On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:44:11 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:25:59 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:46:26 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:50:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Mar 29, 1:03 pm, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
HK wrote:
You ought to head to the Soylent Green depot and turn yourself
in.
Harry, are you hungry?
No offense to JohnH but that was hillarious. I about fell off the
chair when I saw that.
It kinda gave me the same reaction when you called Reggie "four-
feathers" Smithers.
Harry really is a great guy who deserves all the praise he can
get.
It would be nice though, if he had a high regard for the lives of
both born
and unborn babies.
Unborn babies!!!!

Hahahahahahaha.

Right wing palaver.

I don't give a damn about the "unborn." My concern is for the
children
who are already here and who get the short end of the stick from
self-righteous, ant-abortion righties.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Hut, Harry, you were "unborn" once.
As were the rest of us! He seems to forget that five minutes before
we
got
spanked, we were all the 'unborn' he doesn't give a damn about!.
You know, if you guys just ignored him, he'd eventually go away.

We just can not do that. Just like when in Costa Rica a couple of
weeks
ago. On a jungle walk, a pit viper was curled up in a small tree. I
think they called it a Palm Viper. Took all my self control and stern
looks from SWMBO to stop me from antagonizing it with the 6' stick I
had.


Sorry, but I am not a subscriber to the extreme right wing philosophy of
caring for fetuses, but not giving a damn about the children already
here.
Oh...if you are such a support of "right to life," I presume you are
also
against the death penalty and the killing of non-combatants in war, too,
right?

No, I didn't think so.


You are clueless about me, as well as clueless about life.


Harry has a hard time sticking to one subject, as do most liberals. Once
they start receiving negative vibes for their positions, they simply
change
the subject.

I wonder if he told his wife, "It's not a baby kicking, dear, it's just a
fetus."


--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)

Harry is not a liberal. He is a egotistical person only concerned about HK.


I still wonder if that's what he said to his wife before his kids were
born.
--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:25:59 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:46:26 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:50:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Mar 29, 1:03 pm, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
HK wrote:
You ought to head to the Soylent Green depot and turn yourself
in.
Harry, are you hungry?
No offense to JohnH but that was hillarious. I about fell off
the
chair when I saw that.
It kinda gave me the same reaction when you called Reggie
"four-
feathers" Smithers.
Harry really is a great guy who deserves all the praise he can
get.
It would be nice though, if he had a high regard for the lives
of
both born
and unborn babies.
Unborn babies!!!!

Hahahahahahaha.

Right wing palaver.

I don't give a damn about the "unborn." My concern is for the
children
who are already here and who get the short end of the stick from
self-righteous, ant-abortion righties.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Hut, Harry, you were "unborn" once.
As were the rest of us! He seems to forget that five minutes before
we
got
spanked, we were all the 'unborn' he doesn't give a damn about!.
You know, if you guys just ignored him, he'd eventually go away.
We just can not do that. Just like when in Costa Rica a couple of
weeks
ago. On a jungle walk, a pit viper was curled up in a small tree. I
think they called it a Palm Viper. Took all my self control and
stern
looks from SWMBO to stop me from antagonizing it with the 6' stick I
had.

Sorry, but I am not a subscriber to the extreme right wing philosophy
of
caring for fetuses, but not giving a damn about the children already
here.
Oh...if you are such a support of "right to life," I presume you are
also
against the death penalty and the killing of non-combatants in war,
too,
right?

No, I didn't think so.

You are clueless about me, as well as clueless about life.

Harry has a hard time sticking to one subject, as do most liberals. Once
they start receiving negative vibes for their positions, they simply
change
the subject.

I wonder if he told his wife, "It's not a baby kicking, dear, it's just
a
fetus."


--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)

Harry is not a liberal. He is a egotistical person only concerned about
HK.


You may be right. I probably am much more of a real conservative, but,
unlike today's conservatives, I believe in the Constitution, I believe in
the separation of church and state, I believe a president should not lie
us into a war, I believe a president should not blow the federal budget. I
believe in the right to privacy, I believe in habeas corpus, and I believe
Dick Cheney should be impeached, tried, removed from office, and then
indicted and tried for treason.

Silly conservative am I.

You believe in little of that. Otherwise you would have railed against all
those Democrats that added billions in Earmarks to the spending bills.
Where were the rails against Clinton when he violated the Constitution and
Federal laws?