An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:
An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:38:20 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook

He's not progressive. He's Bassy. Never was progressive. And, he hasn't
changed his writing style one iota in his absence.

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Plane
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For Shirt
http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news...hirt/index.htm

Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirt
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05...f=mpstoryemail



It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb
everything they see.

On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?

On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.