Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By this statement, I should be able, as a passenger in a car, to hoist
my open can of brew in a salute to the Fuzz in the next lane. Care to estimate how long it would take for him to hit the skids, and swoop in on the 6 O'clock for the kill? I'm not sure you know it, but there IS an open container law here in Washington. Please explain the legal difference between a boat and a car in this scenario. JR Chuck Gould wrote: but even if it's borderline unwise a non-operating adult shouldn't be ticketed for holding a can of beer on a boat. -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, many state parks and public beaches have "No Alcoholic Beverages
Allowed" signs all over the place. I put Coca-Coca and Dr. Pepper in the cooler when I go to those places. After all, it would be embarrassing to be arrested by a lifeguard. It wouldn't be a lifeguard arresting you. If they are like Minnesota, the state parks and larger park systems have their own police officers and the others can bring in the local authorities quickly. However, they have better things to do than bust people for alcohol unless they are causing a problem. While on a camping trip at a state park, we had a group site (secluded, away from the main sites). We went for a late night hike and talked with a state park ranger along the way. He casually asked if we had any alcohol, then said that if we did, we shouldn't carry it around (we wouldn't anyway) or be overly loud. I volunteer with a local (Three Rivers Park District) park district. The "park patrol" is around for information and first aid. After appropriate training, we use the trails (skate, bike, hike, ski) and watch for people who need assistance. Usually it is just to help people figure out where they are or where something is. However, if we see a problem, we will call the dispatcher for the park police. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 8:59?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote: On Jul 8, 5:11?am, HK wrote: Garrison Hilliard wrote: 200 People Busted For Alcohol-Related Offenses On The Little Miami River Last Update: Jul 8, 2007 2:26 AM Close to 200 people fall victim to a sweep on the Little Miami River. Officials in Warren County were targeting alcohol-related offenses, from open containers to underage drinking. The operation left many people drying out and forced to pay a hefty fine. Many people were feeling the heat, and not because of the temperature. The main objective of this operation is not to ruin activities but to make sure the Little Miami River can be a fun place for the whole family. Out of sight and undercover, officers from several agencies were looking to put a stop to a common problem. There's a little too much drinking on the Little Miami River. Area residents living around the river complained of rude and obnoxious behavior, enough that something had to be done. The Sackriders, a local family, agree with Warren County officials who say alcohol and the river don't mix. Most were upset to get ticketed, in over a few hours authorities handed citations close to 200 people. The violations ranged from underage drinking to littering and life jacket violations. Some people on canoes got stopped more than once for the most popular offense, having an open container. The goal of the crackdown is to make sure the river is a friendly place for local families to make a splash. Dozens of empty beer cans were picked up in the seven-hour sweep Meanwhile, on the water Chris and Rebecca Sackrider will stick to drinking water. There will be another similar sweep in the near future, but officials in Warren County are not saying when. http://www.local12.com/mostpopular/s...d=2ccdfc37-1f6... Works for me. Drunks on the water are damned dangerous.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Subtle distinction: The government sweep didn't target drunks, the tickets were handed out to people caught with an open bottle of beer in a boat. If it's 100 degrees, 3-4 guys are out fishing, and somebody other than the person operating the vessel pops open a beer that shouldn't be considered a crime. It may be unwise, but if the boat operator isn't drinking at the helm it's merely a questionable practice and not a crime. IMO. There's a difference between having a beer on a summer afternoon and being a "drunk". I thought Carrie Nation and Temperance Unions were ancient history. Good thing they didn't catch one of the canoeists or kayakers smokin a doobie.....if beer warrants a ticket those uptight puritans would probably lynch somebody found with a joint. No wonder the entire world seems to be moving to the west coast! :-) You can't drive a car on the highways legally with an open container of booze. I doubt you could ride a bike doing so, either. But driving a boat with open containers of booze visible is ok?