Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

To prove what?

It proves nothing, has no meaning and, frankly, it a useless exercise
because nothing is going to happen.

Of course it has meaning. You don't care that people lie to you? You
appear to be a nice guy but your moral compass is askew.

Kruase is amoral. He's told so many lies he can't keep track anymore.
Many of us have been here way longer than you and have had to listen to
his spew for years. Anyone who challenges his lies are met with his
incessant attacks to discredit them.

Stop defending lying, Tom.

-- Charlie

Charlie wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

To prove what?

It proves nothing, has no meaning and, frankly, it a useless exercise
because nothing is going to happen.

Of course it has meaning. You don't care that people lie to you? You
appear to be a nice guy but your moral compass is askew.

Kruase is amoral. He's told so many lies he can't keep track anymore.
Many of us have been here way longer than you and have had to listen to
his spew for years. Anyone who challenges his lies are met with his
incessant attacks to discredit them.

Stop defending lying, Tom.

-- Charlie

I didn't hear SWS say anything of the kind, what I heard him say the
topic was boring, and is a useless exercise, in the fact that all it
does does provoke more attacks. I think by this time everyone has made
up their mind as to the veracity of any of the regulars in rec.boats.

"Charlie" wrote in message
...


-- Charlie


Charlie of "Wavelength" fame, by any chance?

Eisboch

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:45:57 -0500, Charlie
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

To prove what?

It proves nothing, has no meaning and, frankly, it a useless exercise
because nothing is going to happen.

Of course it has meaning. You don't care that people lie to you? You
appear to be a nice guy but your moral compass is askew.

Kruase is amoral. He's told so many lies he can't keep track anymore.
Many of us have been here way longer than you and have had to listen to
his spew for years. Anyone who challenges his lies are met with his
incessant attacks to discredit them.

Stop defending lying, Tom.

And how were you harmed by it? Do you deal with Harry on a regular
basis - have a professional relationship that might be affected by
this - perhaps a personal relationship of some sort? Is an
exaggeration (done for whatever reason) committed for whatever reason
absolutely relevant to your life, health and happiness?

If it is, I feel really sorry for you because, dude, you need to get a
life. Worry about you and yours - it is much more productive.

Secondly, it's pretty freakin' boring.

On Nov 12, 6:45 pm, Charlie wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
To prove what?

It proves nothing, has no meaning and, frankly, it a useless exercise
because nothing is going to happen.

Of course it has meaning. You don't care that people lie to you? You
appear to be a nice guy but your moral compass is askew.

Kruase is amoral. He's told so many lies he can't keep track anymore.
Many of us have been here way longer than you and have had to listen to
his spew for years. Anyone who challenges his lies are met with his
incessant attacks to discredit them.

Stop defending lying, Tom.

-- Charlie

What you don't understand is that for Harry this is just folly, like
my kids on line in their virtual worlds. He may be a very honest
businessman, may not, but you will never know with what he gives you
here...

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


I didn't hear SWS say anything of the kind, what I heard him say the
topic was boring, and is a useless exercise, in the fact that all it
does does provoke more attacks.

SWS wants people who question krause about his lies to lay off.


I think by this time everyone has made
up their mind as to the veracity of any of the regulars in rec.boats.


There's people coming and going, and they need to be told that krause is
a liar. If I was looking for advice, I'd sure want to know if a
particular individual who dispenses advice was a known liar. Doesn't
mean everything he says is a lie, but hey, it could be.

You're the king of snide remarks, baiting questions and advice to
krause. Weird that you should get your panties in a bunch.

-- Charlie

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

And how were you harmed by it?

The measure of whether a lie is acceptable is not, 'were you harmed by
it?'. Lying is immoral.


Do you deal with Harry on a regular
basis - have a professional relationship that might be affected by
this - perhaps a personal relationship of some sort?

Thankfully, no. I never would. The man is a very sorry, pathetic man.
His persona is constructed with lies.


Is an
exaggeration (done for whatever reason) committed for whatever reason
absolutely relevant to your life, health and happiness?

It's a lie, not an "exaggeration". Nice try though. You came late to the
game and missed it.


If it is, I feel really sorry for you because, dude, you need to get a
life. Worry about you and yours - it is much more productive.

So, krause tells lies, gets called on them, gets reminded about them,
and you believe the problem lay with those who refuse to swallow his lies.

Now that's really screwed up thinking, "dude".


-- Charlie

On Nov 11, 3:31 pm, BAR wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:29:56 -0500, BAR penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

232 and still going strong.

Ever get to stay at Camp Lejeune 1957-1987?
http://www.starnewsonline.com/apps/p...=2007711110453...

No, I never had the pleasure of staying at Lejeune. I was at Cherry
Point and Bogue field quit a bit.

They told us that the radiation form the radar didn't focus its beam
until about 10 feet past where we were climbing up the stairs into the
ATC training hut. I was able to have two kids who turned out to be
smarter than most, they each currently have a 3.9 GPA.

Uh, yeah, sure, okay.......

Charlie wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


I didn't hear SWS say anything of the kind, what I heard him say the
topic was boring, and is a useless exercise, in the fact that all it
does does provoke more attacks.

SWS wants people who question krause about his lies to lay off.


I think by this time everyone has made up their mind as to the
veracity of any of the regulars in rec.boats.


There's people coming and going, and they need to be told that krause is
a liar. If I was looking for advice, I'd sure want to know if a
particular individual who dispenses advice was a known liar. Doesn't
mean everything he says is a lie, but hey, it could be.

You're the king of snide remarks, baiting questions and advice to
krause. Weird that you should get your panties in a bunch.

-- Charlie

No, I really don't care one way or another, I was just telling you the
way I interpreted what SWS said.

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:02:20 -0500, Charlie
wrote:

Now that's really screwed up thinking, "dude".

Get a life Charlie.