Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? I don't know that I would characterize it as a big deal, but I did elect to keep the service. XM was on my truck when I bought it. I thought that I would probably not use the service and let the free 90 day subscription lapse. I ended up listening so much that I kept the service and later changed to Sirius. There is programming to fit anyone's tastes..... talk left, talk right, 60's, 70', 80's, dance, reggae, jazz, classical, NPR, country, comedy, and even Playboy.... Like John noted, if you are traveling, you don't lose the signal. I don't really care for the iPOD thing.... and as for being a DJ, listening to Margaritaville, I have heard more neat music by composers and artists with whom I was unfamiliar to justify the expense. There is a Sirius Internet portal that I have piped from my computer through my old amplifier onto my deck..... a good book, an ice bucket stocked with Red Stripe, salt air, and Margaritaville sounds....... ah..... the life! And Howard Stern? I just don't get it..... Sirius should ask for their money back.... his program just sucks..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? I don't know that I would characterize it as a big deal, but I did elect to keep the service. XM was on my truck when I bought it. I thought that I would probably not use the service and let the free 90 day subscription lapse. I ended up listening so much that I kept the service and later changed to Sirius. There is programming to fit anyone's tastes..... talk left, talk right, 60's, 70', 80's, dance, reggae, jazz, classical, NPR, country, comedy, and even Playboy.... Like John noted, if you are traveling, you don't lose the signal. I don't really care for the iPOD thing.... and as for being a DJ, listening to Margaritaville, I have heard more neat music by composers and artists with whom I was unfamiliar to justify the expense. There is a Sirius Internet portal that I have piped from my computer through my old amplifier onto my deck..... a good book, an ice bucket stocked with Red Stripe, salt air, and Margaritaville sounds....... ah..... the life! And Howard Stern? I just don't get it..... Sirius should ask for their money back.... his program just sucks..... Hmm. I like Red Stripe, too. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message . .. Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? I don't know that I would characterize it as a big deal, but I did elect to keep the service. XM was on my truck when I bought it. I thought that I would probably not use the service and let the free 90 day subscription lapse. I ended up listening so much that I kept the service and later changed to Sirius. There is programming to fit anyone's tastes..... talk left, talk right, 60's, 70', 80's, dance, reggae, jazz, classical, NPR, country, comedy, and even Playboy.... Like John noted, if you are traveling, you don't lose the signal. I don't really care for the iPOD thing.... and as for being a DJ, listening to Margaritaville, I have heard more neat music by composers and artists with whom I was unfamiliar to justify the expense. There is a Sirius Internet portal that I have piped from my computer through my old amplifier onto my deck..... a good book, an ice bucket stocked with Red Stripe, salt air, and Margaritaville sounds....... ah..... the life! And Howard Stern? I just don't get it..... Sirius should ask for their money back.... his program just sucks..... Hmm. I like Red Stripe, too. I missed most of this thread, but will offer the following experience with Sirius: I bought a mobile unit for our vehicle back when we were doing the Florida thing during the winter. I ended up hooking it up to the music system in the pool cabaña at our house here (using a DC power supply) where the antenna is now stationary. Works fine for our occasional summer pool parties, but I noticed that the signal drops out everyday at the same time for about a half hour in the late afternoon and then recovers. I suspect it's due to a poor combination of the locations of the Sirius satellites that repeats everyday. Eisboch |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? I don't know that I would characterize it as a big deal, but I did elect to keep the service. XM was on my truck when I bought it. I thought that I would probably not use the service and let the free 90 day subscription lapse. I ended up listening so much that I kept the service and later changed to Sirius. There is programming to fit anyone's tastes..... talk left, talk right, 60's, 70', 80's, dance, reggae, jazz, classical, NPR, country, comedy, and even Playboy.... Like John noted, if you are traveling, you don't lose the signal. I don't really care for the iPOD thing.... and as for being a DJ, listening to Margaritaville, I have heard more neat music by composers and artists with whom I was unfamiliar to justify the expense. There is a Sirius Internet portal that I have piped from my computer through my old amplifier onto my deck..... a good book, an ice bucket stocked with Red Stripe, salt air, and Margaritaville sounds....... ah..... the life! You be Jammin Mon? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:45:04 -0400, Eisboch penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: I missed most of this thread, but will offer the following experience with Sirius: I bought a mobile unit for our vehicle back when we were doing the Florida thing during the winter. I ended up hooking it up to the music system in the pool cabaña at our house here (using a DC power supply) where the antenna is now stationary. Works fine for our occasional summer pool parties, but I noticed that the signal drops out everyday at the same time for about a half hour in the late afternoon and then recovers. I suspect it's due to a poor combination of the locations of the Sirius satellites that repeats everyday. I've noticed that both XM and Sirius will lose the signal in some open areas. It appears that some sort of EMF causes it.... usually from overhead wires that I suspect carry data.... