Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry.
Well, not really. Bush ‘envious’ of troops’ ‘romantic’ work in Afghanistan Posted March 14th, 2008 at 11:08 am http://tinyurl.com/2vlgw9 From the Carpetblogger: I really wish the president wouldn’t say things like this. In a videoconference, Bush heard from U.S. military and civilian personnel [in Afghanistan] about the challenges ranging from fighting local government and police corruption to persuading farmers to abandon a lucrative poppy drug trade for other crops. […] “I must say, I’m a little envious,” Bush said. “If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed.” “It must be exciting for you … in some ways romantic, in some ways, you know, confronting danger. You’re really making history, and thanks,” Bush said. Bush periodically talks about how much he wishes he could put on a military uniform and fight in one (or both) of the wars he began. The last time was in September, when the president told a group of conservative milbloggers that he envies U.S. troops in Iraq, and said he’d like to be serving alongside them. He can’t, he said, because, “One, I’m too old to be out there, and two, they would notice me.” It’s likely that Bush thinks these kinds of remarks are good for troop morale. If the commander in chief wishes he could fight on the front lines personally, they must be part of a worthwhile mission. But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. James Joyner noted: My immediate, cynical reaction was that this it is an easy thing to say, if not insulting to those enduring great hardship and danger. Certainly, it’s an impolitic thing to say, since it will immediately raise questions about his actions when he was young and free to go off to war. Some of the soldiers and Marines — and probably all of the civilians — likely had the same reaction. Now, Joyner went on to more or less reject this cynicism, but I’m afraid I have a less forgiving attitude. Bush can talk now about the “romantic” work of serving multiple tours and fighting on the front lines of years-long wars. If only he were younger and unemployed. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Far more offensively, he’s badly mismanaged two wars as president, and over-stretched our fighting forces to the breaking point. Maybe this is a subject Bush could just avoid? Please? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're right, Harry. you just can't help it.
HK wrote: Sorry. Well, not really. Bush ?envious? of troops? ?romantic? work in Afghanistan Posted March 14th, 2008 at 11:08 am http://tinyurl.com/2vlgw9 From the Carpetblogger: I really wish the president wouldn?t say things like this. In a videoconference, Bush heard from U.S. military and civilian personnel [in Afghanistan] about the challenges ranging from fighting local government and police corruption to persuading farmers to abandon a lucrative poppy drug trade for other crops. [?] ?I must say, I?m a little envious,? Bush said. ?If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed.? ?It must be exciting for you ? in some ways romantic, in some ways, you know, confronting danger. You?re really making history, and thanks,? Bush said. Bush periodically talks about how much he wishes he could put on a military uniform and fight in one (or both) of the wars he began. The last time was in September, when the president told a group of conservative milbloggers that he envies U.S. troops in Iraq, and said he?d like to be serving alongside them. He can?t, he said, because, ?One, I?m too old to be out there, and two, they would notice me.? It?s likely that Bush thinks these kinds of remarks are good for troop morale. If the commander in chief wishes he could fight on the front lines personally, they must be part of a worthwhile mission. But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. James Joyner noted: My immediate, cynical reaction was that this it is an easy thing to say, if not insulting to those enduring great hardship and danger. Certainly, it?s an impolitic thing to say, since it will immediately raise questions about his actions when he was young and free to go off to war. Some of the soldiers and Marines ? and probably all of the civilians ? likely had the same reaction. Now, Joyner went on to more or less reject this cynicism, but I?m afraid I have a less forgiving attitude. Bush can talk now about the ?romantic? work of serving multiple tours and fighting on the front lines of years-long wars. If only he were younger and unemployed. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Far more offensively, he?s badly mismanaged two wars as president, and over-stretched our fighting forces to the breaking point. Maybe this is a subject Bush could just avoid? Please? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
You're right, Harry. you just can't help it. HK wrote: Sorry. Well, not really. Bush ?envious? of troops? ?romantic? work in Afghanistan Posted March 14th, 2008 at 11:08 am http://tinyurl.com/2vlgw9 From the Carpetblogger: I really wish the president wouldn?t say things like this. In a videoconference, Bush heard from U.S. military and civilian personnel [in Afghanistan] about the challenges ranging from fighting local government and police corruption to persuading farmers to abandon a lucrative poppy drug trade for other crops. [?] ?I must say, I?m a little envious,? Bush said. ?If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed.? ?It must be exciting for you ? in some ways romantic, in some ways, you know, confronting danger. You?re really making history, and thanks,? Bush said. Bush periodically talks about how much he wishes he could put on a military uniform and fight in one (or both) of the wars he began. The last time was in September, when the president told a group of conservative milbloggers that he envies U.S. troops in Iraq, and said he?d like to be serving alongside them. He can?t, he said, because, ?One, I?m too old to be out there, and two, they would notice me.? It?s likely that Bush thinks these kinds of remarks are good for troop morale. If the commander in chief wishes he could fight on the front lines personally, they must be part of a worthwhile mission. But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. James Joyner noted: My immediate, cynical reaction was that this it is an easy thing to say, if not insulting to those enduring great hardship and danger. Certainly, it?s an impolitic thing to say, since it will immediately raise questions about his actions when he was young and free to go off to war. Some of the soldiers and Marines ? and probably all of the civilians ? likely had the same reaction. Now, Joyner went on to more or less reject this cynicism, but I?m afraid I have a less forgiving attitude. Bush can talk now about the ?romantic? work of serving multiple tours and fighting on the front lines of years-long wars. If only he were younger and unemployed. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Far more offensively, he?s badly mismanaged two wars as president, and over-stretched our fighting forces to the breaking point. Maybe this is a subject Bush could just avoid? Please? I know...but Bush is *such* a stunatz... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HK" wrote in message
