Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds. Those look like their all well under 10 pounds. John |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt John wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds. Those look like their all well under 10 pounds. John Heheheh. The point of the photo was not the fish. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". Especially if they are blue fin! But, maybe the guy knows what he's doing, he certainly knew to wear boots, and tuck his pants in them in case of following seas! |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HK" wrote in message
. .. Capt John wrote: On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds. Those look like their all well under 10 pounds. John Heheheh. The point of the photo was not the fish. I guess the point has changed. |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message . .. ...the right boat when you go fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg Mackerel? Those ain't mackeral. Eisboch |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message . .. ...the right boat when you go fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg Mackerel? Those ain't mackeral. Eisboch No, they are not. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". I want to know what the limit is on whatever the fish is. It definitely looked like it was over the limit. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Capt John wrote: On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds. Those look like their all well under 10 pounds. John Heheheh. The point of the photo was not the fish. What was the point, that the guy in the boat knew how to fish? Or that the kind of boat allowed you to catch more fish? If it is the later, that would make for one hell of a marketing campaign. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". Albacore. The secret is the long fins. Really small peanuts though. As to limits, up until this year there was no limit on the Pacific Coast of the US, but 5 in MX. Next year, 5 a day in SoCal and 25 a day in NorCal. More tuna fishing days in SoCal. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... HK wrote: Capt John wrote: On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote: On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote: ...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing. http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo of them. What do you think they are? Baby blue fin. Then again, maybe not. In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch". The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds. Those look like their all well under 10 pounds. John Heheheh. The point of the photo was not the fish. What was the point, that the guy in the boat knew how to fish? Or that the kind of boat allowed you to catch more fish? If it is the later, that would make for one hell of a marketing campaign. Actually the big diesel boats fish tuna better. They can carry mor scoops of livebait and the tuna seem to be attracted by the vibrations of the bigger boats. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hard Work Pays Off | Boat Building | |||
Who usually pays to put boat in water for trial - buyer or seller? | General | |||
GOP committee pays fine | General | |||
Diligence pays off... | General | |||
With no job who pays bobspirt ? | ASA |