On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:47:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
. ..
In message , JoeSpareBedroom sprach
forth the following:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
...
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach forth the following:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in
message ...
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach forth the following:

Would you agree that the 3 entities below have created public
impressions that are hard to change?

1) Wal Mart
2) Used car dealers
3) Law firms

Wal Mart has more customers than any business in the world.

Used car dealers don't make any money unless they attract customers
either.

Lawyers are the primary contributors to Democrats.


You're not much of a dancer.

No, I demonstrated that you have contempt for success and supplication
for the John Edwardses of the world.

You demonstrated that once again, you've danced around someone's
question because to answer it honestly, you'd step in quicksand.

Your question was an AVOIDANCE NON-ANSWER TO TO QUESTIONS I POSED.


No it was not. The point was that every business creates its image, or as
Harry pointed out, earns it, for better or worse. The 3 in the list are
perfect examples. Wal Mart's got a miserable reputation with as many people
as those who love the place. Used car dealers are seen as snakes, much the
same as lawyers. You are fully aware of all this.

The major oil companies are no different. They offer us bull****
explanations for the price swings. If you kids gave you similar answers,
there would be consequences, assuming you were a competent parent.



Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and the
major media, because it won't unionize.

On 30 May 2007 16:42:11 GMT, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:

In message , John H. sprach
forth the following:

There, is that more enlightening?

Jackoff Spare Birdbrain is immune to enlightenment.

I try not to get into the name-calling pattern. But, your point has been
made. Several times.

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:43:15 -0500, John H.
wrote:

You've picked a winner, Gene.

Who he is doesn't mean that he is wrong.... unless you are trying to
say that a person's political affiliation determines the veracity of
their statements.


That's everything to someone like Herring. He's one of five remaining
voters who still supports Bush's war against Iraq.

On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:03:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:47:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
. ..
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach
forth the following:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
...
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach forth the following:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in
message ...
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach forth the following:

Would you agree that the 3 entities below have created public
impressions that are hard to change?

1) Wal Mart
2) Used car dealers
3) Law firms

Wal Mart has more customers than any business in the world.

Used car dealers don't make any money unless they attract customers
either.

Lawyers are the primary contributors to Democrats.


You're not much of a dancer.

No, I demonstrated that you have contempt for success and supplication
for the John Edwardses of the world.

You demonstrated that once again, you've danced around someone's
question because to answer it honestly, you'd step in quicksand.

Your question was an AVOIDANCE NON-ANSWER TO TO QUESTIONS I POSED.


No it was not. The point was that every business creates its image, or as
Harry pointed out, earns it, for better or worse. The 3 in the list are
perfect examples. Wal Mart's got a miserable reputation with as many
people
as those who love the place. Used car dealers are seen as snakes, much the
same as lawyers. You are fully aware of all this.

The major oil companies are no different. They offer us bull****
explanations for the price swings. If you kids gave you similar answers,
there would be consequences, assuming you were a competent parent.



Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and
the
major media, because it won't unionize.

I don't give a damn about their union situation. I'm talking about the
customer experience, and the fact they they lie about their prices, and that
"made in America" charade.


In my experience, they lie about prices less than Safeway, and I've no idea
what the 'made in America' charade is about. I think you've concocted both.
Much, if not most, of Wal Mart's stuff comes from China. Harry, the other
liberals, including yourself, seem to be in the forefront of finding
anything to help point fingers at Wal Mart.

It's all liberal smoke because they won't unionize.

They have good deals on fishing gear, BTW.

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:03:41 -0500, John H.
wrote:


Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and
the
major media, because it won't unionize.

That is the only complaint that you have heard about walmart? Now, I
gotta issue a horse pucky alert!

Check out some of these non-union issues:
http://walmar****ch.com/issues/

Trust me, in the 22 states with right-to-work laws, walmart sucks just
as bad as they do elsewhere.



You people are pointing your fingers at the wrong culprit. Wal-Mart is
popular and successful because they carry what people want at prices that
people want to pay.

So, who's at fault?

Eisboch (on da boat)

On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:28:30 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:03:41 -0500, John H.
wrote:


Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and the
major media, because it won't unionize.

That is the only complaint that you have heard about walmart? Now, I
gotta issue a horse pucky alert!

Check out some of these non-union issues:
http://walmar****ch.com/issues/

Trust me, in the 22 states with right-to-work laws, walmart sucks just
as bad as they do elsewhere.



Oh my gosh! A purely non biased organization whose sole function is to
keep an eye on Wal Mart? Wow, I wonder who funds it.

