Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo
Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac. I might be buying a new computer sooner than I normally do. This is an example of the articles I have read that have started me thinking about buying a Mac when it is time to upgrade: October 29, 2007 (Computerworld) -- Apple Inc.'s computers are the most reliable and its support the most dependable of five top vendors, a national chain of computer service shops said today. Macs beat machines built and sold by Lenovo Group Ltd., Hewlett-Packard Co., Gateway Inc. and Dell Inc., according to Rescuecom Corp.'s second annual reliability report. Apple, which took the second spot last year, blew away the competition this year by posting a score 51% higher than the next-best, Lenovo. To come up with its scores, Rescuecom compared the percentage of each company's support calls with its market share, said David Milman, Rescuecom's CEO. The greater the difference, the higher the score, and the better the hardware and follow-up OEM support. Apple, for example, received the highest score because Macs made up only 1.4% of all calls to Rescuecom, even though its estimated market share was 5% for the year. Dell machines, on the other hand, accounted for 34.5% of all Rescuecom's incoming calls, which was higher than the company's 32.3% market share. "It takes into account not just the quality and reliability of the equipment," said Milman, "but also the quality of service." The two are equally important, he said. "If a user is calling Rescuecom, that means they've abandoned the manufacturer's own support." Apple led the five vendors with a score of 347, followed by Lenovo/IBM (236), HP (126), Gateway (103) and Dell (94). "Apple's score tells me that it has both great quality control and great support in place," said Milman. "And that Apple is taking care of its customers though its internal support channel." Unlike the other four vendors, Apple has its own retail chain, whose stores are manned with customer support personnel, dubbed Apple Geniuses. Dell, on the other hand, is now at the bottom of Rescuecom's scoring system, having slipped from last year's fourth place to fifth this year. "Dell faces some challenges to deliver quality products and quality services," said Milman. "The probability is certainly higher that a customer will have problems with a Dell than with an HP or a Lenovo [computer]." The Round Rock, Tex. computer maker's has had problems meeting customer demand for some laptops, and has seen its once high-flying service and support reputation drop. In August, for instance, the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ASCI), a barometer of customer satisfaction produced at the University of Michigan, pegged Dell's score as down four points from the previous year. "Dell isn't going anywhere," said Milman. "They still have good machines. But over the long run, you're more likely to have a problem with Dell." In the same ASCI of August, Apple scored 79, the highest among the seven makers and/or computer lines, but like Dell, also down four points from 2006. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:24:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac I have 4 Gb and noticed the same thing. A video app I have is even slower, but comes right up on a Mac at Mrs. Wave's school machine. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac. I might be buying a new computer sooner than I normally do. Under 11 seconds for CS3 extended just now, with two both my web browers and news reader loaded. Seems fast enough to me for a PC. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:24:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac I have 4 Gb and noticed the same thing. A video app I have is even slower, but comes right up on a Mac at Mrs. Wave's school machine. I am thinking about reformatting my hard drive and reinstalling WinXP with just the software we currently run. My daughters have a tendency to download an install new software just to check it out. Windows does not do a good job completely uninstalling the software. I currently have both CS2 and CS3 on my computer. As soon as i can get my wife converted to CS3 I will do a new install and leave off CS2 and all the other junk that ends up on a computer used by teenagers. My wife absolutely hates to upgrade software, so I will have to walk her through the advantages of CS3. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac. I might be buying a new computer sooner than I normally do. Under 11 seconds for CS3 extended just now, with two both my web browers and news reader loaded. Seems fast enough to me for a PC. About 15 secs for CS3 the first time, but when I closed it to try it a second time, it opened in less than 5. Seems like there is a FNP Licensing Service program that takes awhile to check out everything when you first open the software, but it stays running in the background even after shutting Photoshop down. I think I paid about $1300 -$1500 for my off the shelf system about a year ago. I actually upgraded sound card and video card so I really not sure of the final cost, but it was in that range. It was around the same time you upgraded yours, what is the total cost on your custom job. The quick overview: Gateway GM5072 AMD Athlon 64X2 Dual Core 4200+ 2.21 GHZ 2.0 GB Ram |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac. I might be buying a new computer sooner than I normally do. Under 11 seconds for CS3 extended just now, with two both my web browers and news reader loaded. Seems fast enough to me for a PC. About 15 secs for CS3 the first time, but when I closed it to try it a second time, it opened in less than 5. Seems like there is a FNP Licensing Service program that takes awhile to check out everything when you first open the software, but it stays running in the background even after shutting Photoshop down. I think I paid about $1300 -$1500 for my off the shelf system about a year ago. I actually upgraded sound card and video card so I really not sure of the final cost, but it was in that range. It was around the same time you upgraded yours, what is the total cost on your custom job. The quick overview: Gateway GM5072 AMD Athlon 64X2 Dual Core 4200+ 2.21 GHZ 2.0 GB Ram Just under 2K. