"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
...
On Nov 20, 8:10 pm, wrote:
On Nov 20, 9:01 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:

On Nov 20, 4:01?pm, "Don White" wrote:

In yesterdays local newspaper, I read an article about a Quebec
company that
has a plan to take dirty diapers destined for the landfill and turn
the
contents into a cost-effective synthetic diesel fuel. ?Estimate per
liter
cost of the finished product... 50 cents.
In this news group we have our own Diaper Dan who appears to be
sitting on a
fortune.
Judging by the volume of c*ap he slings here on a regular basis, I
imagine
he'd would be a perpetual motion machine on a diesel powered boat if
this
all comes to pass

What an unfortunate remark.

Only if taken seriously.. or, you could just mock it as I did C'mon
Chuck, you're clever, I bet you could be a real burner if you wanted
to;O

If Don's intent was to launch a personal attack thread, then my
characterization of "unfortunate" is applicable.

Three things intended...
bit of interesting info for diesel burners
to toss a bit of humour into the group
and yes... to aim a well deserved jab at Dan
I sure do wish you found his comments about my family just as 'unfortunate"!

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:17:10 -0500, Reginald Smithers III
wrote:

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Nov 20, 8:10 pm, wrote:
On Nov 20, 9:01 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:

On Nov 20, 4:01?pm, "Don White" wrote:
In yesterdays local newspaper, I read an article about a Quebec company that
has a plan to take dirty diapers destined for the landfill and turn the
contents into a cost-effective synthetic diesel fuel. ?Estimate per liter
cost of the finished product... 50 cents.
In this news group we have our own Diaper Dan who appears to be sitting on a
fortune.
Judging by the volume of c*ap he slings here on a regular basis, I imagine
he'd would be a perpetual motion machine on a diesel powered boat if this
all comes to pass
What an unfortunate remark.
Only if taken seriously.. or, you could just mock it as I did C'mon
Chuck, you're clever, I bet you could be a real burner if you wanted
to;O

If Don's intent was to launch a personal attack thread, then my
characterization of "unfortunate" is applicable.

Don was throwing one of his barbs at JohnH and Just was making a joke of it.

No, no, no. For once this was at someone else!

Don White wrote:


Three things intended...
bit of interesting info for diesel burners
to toss a bit of humour into the group
and yes... to aim a well deserved jab at Dan
I sure do wish you found his comments about my family just as 'unfortunate"!



Did I ever make a "comment" that wasn't 100% true, Donnie?

#1 I never made any blanket statements about your family.

#2 Anything I said about your son was true unless *you* posted bad
information.

Try again, Donnie but also try to be more accurate in your attacks. You
are very inconsistent at times.

-dk

"Dan" wrote in message
...

Did I ever make a "comment" that wasn't 100% true, Donnie?
snip usual crap..
-dk


Did you ever make a post that wasn't 100% disruptive to the group?

Don White wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Did I ever make a "comment" that wasn't 100% true, Donnie?
snip usual crap..
-dk


Did you ever make a post that wasn't 100% disruptive to the group?




Nice snip. I think I said:

Don White wrote:


Three things intended...
bit of interesting info for diesel burners
to toss a bit of humour into the group
and yes... to aim a well deserved jab at Dan
I sure do wish you found his comments about my family just as
'unfortunate"!



Did I ever make a "comment" that wasn't 100% true, Donnie?

#1 I never made any blanket statements about your family.

#2 Anything I said about your son was true unless *you* posted bad
information.

Try again, Donnie but also try to be more accurate in your attacks. You
are very inconsistent at times.

-dk


Try again, Donnie.

-dk