... Sorry. Well, not really. Bush ‘envious’ of troops’ ‘romantic’ work in Afghanistan Posted March 14th, 2008 at 11:08 am http://tinyurl.com/2vlgw9 From the Carpetblogger: I really wish the president wouldn’t say things like this. In a videoconference, Bush heard from U.S. military and civilian personnel [in Afghanistan] about the challenges ranging from fighting local government and police corruption to persuading farmers to abandon a lucrative poppy drug trade for other crops. […] “I must say, I’m a little envious,” Bush said. “If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed.” Oh crap. Not the "young democracy" bull**** again. His staff (or wife) needs to slap him around and make him forget that word combination. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Harry, you had a chance to serve and chose not to. Harry, you were young and unemployed, at least part of that time that there was a war going on, and you chose to pull strings and or take advantage of family connections to avoid serving your country. Harry, how can you sit in front of your computer and punch out such garbage. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in message
... "HK" wrote in message ... But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Harry, you had a chance to serve and chose not to. Harry, you were young and unemployed, at least part of that time that there was a war going on, and you chose to pull strings and or take advantage of family connections to avoid serving your country. Harry, how can you sit in front of your computer and punch out such garbage. OK, but what do you think of Bush's comments to the troops? Or, are we not going to focus on actual content today? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Harry, you had a chance to serve and chose not to. Harry, you were young and unemployed, at least part of that time that there was a war going on, and you chose to pull strings and or take advantage of family connections to avoid serving your country. Harry, how can you sit in front of your computer and punch out such garbage. Actually, FLEEG, I did serve, but not in any way you could comprehend, and I was never unemployed. Even when I was in college, I had part-time jobs during semesters, and full-time jobs in the summer. If only you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, eh? If you have children, I feel sorrow for the DNA they inherited from you. It'll be a handicap their entire lives. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Harry, you had a chance to serve and chose not to. Harry, you were young and unemployed, at least part of that time that there was a war going on, and you chose to pull strings and or take advantage of family connections to avoid serving your country. Harry, how can you sit in front of your computer and punch out such garbage. Actually, FLEEG, I did serve, but not in any way you could comprehend, and I was never unemployed. Even when I was in college, I had part-time jobs during semesters, and full-time jobs in the summer. If only you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, eh? If you have children, I feel sorrow for the DNA they inherited from you. It'll be a handicap their entire lives. More lies! |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Harry, you had a chance to serve and chose not to. Harry, you were young and unemployed, at least part of that time that there was a war going on, and you chose to pull strings and or take advantage of family connections to avoid serving your country. Harry, how can you sit in front of your computer and punch out such garbage. Actually, FLEEG, I did serve, but not in any way you could comprehend, and I was never unemployed. Even when I was in college, I had part-time jobs during semesters, and full-time jobs in the summer. You served yourself. You ran away and hid when your country called. If only you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, eh? If you have children, I feel sorrow for the DNA they inherited from you. It'll be a handicap their entire lives. Most of us know the relationship between our asses and holes in the ground. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BAR" wrote in message
. .. HK wrote: wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... But seeing these remarks, more than once, simply reminds me that when Bush had a chance to serve, he chose not to do his duty. But he was younger and unemployed, there was a war underway that he said he believed in, and he chose to pull strings, take advantage of family connections, and then neglect to even complete his obligations to the National Guard. Harry, you had a chance to serve and chose not to. Harry, you were young and unemployed, at least part of that time that there was a war going on, and you chose to pull strings and or take advantage of family connections to avoid serving your country. Harry, how can you sit in front of your computer and punch out such garbage. Actually, FLEEG, I did serve, but not in any way you could comprehend, and I was never unemployed. Even when I was in college, I had part-time jobs during semesters, and full-time jobs in the summer. You served yourself. You ran away and hid when your country called. If only you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, eh? If you have children, I feel sorrow for the DNA they inherited from you. It'll be a handicap their entire lives. Most of us know the relationship between our asses and holes in the ground. Since words are extremely important, do you have any thoughts on the original subject of this thread, i.e.: what Bush said to the troops and his exact choice (?) of words? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I'm sorry Chuck, I couldn't resist... | General |