Oh gosh, look, Andrew Grossman, the boss of the organization. Now, I wonder
what he did...

"Andrew Grossman, former executive director of the Democratic Senatorial
Campaign Committee, is the executive director at walmar****ch.com, and says
his personal motivation for being such is to, “change the way large
businesses interact with people.” Grossman says he hopes the website will
be, “a resource base anyone can use,” and will provide people will tools to
help be more effective in changing the business ethics of corporations such
as Wal-Mart"

You've picked a winner, Gene.

On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:33:04 -0400, HK wrote:

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:03:41 -0500, John H.
wrote:


Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and the
major media, because it won't unionize.

That is the only complaint that you have heard about walmart? Now, I
gotta issue a horse pucky alert!

Check out some of these non-union issues:
http://walmar****ch.com/issues/

Trust me, in the 22 states with right-to-work laws, walmart sucks just
as bad as they do elsewhere.



Poor simple-minded Herring. I suppose his is an example of what happens
to a low-level brain after a career in the military.

Harrie, you're such a neat guy. Thanks for your contribution. It's one of
your better ones!

On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:38:06 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:03:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:47:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
8...
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach
forth the following:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in
message
...
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach forth the following:

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in
message ...
In message , JoeSpareBedroom
sprach forth the following:

Would you agree that the 3 entities below have created public
impressions that are hard to change?

1) Wal Mart
2) Used car dealers
3) Law firms

Wal Mart has more customers than any business in the world.

Used car dealers don't make any money unless they attract
customers
either.

Lawyers are the primary contributors to Democrats.


You're not much of a dancer.

No, I demonstrated that you have contempt for success and
supplication
for the John Edwardses of the world.

You demonstrated that once again, you've danced around someone's
question because to answer it honestly, you'd step in quicksand.

Your question was an AVOIDANCE NON-ANSWER TO TO QUESTIONS I POSED.


No it was not. The point was that every business creates its image, or
as
Harry pointed out, earns it, for better or worse. The 3 in the list are
perfect examples. Wal Mart's got a miserable reputation with as many
people
as those who love the place. Used car dealers are seen as snakes, much
the
same as lawyers. You are fully aware of all this.

The major oil companies are no different. They offer us bull****
explanations for the price swings. If you kids gave you similar answers,
there would be consequences, assuming you were a competent parent.



Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and
the
major media, because it won't unionize.

I don't give a damn about their union situation. I'm talking about the
customer experience, and the fact they they lie about their prices, and
that
"made in America" charade.


In my experience, they lie about prices less than Safeway, and I've no
idea
what the 'made in America' charade is about. I think you've concocted
both.

You think I've concocted both because you don't read or get out much.


Much, if not most, of Wal Mart's stuff comes from China. Harry, the other
liberals, including yourself, seem to be in the forefront of finding
anything to help point fingers at Wal Mart.

My opinions are based 100% on my own experience with the store. I don't join
clubs. Harry has his own reasons.


It's all liberal smoke because they won't unionize.

Nope. Don't give a damn about their labor practices.


My advice - stay out of the store.

Also, you might make a contribution to the organization Gene mentioned.

On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:42:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:28:30 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:03:41 -0500, John H.
wrote:


Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and
the
major media, because it won't unionize.

That is the only complaint that you have heard about walmart? Now, I
gotta issue a horse pucky alert!

Check out some of these non-union issues:
http://walmar****ch.com/issues/

Trust me, in the 22 states with right-to-work laws, walmart sucks just
as bad as they do elsewhere.



Oh my gosh! A purely non biased organization whose sole function is to
keep an eye on Wal Mart? Wow, I wonder who funds it.


The exact same information has also been in the newspaper your wife reads,
and then places under your easy chair to catch the mess.


Now why would you resort to personal attacks?

On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:47:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:42:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:28:30 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:03:41 -0500, John H.
wrote:


Horse pucky. Wal Mart has been a target of the liberals, like Harry and
the
major media, because it won't unionize.

That is the only complaint that you have heard about walmart? Now, I
gotta issue a horse pucky alert!

Check out some of these non-union issues:
http://walmar****ch.com/issues/

Trust me, in the 22 states with right-to-work laws, walmart sucks just
as bad as they do elsewhere.



Oh my gosh! A purely non biased organization whose sole function is to
keep an eye on Wal Mart? Wow, I wonder who funds it.


The exact same information has also been in the newspaper your wife reads,
and then places under your easy chair to catch the mess.


Now why would you resort to personal attacks?

Probably for the same reason you do. When the soap opera pauses for a
commercial, think about it.


I suppose if I felt backed into a corner I may do the same.