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There are some important differences between cars and boats. In most states it's also illegal to operate your car unless everybody is in a seat belt and normally a shoulder harness. Would you propose a similar restriction for boats? A car is nothing more than vehicle of conveyance, while a boat can be simultaneously a conveyance and a means of accommodation. I don't suggest the skipper should be drinking underway, but busting the skipper seated up on the flybridge because a guest down in the salon is having a cold beer or a glass of Merlot on a summer afternoon is way over the top. Good thing there's no actual crime in Ohio, thereby freeing 45 of the local cops to spend an afternoon preventing the consumption of beer on the Little Miami river. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 9:17?am, John Kuthe wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:07 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Jul 8, 5:11?am, HK wrote: Garrison Hilliard wrote: 200 People Busted For Alcohol-Related Offenses On The Little Miami River Last Update: Jul 8, 2007 2:26 AM Close to 200 people fall victim to a sweep on the Little Miami River. Officials in Warren County were targeting alcohol-related offenses, from open containers to underage drinking. The operation left many people drying out and forced to pay a hefty fine. Many people were feeling the heat, and not because of the temperature. The main objective of this operation is not to ruin activities but to make sure the Little Miami River can be a fun place for the whole family. Out of sight and undercover, officers from several agencies were looking to put a stop to a common problem. There's a little too much drinking on the Little Miami River. Area residents living around the river complained of rude and obnoxious behavior, enough that something had to be done. The Sackriders, a local family, agree with Warren County officials who say alcohol and the river don't mix. Most were upset to get ticketed, in over a few hours authorities handed citations close to 200 people. The violations ranged from underage drinking to littering and life jacket violations. Some people on canoes got stopped more than once for the most popular offense, having an open container. The goal of the crackdown is to make sure the river is a friendly place for local families to make a splash. Dozens of empty beer cans were picked up in the seven-hour sweep Meanwhile, on the water Chris and Rebecca Sackrider will stick to drinking water. There will be another similar sweep in the near future, but officials in Warren County are not saying when. http://www.local12.com/mostpopular/s...d=2ccdfc37-1f6... Works for me. Drunks on the water are damned dangerous.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Subtle distinction: The government sweep didn't target drunks, the tickets were handed out to people caught with an open bottle of beer in a boat. If it's 100 degrees, 3-4 guys are out fishing, and somebody other than the person operating the vessel pops open a beer that shouldn't be considered a crime. It may be unwise, but if the boat operator isn't drinking at the helm it's merely a questionable practice and not a crime. IMO. There's a difference between having a beer on a summer afternoon and being a "drunk". I thought Carrie Nation and Temperance Unions were ancient history. Good thing they didn't catch one of the canoeists or kayakers smokin a doobie.....if beer warrants a ticket those uptight puritans would probably lynch somebody found with a joint. No wonder the entire world seems to be moving to the west coast! :-) You can't drive a car on the highways legally with an open container of booze. I doubt you could ride a bike doing so, either. But driving a boat with open containers of booze visible is ok? I have heard you say many times, that you have had a beer on a boat on hot summer day, and that you allow others to drink on your boat, you just don't allow them to get drunk. Is that ok with you? People (not an individual person) often get irresponsible and out of control when alcohol is involved. I've seen it ruin many a perfectly good, responsible and happy a festive time where many individuals are enjoying alcohol responsibly. People SUCK! Remember? We see many instances of this sucky behavior all the time. Many instances involve alcohol too, unfortunately. Ruins the good responsible time for the rest of us, yano? :-( John Kuthe...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So in my opinion we should target the problem people, not a common behavior in which (as you note) many will participate with voluntary and responsible restraint. