Calif Bill wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 10, 11:35 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

.. first 1/2 was great
acting and some thought. Last 1/2 was both weird and no real conclusion.
How it gets critical acclaim as one of the best movies of the year is
either
because the rest of the crop is really bad, or there are different
criteria
used by the professional critics.


Sounds kind of like you're describing the 2008 Presidential race,
doesn't it...?

Not sure the first 1/2 has been any good either.

I supposed that's to be decided by the local critics.

I thought it was getting a bit cranmped around ehre....

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Are you saying the universe is contracting instead of expanding?


If so, OOOOHHHHHHH ****

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:35:09 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:18:22 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:03:57 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:12:17 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:02:57 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

If we let Harry keep going, he would quote every movie released in the
last year.
Greetings from The Future!!

Howdy Granpaw - how ya'll be?

Just a quick note: Bet the farm on BET THE FARM in the 2008 Kentucky
Derby. It's the basis of the family fortune.
I would do that, but I don't have a farm.
Well, you must have something because that's what the family fortune
was based on.
The family fortune is based upon screwing the little guy. Beating down
the humbled masses, taking from the poor to give to me, uses the poor
and then tossing them out in the gutter. You know typical righteous
righty stuff.

If you really were from the future, you would know that.
Yes - we are aware of that.

Which is why we are ashamed of you and want to change the viewpoint of
our family from the perspective of historical context.

If you refuse to bet the farm on BET THE FARM in this effort to change
historical context, then I guess we'll just have to...um...terminate
with extreme prejudice.
Here I am, give it your best try. I really don't care if I wipe out the
future, after all, I am a righteous righty. Now if you bump me off, you
will not exist. Now if I bump you off, I really won't care, you are
just the future of America.

Damn you people in the future must be drinking way too much kool-aid.
You are beginning to sound as stupid as the lame liberals.
Ah - I see you have no knowledge of the Fritz Lieber Time Paradox.

Simply put, nothing in the past will change future reality because the
future exists and the past doesn't.
Are you saying the universe is contracting instead of expanding?


If so, OOOOHHHHHHH ****

Compression builds heat.

Buy acorns now.

Should we start taxing BTUs? Is someone going to start a BTU trading
exchange?

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:40:37 -0500, BAR wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:35:09 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:18:22 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:03:57 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:12:17 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers XXI wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:02:57 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

If we let Harry keep going, he would quote every movie released in the
last year.
Greetings from The Future!!

Howdy Granpaw - how ya'll be?

Just a quick note: Bet the farm on BET THE FARM in the 2008 Kentucky
Derby. It's the basis of the family fortune.
I would do that, but I don't have a farm.
Well, you must have something because that's what the family fortune
was based on.
The family fortune is based upon screwing the little guy. Beating down
the humbled masses, taking from the poor to give to me, uses the poor
and then tossing them out in the gutter. You know typical righteous
righty stuff.

If you really were from the future, you would know that.
Yes - we are aware of that.

Which is why we are ashamed of you and want to change the viewpoint of
our family from the perspective of historical context.

If you refuse to bet the farm on BET THE FARM in this effort to change
historical context, then I guess we'll just have to...um...terminate
with extreme prejudice.
Here I am, give it your best try. I really don't care if I wipe out the
future, after all, I am a righteous righty. Now if you bump me off, you
will not exist. Now if I bump you off, I really won't care, you are
just the future of America.

Damn you people in the future must be drinking way too much kool-aid.
You are beginning to sound as stupid as the lame liberals.
Ah - I see you have no knowledge of the Fritz Lieber Time Paradox.

Simply put, nothing in the past will change future reality because the
future exists and the past doesn't.
Are you saying the universe is contracting instead of expanding?


If so, OOOOHHHHHHH ****

Compression builds heat.

Buy acorns now.

Should we start taxing BTUs? Is someone going to start a BTU trading
exchange?


You're way late:

"Regarding such a tax, Democrats already have some hard political
experience. In 1993, Vice President Al Gore convinced Bill Clinton to
propose an energy tax on BTU (British thermal units) usage. That would have
added about 12 cents a gallon to the price of gas. House Democrats walked
the plank and passed it, only to have Senate Democrats kill it. As much as
anything else, that vote cost Democrats control of the House in 1994. Now
Mr. Gore has embraced the carbon tax once again--though we still haven't
heard him endorse a direct tax on gas or consumers."

http://tinyurl.com/3e2caz


--
John H