Gene Kearns wrote:
On 01 Jun 2007 14:22:10 GMT, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:

In message , Gene Kearns
sprach forth the following:

On 01 Jun 2007 13:42:33 GMT, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:

In message hlink.net,
NOYB sprach forth the following:

This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx
Encourage your elected representatives to support HR 2550, the
Recreational Boating Act of 2007.

Here is the Act:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c110qDJssC::
Now, isn't this a confusion! Do you really want to support a bill
sponsored by one of them "liebral democrats?"
GovTrack puts his ideology right-of-center. This took me TWO SECONDS to
find, dumbass.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400399

ROFLMAO.... you are such a piece of work! I had already looked at that
before I posted and discounted it as unsupported!

So.... let's look at your source of information. A political website
run by a pedant working toward a degree in Linguistics.... a guy that
feels that "I've always been a little troubled by the fact that I
exist. "
http://razor.occams.info/

However, assuming that he *does* exist, should I adopt his opinion of
" right-of-center" as my own opinion? Sorry, Fred Garvin, Male
Prostitute-of-Borg, I don't let other people do my thinking for me.

Dr. Kervorkian is out of the slam. Maybe he can put Fred out of our misery.

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of the
NMMA.




Thanks. I figured it wasn't anyone who really understood the legislative
or legal systems. It was too Chicken-Little-ish.

Sometimes you have to go a little over the top to get people to act, because
people by nature only react to histrionics.


Just look at the Global Warming hysteria.

NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of the
NMMA.



Thanks. I figured it wasn't anyone who really understood the legislative
or legal systems. It was too Chicken-Little-ish.

Sometimes you have to go a little over the top to get people to act, because
people by nature only react to histrionics.


Just look at the Global Warming hysteria.






None of the sources I consider are hysterical about global warming.
Perhaps you need to consider sources that are not the equivalents of
reich-wing radio.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else.
Who is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any
special interests.


If you sue someone, YOU are the special interest. What's the opposite of
"be beholden"? Make up these ideas themselves?

Courts shouldn't allow frivolous suits to proceed that attempt to circumvent
the legislative process and create legislation from the bench.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 1, 7:31?am, "NOYB" wrote:
"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in
. 128...





In messagenews:36a0631mkhsn8np0js1un0nvk75bad2n6c@4ax .com, Gene Kearns
sprach forth the following:

On 01 Jun 2007 13:42:33 GMT, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:

In as.earthlink.net,
NOYB sprach forth the following:

This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx

Encourage your elected representatives to support HR 2550, the
Recreational Boating Act of 2007.

Here is the Act:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c110qDJssC::

Now, isn't this a confusion! Do you really want to support a bill
sponsored by one of them "liebral democrats?"

GovTrack puts his ideology right-of-center. This took me TWO SECONDS to
find, dumbass.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400399

And the co-sponsor is a Republican from Michigan.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you saying you wouldn't support a bill that's good for boating if
it were only sponsored by a Democrat (possibly not judged by some
rating service to be right of center) and not co-sponsored by a
Republican?

If so, that's pretty dogmatic.

No. I'm saying that a LIBERAL Democrat would never put forth a bill that
protects boater's rights over the wishes of a wacko environmentalist group.

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of
the NMMA.



Thanks. I figured it wasn't anyone who really understood the legislative
or legal systems. It was too Chicken-Little-ish.

Sometimes you have to go a little over the top to get people to act,
because people by nature only react to histrionics.


Just look at the Global Warming hysteria.






None of the sources I consider are hysterical about global warming.

LOL. algore's Hollywood production wasn't hysterical?

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
...
In message ups.com,
Chuck
Gould sprach forth the following:

Where ya been?

Repost from last March.........

The legislation (HR 2550) was just introduced last week.

There's not much you can do about anything while it's in the court system.
And until the court made the silly ruling that it did, there was no need for
the legislative branch to act. Now there is.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of
the NMMA.



Thanks. I figured it wasn't anyone who really understood the
legislative or legal systems. It was too Chicken-Little-ish.

Sometimes you have to go a little over the top to get people to act,
because people by nature only react to histrionics.


Just look at the Global Warming hysteria.






None of the sources I consider are hysterical about global warming.

LOL. algore's Hollywood production wasn't hysterical?


Since that's the only source you're familiar with, it stands to reason you
would mention it over and over and over and over......

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

Courts shouldn't allow frivolous suits to proceed that attempt to
circumvent the legislative process and create legislation from the bench.


Someone has to keep the sleezy self-serving politicians in check......and
don't say the people will serve justice on the next election.
twiddle dee...twiddle dum.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of
the NMMA.



Thanks. I figured it wasn't anyone who really understood the
legislative or legal systems. It was too Chicken-Little-ish.
Sometimes you have to go a little over the top to get people to act,
because people by nature only react to histrionics.


Just look at the Global Warming hysteria.





None of the sources I consider are hysterical about global warming.
LOL. algore's Hollywood production wasn't hysterical?


Since that's the only source you're familiar with, it stands to reason you
would mention it over and over and over and over......




I haven't seen Gore's film.