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jul 8, 8:59?am, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Jul 8, 5:11?am, HK wrote: Garrison Hilliard wrote: 200 People Busted For Alcohol-Related Offenses On The Little Miami River Last Update: Jul 8, 2007 2:26 AM Close to 200 people fall victim to a sweep on the Little Miami River. Officials in Warren County were targeting alcohol-related offenses, from open containers to underage drinking. The operation left many people drying out and forced to pay a hefty fine. Many people were feeling the heat, and not because of the temperature. The main objective of this operation is not to ruin activities but to make sure the Little Miami River can be a fun place for the whole family. Out of sight and undercover, officers from several agencies were looking to put a stop to a common problem. There's a little too much drinking on the Little Miami River. Area residents living around the river complained of rude and obnoxious behavior, enough that something had to be done. The Sackriders, a local family, agree with Warren County officials who say alcohol and the river don't mix. Most were upset to get ticketed, in over a few hours authorities handed citations close to 200 people. The violations ranged from underage drinking to littering and life jacket violations. Some people on canoes got stopped more than once for the most popular offense, having an open container. The goal of the crackdown is to make sure the river is a friendly place for local families to make a splash. Dozens of empty beer cans were picked up in the seven-hour sweep Meanwhile, on the water Chris and Rebecca Sackrider will stick to drinking water. There will be another similar sweep in the near future, but officials in Warren County are not saying when. http://www.local12.com/mostpopular/s...d=2ccdfc37-1f6... Works for me. Drunks on the water are damned dangerous.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Subtle distinction: The government sweep didn't target drunks, the tickets were handed out to people caught with an open bottle of beer in a boat. If it's 100 degrees, 3-4 guys are out fishing, and somebody other than the person operating the vessel pops open a beer that shouldn't be considered a crime. It may be unwise, but if the boat operator isn't drinking at the helm it's merely a questionable practice and not a crime. IMO. There's a difference between having a beer on a summer afternoon and being a "drunk". I thought Carrie Nation and Temperance Unions were ancient history. Good thing they didn't catch one of the canoeists or kayakers smokin a doobie.....if beer warrants a ticket those uptight puritans would probably lynch somebody found with a joint. No wonder the entire world seems to be moving to the west coast! :-) You can't drive a car on the highways legally with an open container of booze. I doubt you could ride a bike doing so, either. But driving a boat with open containers of booze visible is ok?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There are some important differences between cars and boats. In most states it's also illegal to operate your car unless everybody is in a seat belt and normally a shoulder harness. Would you propose a similar restriction for boats? A car is nothing more than vehicle of conveyance, while a boat can be simultaneously a conveyance and a means of accommodation. I don't suggest the skipper should be drinking underway, but busting the skipper seated up on the flybridge because a guest down in the salon is having a cold beer or a glass of Merlot on a summer afternoon is way over the top. Good thing there's no actual crime in Ohio, thereby freeing 45 of the local cops to spend an afternoon preventing the consumption of beer on the Little Miami river. I don't spend a lot of time thinking about booze and boats, Chuck. So far this year, I've had two beers, and both were consumed in my den after spending four hours mowing my lawn and field. I have one friend who is an alcoholic. When he comes aboard, I restrict his cooler to two beers. Maybe once or twice a year, I have a beer on board, but only while anchored or in a slip. I don't believe the case you cited involved drinking a glass of wine in the salon. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 10:06?am, Tim wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:52 am, "Jim" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message roups.com... | On Jul 8, 5:11?am, HK wrote: | Garrison Hilliard wrote: | 200 People Busted For Alcohol-Related Offenses On The Little Miami River | Last Update: Jul 8, 2007 2:26 AM | | Close to 200 people fall victim to a sweep on the Little Miami River. Officials | in Warren County were targeting alcohol-related offenses, from open containers | to underage drinking. The operation left many people drying out and forced to | pay a hefty fine. | | Many people were feeling the heat, and not because of the temperature. The main | objective of this operation is not to ruin activities but to make sure the | Little Miami River can be a fun place for the whole family. | | Out of sight and undercover, officers from several agencies were looking to put | a stop to a common problem. There's a little too much drinking on the Little | Miami River. Area residents living around the river complained of rude and | obnoxious behavior, enough that something had to be done. | | The Sackriders, a local family, agree with Warren County officials who say | alcohol and the river don't mix. Most were upset to get ticketed, in over a few | hours authorities handed citations close to 200 people. | | The violations ranged from underage drinking to littering and life jacket | violations. Some people on canoes got stopped more than once for the most | popular offense, having an open container. The goal of the crackdown is to make | sure the river is a friendly place for local families to make a splash. Dozens | of empty beer cans were picked up in the seven-hour sweep | | Meanwhile, on the water Chris and Rebecca Sackrider will stick to drinking | water. There will be another similar sweep in the near future, but officials in | Warren County are not saying when. | | http://www.local12.com/mostpopular/s...d=2ccdfc37-1f6... | | Works for me. Drunks on the water are damned dangerous.