On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:





On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:

On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

egroups.com...

On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...

You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.

Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet

A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hmm, then why was your exact quote:
"Another substancless name caller. Can you explain to me how the
redistribution of wealth programs Hillary is pandering with lately,
are not socialist?? Or, you could just call me some names- "

Notice, please where *you* asked "Or you could just call me some
names". Again, I'll ask, what names have I called you? Unlike you, I
can converse with people about a given subject without having to
resort to that. Try it, you'll notice that you will instantly sound
more rational.

On Oct 15, 9:32 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote:





On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:

On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:

On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

egroups.com...

On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...

You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.

Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet

A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hmm, then why was your exact quote:
"Another substancless name caller. Can you explain to me how the
redistribution of wealth programs Hillary is pandering with lately,
are not socialist?? Or, you could just call me some names- "

Notice, please where *you* asked "Or you could just call me some
names". Again, I'll ask, what names have I called you? Unlike you, I
can converse with people about a given subject without having to
resort to that. Try it, you'll notice that you will instantly sound
more rational.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffffffffttt

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:30:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...


Why do you call out people for name calling when you do exactly the
same thing? You should practice what you preach.


If you have enough people who agree with you, you can get away with that
sort of thing. So, for example, he says I'm a liar. But, he has problems
backing up this accusation.


It's great to see a close friendship forming between two people who are so
much alike.

Congratulations!

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:25:02 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 14, 3:21 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:48:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

egroups.com...

On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...

You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.

Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet

A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL

He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why the name calling?

If you're talking to me, 'BoogerPicker' is just much easier to remember
than 'LoogerPicker'. Is one, in your opinion, worse than the other?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not necessarily, but as newsgroup sheriff, and one who always wants
people to quit such practices, it seems damned ironic that you don't
practice what you preach.

I stopped preaching. You can call all the names you want. I've been put in
my place for commenting on name-calling. I've been humbled, ostracized, and
many other unmentionable actions have been taken against me. Hell, I've
even been thrown in JimH's briar patch.

Every once in a while I'll have to pick a little booger though.