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:54:23 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:24:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac I have 4 Gb and noticed the same thing. A video app I have is even slower, but comes right up on a Mac at Mrs. Wave's school machine. I am thinking about reformatting my hard drive and reinstalling WinXP with just the software we currently run. My daughters have a tendency to download an install new software just to check it out. Windows does not do a good job completely uninstalling the software. I don't have that problem anymore. I don't play games on this computer, I regularly update and clean out the cookies and clean the registries every once in a while. I'm running the pro version of XP - whatever that is and I have enough processor speed and memory for just about anything. I bought the latest version of Photoshop CS3 Extended so I'm dealing with a higher end image processor - lots of stuff in there. Maybe that's the problem? I currently have both CS2 and CS3 on my computer. As soon as i can get my wife converted to CS3 I will do a new install and leave off CS2 and all the other junk that ends up on a computer used by teenagers. My wife absolutely hates to upgrade software, so I will have to walk her through the advantages of CS3. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac. I might be buying a new computer sooner than I normally do. Under 11 seconds for CS3 extended just now, with two both my web browers and news reader loaded. Seems fast enough to me for a PC. About 15 secs for CS3 the first time, but when I closed it to try it a second time, it opened in less than 5. Seems like there is a FNP Licensing Service program that takes awhile to check out everything when you first open the software, but it stays running in the background even after shutting Photoshop down. I think I paid about $1300 -$1500 for my off the shelf system about a year ago. I actually upgraded sound card and video card so I really not sure of the final cost, but it was in that range. It was around the same time you upgraded yours, what is the total cost on your custom job. The quick overview: Gateway GM5072 AMD Athlon 64X2 Dual Core 4200+ 2.21 GHZ 2.0 GB Ram Just under 2K. and what is the quick overview of the system. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:54:23 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:24:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac I have 4 Gb and noticed the same thing. A video app I have is even slower, but comes right up on a Mac at Mrs. Wave's school machine. I am thinking about reformatting my hard drive and reinstalling WinXP with just the software we currently run. My daughters have a tendency to download an install new software just to check it out. Windows does not do a good job completely uninstalling the software. I don't have that problem anymore. I don't play games on this computer, I regularly update and clean out the cookies and clean the registries every once in a while. I'm running the pro version of XP - whatever that is and I have enough processor speed and memory for just about anything. I used to give my kids the old computer whenever I purchased a new one. That way they could play games and would not screw up my machine. That didn't work because the old machine would not run the new games. I then started giving my old machine to my mother who only used it for email and the internet. She soon got tired of using an old computer and purchased a new low end model. I am now giving away my old machine to neighbors or a community center who gives them to kids who can't afford a computer. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 7:51 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:54:23 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:24:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: The reason I have started to think about this is I have a Win XP Duo Core processor with 2GB of Ram, and I am amazed at how slow Photoshop CS3 loads, especially when I compare the speed of Photoshop CS3 running on an older Mac I have 4 Gb and noticed the same thing. A video app I have is even slower, but comes right up on a Mac at Mrs. Wave's school machine. I am thinking about reformatting my hard drive and reinstalling WinXP with just the software we currently run. My daughters have a tendency to download an install new software just to check it out. Windows does not do a good job completely uninstalling the software. I don't have that problem anymore. I don't play games on this computer, I regularly update and clean out the cookies and clean the registries every once in a while. I'm running the pro version of XP - whatever that is and I have enough processor speed and memory for just about anything. I used to give my kids the old computer whenever I purchased a new one. That way they could play games and would not screw up my machine. That didn't work because the old machine would not run the new games. I then started giving my old machine to my mother who only used it for email and the internet. She soon got tired of using an old computer and purchased a new low end model. I am now giving away my old machine to neighbors or a community center who gives them to kids who can't afford a computer. I am considering giving away my new laptop with Vista and getting a Mac or buying an older second hand laptop with XP |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|