| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
My dasughter asked me this last night and I realy didn't know how to
answer her. since the Russian Revoloution in 1917, and the overthrow of the Czar, the US refered to the C.C.C.P. an the "Reds". OK, where did the "Pinko" term come into effect? Was it the eventual Eastern Bloc nations? or say , Castro's Cuba? I'm curious, who were the "Pinko's? |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
Tim wrote:
My dasughter asked me this last night and I realy didn't know how to answer her. since the Russian Revoloution in 1917, and the overthrow of the Czar, the US refered to the C.C.C.P. an the "Reds". OK, where did the "Pinko" term come into effect? Was it the eventual Eastern Bloc nations? or say , Castro's Cuba? I'm curious, who were the "Pinko's? Pinko refers to any communist, as in "You Commie Pinko F*g" |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
Tim wrote:
My dasughter asked me this last night and I realy didn't know how to answer her. since the Russian Revoloution in 1917, and the overthrow of the Czar, the US refered to the C.C.C.P. an the "Reds". OK, where did the "Pinko" term come into effect? Was it the eventual Eastern Bloc nations? or say , Castro's Cuba? I'm curious, who were the "Pinko's? Communist sympathizers. It was a term used to describe anyone that was sympathetic to the communist or socialist cause, but wasn't actually a card carrying member of the communist party. Sort of a communist light term. It originally came from the term "parlor pinks" which was used back in the 20s and 30s to refer to the same sympathizers. Pink being a diluted version of red. -- Robert Allison Rimshot, Inc. Georgetown, TX |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
Robert Allison wrote: Tim wrote: My daughter asked me this last night and I realy didn't know how to answer her. since the Russian Revoloution in 1917, and the overthrow of the Czar, the US refered to the C.C.C.P. an the "Reds". OK, where did the "Pinko" term come into effect? Was it the eventual Eastern Bloc nations? or say , Castro's Cuba? I'm curious, who were the "Pinko's? Communist sympathizers. It was a term used to describe anyone that was sympathetic to the communist or socialist cause, but wasn't actually a card carrying member of the communist party. Sort of a communist light term. It originally came from the term "parlor pinks" which was used back in the 20s and 30s to refer to the same sympathizers. Pink being a diluted version of red. -- Robert Allison Rimshot, Inc. Georgetown, TX Robert, you answered a question that I should have also posted. the sympathaizers living in a free society with communistic views. "parlor pinks" I've never heard that phrase before. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
"Tim" wrote in message
... Robert Allison wrote: Tim wrote: My daughter asked me this last night and I realy didn't know how to answer her. since the Russian Revoloution in 1917, and the overthrow of the Czar, the US refered to the C.C.C.P. an the "Reds". OK, where did the "Pinko" term come into effect? Was it the eventual Eastern Bloc nations? or say , Castro's Cuba? I'm curious, who were the "Pinko's? Communist sympathizers. It was a term used to describe anyone that was sympathetic to the communist or socialist cause, but wasn't actually a card carrying member of the communist party. Sort of a communist light term. It originally came from the term "parlor pinks" which was used back in the 20s and 30s to refer to the same sympathizers. Pink being a diluted version of red. -- Robert Allison Rimshot, Inc. Georgetown, TX Robert, you answered a question that I should have also posted. the sympathaizers living in a free society with communistic views. Communism doesn't strictly require a "non-free" society. It's just that nobody's really managed to pull off any of the economic tricks *without* screwing with people's freedoms. I'm a bit rusty on this, but I believe Tito thought he could make socialism work in Yugoslavia without involving the evils he saw in the USSR & China. A quick google search for "tito yugoslavia" reveals a vast amount of disagreement about whether he succeeded or not. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
On Feb 29, 10:43*am, Tim wrote:
Robert Allison wrote: Tim wrote: My daughter asked me this last night and I realy didn't know how to answer her. since the Russian Revoloution in 1917, and the overthrow of the Czar, the US refered to the C.C.C.P. an the "Reds". OK, where did the "Pinko" term come into effect? Was it the eventual Eastern Bloc nations? or say , Castro's Cuba? I'm curious, who were the "Pinko's? Communist sympathizers. It was a term used to describe anyone that was sympathetic to the communist or socialist cause, but wasn't actually a card carrying member of the communist party. *Sort of a communist light term. It originally came from the term "parlor pinks" which was used back in the 20s and 30s to refer to the same sympathizers. *Pink being a diluted version of red. -- Robert Allison Rimshot, Inc. Georgetown, TX Robert, you answered a question that I should have also posted. the sympathaizers living in a free society with communistic views. "parlor pinks" *I've never heard that phrase before.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Parlor Pinks? Is that kind of like our Limosine Liberals? Sounds like the same kind of psudo-intellectuals we have sitting in coffee shops and DNC offices now...  |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: I'm a bit rusty on this, but I believe Tito thought he could make socialism work in Yugoslavia without involving the evils he saw in the USSR & China. A quick google search for "tito yugoslavia" reveals a vast amount of disagreement about whether he succeeded or not. Evidently he didn't do too good of a job at his attempt. If I rememebr correctly, Wasn't he proven to be one of the most corrupt of Eastern bloc dictators..? |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
"Tim" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: I'm a bit rusty on this, but I believe Tito thought he could make socialism work in Yugoslavia without involving the evils he saw in the USSR & China. A quick google search for "tito yugoslavia" reveals a vast amount of disagreement about whether he succeeded or not. Evidently he didn't do too good of a job at his attempt. If I rememebr correctly, Wasn't he proven to be one of the most corrupt of Eastern bloc dictators..? Like I said, I'm rusty on the subject. But, corruption isn't the point, since our economic and political system is also rife with corrupt characters, some of whom make no effort to hide it. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: Like I said, I'm rusty on the subject. But, corruption isn't the point, since our economic and political system is also rife with corrupt characters, some of whom make no effort to hide it. Well, to a degree it actually is. When you are supposed to develop a working class euphoria and end up being one of the "have all's" and everybody else is a "have not". I really wouldn't say thats a good form of leading by example. But true, I suppose we do have more than our share of bilkers. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"
"Tim" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: Like I said, I'm rusty on the subject. But, corruption isn't the point, since our economic and political system is also rife with corrupt characters, some of whom make no effort to hide it. Well, to a degree it actually is. When you are supposed to develop a working class euphoria and end up being one of the "have all's" and everybody else is a "have not". I really wouldn't say thats a good form of leading by example. But true, I suppose we do have more than our share of bilkers. Be prepared to puke: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/us...th&oref=slogin |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
