cabinetry. When first looking at sailers, I tended toward a small diesel for economy when motoring. But now I think the lost interior space and maintenance/cost issues of the diesel in a 26' boat make me lean in favor of a small 4-stroke on the transom. Just as most sailboaters recommend against the Mac 26M, the owners of the Mac 26M generally recommend max HP OB. I'm not buying that either, since I won't be pulling tubes or skis as many of them do, or be in a hurry as many of them are. I'll be looking for my balance between sailing and powering in terms of OB weight. Depending on tradeoffs, I'm not even sure I would get the boat on plane, which is one of its hull-type selling points. I had originally thought along the lines of a 24' Carolina Skiff for mostly short fishing trips, maybe some hook swinging under a popup which some CS owners do. The CS is another economical, shallow draft and highly modifiable boat. But on a price/versatily basis the Mac has the CS beat - for me. Anyway, I'm still learning and all ears for any comments. But please don't make my ears turn red. OTOH, since I'm an old navy guy, that might be impossible. --Vic .. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Group claims PWC sales up, accidents down, and gas prices not reducing boating activity | General | |||
Safer Boating | Boat Building | |||
Safer Boating | Cruising | |||
Boating Safer | General | |||
So where is...................... | General |