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:37:34 -0400, Jim penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? I don't know that I would characterize it as a big deal, but I did elect to keep the service. XM was on my truck when I bought it. I thought that I would probably not use the service and let the free 90 day subscription lapse. I ended up listening so much that I kept the service and later changed to Sirius. There is programming to fit anyone's tastes..... talk left, talk right, 60's, 70', 80's, dance, reggae, jazz, classical, NPR, country, comedy, and even Playboy.... Like John noted, if you are traveling, you don't lose the signal. I don't really care for the iPOD thing.... and as for being a DJ, listening to Margaritaville, I have heard more neat music by composers and artists with whom I was unfamiliar to justify the expense. There is a Sirius Internet portal that I have piped from my computer through my old amplifier onto my deck..... a good book, an ice bucket stocked with Red Stripe, salt air, and Margaritaville sounds....... ah..... the life! You be Jammin Mon? A true, yuut, a true..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 2:42 pm, HK wrote:
John H. wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? It is nice, when on a trip out of the area, to be able to listen to what you want without having to search for new channels every seventy miles. That's the advantage of XM. If I want to listen to 60's music, or Air America for 350 miles non-stop, I can do so. Without XM, I can't. Aha. But with my ipod, I'm my own DJ.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I agree. When on a trip, I actually like to wade through stations to see what I can get. Especially AM at night when there is skip. Kind of like shortwave radio! |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 7:05 pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:18:42 -0400, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:42:36 -0400, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? It is nice, when on a trip out of the area, to be able to listen to what you want without having to search for new channels every seventy miles. That's the advantage of XM. If I want to listen to 60's music, or Air America for 350 miles non-stop, I can do so. Without XM, I can't. Aha. But with my ipod, I'm my own DJ. Air America doesn't get transmitted to your ipod. The 4Runner should arrive Thursday. Know anyone who wants a pickup? Got a hitch receiver? My 4Runner needed a receiver with a 2" drop for my Loadmaster trailers. It's coming with the tow package. I've not seen it yet, so I can't tell you what the package looks like.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My new truck has a two package, but didn't come with the ball, or the 2" drop, had to buy them. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 2:27 pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? It is nice, when on a trip out of the area, to be able to listen to what you want without having to search for new channels every seventy miles. That's the advantage of XM. If I want to listen to 60's music, or Air America for 350 miles non-stop, I can do so. Without XM, I can't.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You can listen to Air America for 350 miles???? |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:56:43 -0000, Tim wrote:
On Oct 1, 2:27 pm, John H. wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:29:10 -0400, HK wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:41:23 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: You have XM right? Curious about something. Have you noticed a decrease in satellite signal level recently - like, say, within the past month or so? I noticed this a while back, then saw that the FCC is going after Sirius and XM for power level infractions - both terresterial and space. Apparently, both HAD been exceeding their designated power output. Just curious. Just noticed my response didn't propagate...... Anyway.... I traded in XM for Sirius. XM always had a stronger signal Sirius. I don't think I have noticed any degradation in performance lately. I've noticed, on several receivers, that Sirius can be lost by going under a bridge..... (that *never* happened with XM) Everytime I visit a mall (not that often, thank goodness), there are pitchmen in kiosks selling XM or Sirius or whatever, and I am still trying to figure out why I would want to pay for this stuff. When I listen to radio, it is almost always an NPR affiliate with news or the kind of music I prefer, and if I really want to listen to only the music I like, I have my iPOD. Howard Stern is NOT on my list of "have to hears." So what's the big deal? It is nice, when on a trip out of the area, to be able to listen to what you want without having to search for new channels every seventy miles. That's the advantage of XM. If I want to listen to 60's music, or Air America for 350 miles non-stop, I can do so. Without XM, I can't.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You can listen to Air America for 350 miles???? I've actually got Air America loaded as one of my push button stations. I wanted to see why it was going out of business. Now I know. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
KREE!! Jaffa Kearns... | General | |||
Kree!! Jaffa Kearns!!! | General | |||
Kree!! Jaffa Kearns... | General | |||
Kree Jaffa Kearns... | General |