Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#52
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#53
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:20:42 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: I'm telling you - the whole move to digital is going to lead to a diaster and a big one. I won't disagree. Everything's gone to hell since Morse was dropped. Well, something like that. And forget about EMP and solar activity. Me? Wife got me one of those flashlights that you shake to power it. So I'll be okay. But what about the children? --Vic |
#54
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 18:46:53 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote:
Let me tell you once again (for the 3rd time).........I could care less if VOIP dies. Until then, I will spend my $500 annually on more important things than overpaying MaBell. And i'll tell you again, for THE THIRD ****ING TIME, that isn't the issue. Jesus - how ****ing dense are you? |
#55
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#56
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:10:30 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 18:46:53 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Let me tell you once again (for the 3rd time).........I could care less if VOIP dies. Until then, I will spend my $500 annually on more important things than overpaying MaBell. And i'll tell you again, for THE THIRD ****ING TIME, that isn't the issue. Jesus - how ****ing dense are you? I apologise for my intemperate comments - I can't figure out how to cancel them. My sincerest apologies - seriously. :) |
#57
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:17:53 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:40:26 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:16:32 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:28:48 -0500, wrote: Why couldn't you use your cell phone? Cell sites need power to run, as well. They may have a small UPS, but that likely won't keep it operational for very long. I don't know the infrastructures, but when we had a 36 hour power/cable/cable phone outage a few months ago, the cell was fine. --Vic As I pointed out elsewhere, this could be due to something as simple as you being in range of a cell tower that was in an area that had power. Not so simple. I did a quick google and found that cell providers often have emergency generators to maintain service, and then of course as you said many power outages are local enough that cell provider isn't even affected. Ummm....no? In rural areas, like I live in, the system is generator to battery backup to...nothing. The max operating time is about 6 hours under emergency conditions. But that's not the issue. The issue is how the calls are distributed from the cell site to the land system. That's the vunerable point. The aquisition and distribution. Plus, a lot of the control points are done wirelessly by satellite - that's all digital. If that system fails for any number of reasons, you ain't gonna call no where. From what I read - again, it was cursory - the big issue with widespread power outages is that the cell service can get overwhelmed with calls, making getting a connection difficult. That is a concern becasue media outlets have contracts for blocks of cell channels which only leave so many left for the rest of us. OTOH, my Comcast phone was dead, dead, dead. Heh - proves the point eh what? |
#58
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:21:01 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:17:53 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:40:26 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:16:32 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:28:48 -0500, wrote: Why couldn't you use your cell phone? Cell sites need power to run, as well. They may have a small UPS, but that likely won't keep it operational for very long. I don't know the infrastructures, but when we had a 36 hour power/cable/cable phone outage a few months ago, the cell was fine. --Vic As I pointed out elsewhere, this could be due to something as simple as you being in range of a cell tower that was in an area that had power. Not so simple. I did a quick google and found that cell providers often have emergency generators to maintain service, and then of course as you said many power outages are local enough that cell provider isn't even affected. Ummm....no? In rural areas, like I live in, the system is generator to battery backup to...nothing. The max operating time is about 6 hours under emergency conditions. I haven't looked into local cell infrastructure, but can only say that for the 36 hour power outage, the cell worked for the entire period. The outage was pretty wide, affecting about half a million homes in my area. I don't know if my cell was generator powered or clear of the outage, but I didn't hear of widespread cell problems during the blackout. Maybe there were. But that's not the issue. The issue is how the calls are distributed from the cell site to the land system. That's the vunerable point. The aquisition and distribution. Plus, a lot of the control points are done wirelessly by satellite - that's all digital. If that system fails for any number of reasons, you ain't gonna call no where. From what I read - again, it was cursory - the big issue with widespread power outages is that the cell service can get overwhelmed with calls, making getting a connection difficult. That is a concern becasue media outlets have contracts for blocks of cell channels which only leave so many left for the rest of us. OTOH, my Comcast phone was dead, dead, dead. Heh - proves the point eh what? Sure does, and I've said I wish I had copper wire, which never failed all the years I had it. But I live with what I have now, and the cell proved reliable for the instance I mentioned. I agree about digital complexity leading to many failure points, but don't think we'll go back. Just the way the marketplace works. --Vic |
#59
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:01:17 -0800, "Calif Bill" wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. Use a cell phone! -- John H During some of the fires we have, the cellphone towers get isolated and no cell. During the earthquakes the cell either goes out or gets overloaded. And we have several seasons here in California. Mudslide, fire, riot, earthquake. |
#60
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 18:14:25 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:01:17 -0800, "Calif Bill" wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. Use a cell phone! -- John H During some of the fires we have, the cellphone towers get isolated and no cell. During the earthquakes the cell either goes out or gets overloaded. And we have several seasons here in California. Mudslide, fire, riot, earthquake. Those same things could easily take out a land line. -- John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Voip Updated Howto,Voip AT Home,Voip Phones,Voip Conference Calling | Cruising | |||
Voip Updated Howto,Voip AT Home,Voip Phones,Voip Conference Calling | General | |||
Voip at Home,Voip Updated Howto,New Voip Phones,Voip Conferencing, | Cruising | |||
Voip Updated Howto,Voip AT Home,Voip Phones,Voip Conference Calling | General | |||
Voip at Home,Voip Updated Howto,New Voip Phones,Voip Conferencing, | General |