- Hide quoted text - | | - Show quoted text - | | Subtle distinction: The government sweep didn't target drunks, the | tickets were handed out to people caught with an open bottle of beer | in a boat. If it's 100 degrees, 3-4 guys are out fishing, and somebody | other than the person operating the vessel pops open a beer that | shouldn't be considered a crime. It may be unwise, but if the boat | operator isn't drinking at the helm it's merely a questionable | practice and not a crime. IMO. | | There's a difference between having a beer on a summer afternoon and | being a "drunk". | | I thought Carrie Nation and Temperance Unions were ancient history. | Good thing they didn't catch one of the canoeists or kayakers smokin a | doobie.....if beer warrants a ticket those uptight puritans would | probably lynch somebody found with a joint. | | No wonder the entire world seems to be moving to the west coast! :-) What the hell is a doobie? Is it one of those new designer drugs? Does it give you the feeling that Kansas and Nebraska are closing in on the left coast. Good to see you a little closer to the fusilage than ol' HK, at least on this issue. There may be redemption for you yet. | All in all, I don't allow any alcoholic beverages on my boat. Most of my friends don't drink, and the ones that do don't give me any hassle about my "rule". And it should indeed be the skipper's privilege to formulate an alcohol policy for his or her boat. And it would be for the best if more boaters had a policy similar to yours......but should it be a *crime* to allow a guest to enjoy a beer while underway? I think not. Carylyle Lake does a pretty good sweep a couple times a year too. They don't get wild about "open seal" though, but when none of the boats occupants can pass the breath blower, then things get interesting. And it does happen.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 12:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 08:47:28 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: There's a difference between having a beer on a summer afternoon and being a "drunk". It's a little more complicated than that. The combination of alcohol and sun can lead to dehydration - even one can cause the effect if one hasn't taken precautions by drinking non-caffinated beverages like water or a sports drink. Even one 12 ounce can of beer can do the trick - in particular if somebody hasn't eaten or had some water along the way. If you are just sitting on your house deck, drinking a beer and eating a burger, that's not going to create a problem as such. On a boat, that's a whole different story. Movement, wind, the accelerated dual effect of direct sun and reflected sun can dehydrate you in short order. Add 12 ounces of beer, it's possible that you can have or be a problem in short order. The sad thing is you won't even know it until it happens. All of a sudden, exhaustion sets in. A cold beer sounds gppd and the effect in compounded. When I was active with the local Vollies, I've seen it happen a number of times on local lakes - I only had one beer. Never doubted it for a second. :) I thought Carrie Nation and Temperance Unions were ancient history. Good thing they didn't catch one of the canoeists or kayakers smokin a doobie.....if beer warrants a ticket those uptight puritans would probably lynch somebody found with a joint. Not the issue and I'm surprised that you would make such a statement. An open container law bans an open container of alcohol in the passenger compartment of a vehicle and/or boat. The goal is to stop people from drinking and driving, it almost goes without saying that an open container law should stop people from drinking WHILE driving. And that's really the issue - drinking while driving and boating. No wonder the entire world seems to be moving to the west coast! :-) You ought to check our own state's Open Container law then because it's one of the more drastic ones in terms of fines and effects. I agree that it's questionable to allow people to drink on board, but there's a sliding scale of risk that effectively decreases as the size of the boat increases. Those large charter and sightseeing boats run non-stop bars. Booze was easily available on our recent cruise ship vacation 24 hours a day. 2400 passengers, most of them drinking at least a little