Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote:
JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:15:09 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: VOIP is a diaster waiting to happen There are some places, like the Bahamas, where it makes a lot of sense. WiFi internet is readily available there but the cost of making phone calls is very high. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 7:11 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:24:14 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: The power of competition is amazing. I have been using Vonage for a few years, and can not tell the difference between Vonage and BellSouth except for the lower price and substantially more features offered by Vonage. Today, I got an offer in the mail from AT&T offering VOIP and similar features at the same price as Vonage. As long as Vonage continues to provides excellent service, I will not change, but it is nice to see the market place working. VOIP is a diaster waiting to happen and when it does, all you VOIP losers...er...users are going to be stuck with no way to communicate. You heard it here first. What, I can't hear you, can you speak a little louder.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Now Reggie, you must know that VOIP can't possibly compete with ancient 2 copper wire and switchhouse technology where every connection you make degrades the signal! Or can it?? Legacy telephony solutions are narrowband, which seriously limits the achievable quality. Wideband codecs could potentially be used in digital telephone systems, but this has never been practical enough to gain any real interest. In fact, in traditional telephony applications, the speech bandwidth is restricted much more than the inherent limitations of narrowband coding. Typical telephony is band limited to 300 Hz to 3400 Hz. This bandwidth limitation explains why we are used to expect telephony speech to sound weak, unnatural, and lack crispness. Sound Sample 4: First: Speech sampled at 44.1 kHz. Second: Narrowband speech. Third: Telephony band speech. Most phone lines connected to a household are traditional two-wire copper cables. Pure digital connections are typically only found in enterprise environments. Due to poor connections or old wires, significant distortion is often generated in the analog part of the phone connection, a type of distortion that is entirely absent from VoIP implementations. The cordless phones so popular today also generate significant amounts of analog distortion due to radio interference and other implementation issues. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Dec 7, 7:11 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:24:14 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: The power of competition is amazing. I have been using Vonage for a few years, and can not tell the difference between Vonage and BellSouth except for the lower price and substantially more features offered by Vonage. Today, I got an offer in the mail from AT&T offering VOIP and similar features at the same price as Vonage. As long as Vonage continues to provides excellent service, I will not change, but it is nice to see the market place working. VOIP is a diaster waiting to happen and when it does, all you VOIP losers...er...users are going to be stuck with no way to communicate. You heard it here first. What, I can't hear you, can you speak a little louder.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Now Reggie, you must know that VOIP can't possibly compete with ancient 2 copper wire and switchhouse technology where every connection you make degrades the signal! Or can it?? Legacy telephony solutions are narrowband, which seriously limits the achievable quality. Wideband codecs could potentially be used in digital telephone systems, but this has never been practical enough to gain any real interest. In fact, in traditional telephony applications, the speech bandwidth is restricted much more than the inherent limitations of narrowband coding. Typical telephony is band limited to 300 Hz to 3400 Hz. This bandwidth limitation explains why we are used to expect telephony speech to sound weak, unnatural, and lack crispness. Sound Sample 4: First: Speech sampled at 44.1 kHz. Second: Narrowband speech. Third: Telephony band speech. Most phone lines connected to a household are traditional two-wire copper cables. Pure digital connections are typically only found in enterprise environments. Due to poor connections or old wires, significant distortion is often generated in the analog part of the phone connection, a type of distortion that is entirely absent from VoIP implementations. The cordless phones so popular today also generate significant amounts of analog distortion due to radio interference and other implementation issues. If you going to plagiarize something at least post the link to where the whole article can be read. For all users of VoIP to enjoy its full "capabilities", the Internet and all connections to it will have to be improved. It's no different than degraded copper lines used in POTS, the network must be up to the task. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. Bingo. |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. Why couldn't you use your cell phone? |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 2:56 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Dec 7, 7:11 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:24:14 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: The power of competition is amazing. I have been using Vonage for a few years, and can not tell the difference between Vonage and BellSouth except for the lower price and substantially more features offered by Vonage. Today, I got an offer in the mail from AT&T offering VOIP and similar features at the same price as Vonage. As long as Vonage continues to provides excellent service, I will not change, but it is nice to see the market place working. VOIP is a diaster waiting to happen and when it does, all you VOIP losers...er...users are going to be stuck with no way to communicate. You heard it here first. What, I can't hear you, can you speak a little louder.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Now Reggie, you must know that VOIP can't possibly compete with ancient 2 copper wire and switchhouse technology where every connection you make degrades the signal! Or can it?? Legacy telephony solutions are narrowband, which seriously limits the achievable quality. Wideband codecs could potentially be used in digital telephone systems, but this has never been practical enough to gain any real interest. In fact, in traditional telephony applications, the speech bandwidth is restricted much more than the inherent limitations of narrowband coding. Typical telephony is band limited to 300 Hz to 3400 Hz. This bandwidth limitation explains why we are used to expect telephony speech to sound weak, unnatural, and lack crispness. Sound Sample 4: First: Speech sampled at 44.1 kHz. Second: Narrowband speech. Third: Telephony band speech. Most phone lines connected to a household are traditional two-wire copper cables. Pure digital connections are typically only found in enterprise environments. Due to poor connections or old wires, significant distortion is often generated in the analog part of the phone connection, a type of distortion that is entirely absent from VoIP implementations. The cordless phones so popular today also generate significant amounts of analog distortion due to radio interference and other implementation issues. If you going to plagiarize something at least post the link to where the whole article can be read. Yeah, yeah.......... For all users of VoIP to enjoy its full "capabilities", the Internet and all connections to it will have to be improved. It's no different than degraded copper lines used in POTS, the network must be up to the task.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I agree. |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 3:03 pm, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message news:MZmdnUKGHs4SuMXanZ2dnUVZ_uDinZ2d@comcast. com... JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. Bingo.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I've never had a problem with my cell phone. Our area was without power for four days because of an ice storm three years ago. |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 3:28 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:05:16 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message news:MZmdnUKGHs4SuMXanZ2dnUVZ_uDinZ2d@comcast .com... JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. Why couldn't you use your cell phone? Cell sites need power to run, as well. They may have a small UPS, but that likely won't keep it operational for very long.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We was without power for four days in our area because of an ice storm, which by the way took phone lines out, too, and my cell phone worked the whole time. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|