Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 159
Default It pays to have...

On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote:
...the right boat when you go fishing.


http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg


If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.


What do you think they are?


Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".


The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their
probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing
we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds.
Those look like their all well under 10 pounds.

John

  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default It pays to have...

Capt John wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote:
...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing.
http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg
If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.
What do you think they are?

Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".


The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their
probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing
we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds.
Those look like their all well under 10 pounds.

John



Heheheh.

The point of the photo was not the fish.



  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,892
Default It pays to have...

On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote:
...the right boat when you go fishing.


http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg


If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.


What do you think they are?


Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".


Especially if they are blue fin! But, maybe the guy knows what he's
doing, he certainly knew to wear boots, and tuck his pants in them in
case of following seas!

  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,515
Default It pays to have...

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Capt John wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote:
...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing.
http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg
If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.
What do you think they are?
Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".


The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their
probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing
we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds.
Those look like their all well under 10 pounds.

John



Heheheh.

The point of the photo was not the fish.


I guess the point has changed.


  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default It pays to have...


"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
...the right boat when you go fishing.


http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg



Mackerel?


Those ain't mackeral.

Eisboch




  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default It pays to have...

Eisboch wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
...the right boat when you go fishing.


http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg


Mackerel?


Those ain't mackeral.

Eisboch



No, they are not.
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
Default It pays to have...

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote:
...the right boat when you go fishing.
http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg
If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.

What do you think they are?


Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".


I want to know what the limit is on whatever the fish is. It definitely
looked like it was over the limit.

  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
Default It pays to have...

HK wrote:
Capt John wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote:
...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing.
http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg
If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.
What do you think they are?
Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".


The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their
probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing
we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds.
Those look like their all well under 10 pounds.

John



Heheheh.

The point of the photo was not the fish.




What was the point, that the guy in the boat knew how to fish? Or that
the kind of boat allowed you to catch more fish? If it is the later,
that would make for one hell of a marketing campaign.

  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,728
Default It pays to have...


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK wrote:
...the right boat when you go fishing.

http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg

If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.


What do you think they are?


Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".


Albacore. The secret is the long fins. Really small peanuts though. As to
limits, up until this year there was no limit on the Pacific Coast of the
US, but 5 in MX. Next year, 5 a day in SoCal and 25 a day in NorCal. More
tuna fishing days in SoCal.


  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,728
Default It pays to have...


"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
Capt John wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:35 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:27:34 -0000, wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:00 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:26:14 -0500, HK
wrote:
...the right boat when you go bluewater fishing.
http://tinyurl.com/2t82wg
If those are what I think they are, I wouldn't be publishing a photo
of them.
What do you think they are?
Baby blue fin.

Then again, maybe not.

In either case, it's quite bothersome to see that kind of "catch".

The pertoral fins are too long for those to be Bluefins, their
probably Longfin Albacore. And their really small ones. I don't thing
we've ever kept one under 30 pounds, probably more like 40 pounds.
Those look like their all well under 10 pounds.

John



Heheheh.

The point of the photo was not the fish.




What was the point, that the guy in the boat knew how to fish? Or that
the kind of boat allowed you to catch more fish? If it is the later, that
would make for one hell of a marketing campaign.


Actually the big diesel boats fish tuna better. They can carry mor scoops
of livebait and the tuna seem to be attracted by the vibrations of the
bigger boats.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hard Work Pays Off mike worrall Boat Building 3 October 11th 04 11:36 PM
Who usually pays to put boat in water for trial - buyer or seller? vze3j5ge General 65 August 23rd 04 10:49 PM
GOP committee pays fine basskisser General 0 April 9th 04 08:58 PM
Diligence pays off... Netsock General 7 April 7th 04 09:02 PM
With no job who pays bobspirt ? Joe ASA 42 November 28th 03 06:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017