bit every day for a week straight and some almost non- stop, and not a single incident where the safety of the vessel was compromised or the risk of going overboard was dramatically increased. I offer again my example from earlier in this thread. Joe Doaks has a party of guests out for an afternoon cruise. Joe isn't drinking, and in fact he's piloting the boat from the flybridge. Down below in the salon, Mrs. Doaks is serving Margaritas to a couple guests of legal drinking age. Is Joe Doaks a criminal? Should he be hauled into court and made to answer for his behavior? In many states, certain boating offenses cross reference to your vehicular driving license, so should stone sober Joe's car insurance be cancelled or his premiums be doubled because somebody else on his boat (well out of reach of the skipper) had an alcoholic beverage? Last year at our Seafair hydroplane races the Seattle cops did one of these mass arrest deals. They had to rent portable jails to lock up everybody they were processing. The difference was, the Seattle cops where targeting people exhibiting drunken behavior (not merely people who might be having a beer while watching the hydroplane races). The Seattle cops also focused on underage drinkers. I've always like the European approach to alcohol. In many societies it's common to serve beer to school kids, and entire families often enjoy a drink together. The difference is that becoming publicly intoxicated is a very serious screw up, and getting caught DWI will typically result in very serious punishment even for "first offenders". |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Corsair23" wrote in message
ups.com... I agree, NO BOOZE...times have changed. That's just law enforcement grandstanding to "appear" they are doing something... gee? Who put out the press release??? heh Silly sheeple. Last night we had we had a "fireworks party" out at the T41 "Beer Can Island". It took me 13 minutes to get there on plane at 7pm.... it took me 1.5 hours to get home trolling at 1200 rpm at 12:30AM with a BAC of between .08 and .10. I'm *very* hesitant to plane the boat out at night in the dark anyway, because I'm afraid some drunk fisherman will have his lights off. But I never **EVER** go above troll if drinking. For one thing, the marine patroll doesn't bother inobtrusive trolling people... and further it's just not safe... and yes I wore my PFD to pee off the swim platform - just in case. ![]() I'm very aware and very sensitive to drunk boaters - my cousin was (famously) killed by one in NH on a Memorial Day weekend. But that *doesn't* mean my sence of right and wrong change with the wind of public opinion. A drinking boater or a canoe at NO speed can't really hurt a fly. The possible exception being *themselves* if they fall in the water and drown... and I don't want Big Brother Nanny interfering with good old fashioned Darwinism. ![]() I have no problem with little boats (and pontoons) running at "headway speed" with a load of beer and good old boys with fishing poles aboard. HOWEVER... I'm all for throwing the book at BUI's up on plane. All the Marine Patroll has to do is look for "strange behavior" in order to get the real assholes off the water. Not some bull**** PR stunt, a "sweep" like that is waste or resources and money. (but it looks good in print) Personally... after the last few days... I think the flaming idiots who run a tube side to side in the travel channels are the worst problem. I've had **way** too many chances to contribute to Darwinism by running thier sniveling offspring on a rope over. I'll take a **trolling** drunk any day over those child endangering assholes. -W W: Charlie.... kill the stereo and start the motor. please. C: WHY??? W: Because I see a boat comeing up way too fast for 3AM, and I'm afraid he's even drunker than we are (if that's even humanly possible). I just wanna be ready to get TF out of his way if he's too blind to see our anchor light. You can kill it again when he's gone by us.... |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:18:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Harry, Why have you decided to change your name from Harry Krause to HK? Did you decried it does make sense to follow the advice of internet security experts and use a handle instead of your name? Reginald, Why do you insist on reposting every single bit of previous drivel instead of snipping to something half way relevant? |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 12:53:32 -0400, animal05
wrote: Harry, as usual is incorrect, there are states that it is still legal to do so http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...container_laws Note that the federal guidelines apply to: 1. Motor vehicles 2. Vehicles on a public highway or the right-of-way (i.e. on the shoulder) of a public highway |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Saturday's a special day for the Little Miami River | General | |||
OT--9/11 Commission Suppressed the Evidence. | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |