Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interest in Windows XP's longevity has been driven by several factors,
including the approaching June 30 deadline and the imminent release of another service pack, but the biggest reason users seem to want XP to live is a general reluctance to upgrade to Windows Vista. If you want to continue using XP, what problems will you face? If you buy a PC with Vista installed and decide you want XP instead, what are your options? Earlier this week, Forrester Research Inc. released results of monthly surveys during 2007 that polled more than 50,000 enterprise computer users. According to the surveys, Windows XP usage remained constant throughout the year at slightly over 89% of all Windows users in businesses. Windows Vista, meanwhile, grew from nearly nothing to just over 6%, but it appeared to get its gains at the expense of Windows 2000, not the dominant Windows XP. A Forrester researcher said the data hinted that companies might hang onto Windows XP until the next iteration, Windows 7, is available in late 2009 or early 2010, skipping Vista altogether. Gartenberg acknowledged the pressure to push out XP's drop-dead date came from Vista's troubles. "In the past, you could argue that the latest and greatest from Microsoft was better. But for many people and businesses, that just doesn't fly this time. Excert from: http://www.computerworld.com/action/...leId=9074 379 |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Interest in Windows XP's longevity... assuredly is higher than the interest in yours. Someday, crap-for-brains, perhaps you'll something of consequence and on topic to this newsgroup. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Interest in Windows XP's longevity... assuredly is higher than the interest in yours. Someday, crap-for-brains, perhaps you'll something of consequence and on topic to this newsgroup. Slow down Buzz. It would help if you formed complete sentences. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Interest in Windows XP's longevity... assuredly is higher than the interest in yours. Someday, crap-for-brains, perhaps you'll something of consequence and on topic to this newsgroup. Slow down Buzz. It would help if you formed complete sentences. Same for you, crap-for-brains, jr. Neither of you post on topic often and never post anything of consequence. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
Same for you, crap-for-brains, jr. Neither of you post on topic often and never post anything of consequence. Hey Krausie, please try to keep in mind that no one here has the vast boating experience that you have (ie: sailing from CA to Hawaii, rounding Cape Horn, tranversing the Panama Canal, owning a Hatteras. owning a lobster boat, etc, etc, etc.). So a little patience and tolerance for those of us with a tad less experience would be in order. Cheers, Old Boy. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message . .. Jim wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Interest in Windows XP's longevity... assuredly is higher than the interest in yours. Someday, crap-for-brains, perhaps you'll something of consequence and on topic to this newsgroup. Slow down Buzz. It would help if you formed complete sentences. Same for you, crap-for-brains, jr. Neither of you post on topic often and never post anything of consequence. Where did you learn such language Buzz? Your mom or dad, perhaps? Your friends and associates? Your Wife? The boys at the corner bar? Coworkers? Gentlemen don't speak that kind of language in public. But, of course, a Yale man would know that; wouldn't he? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Interest in Windows XP's longevity... assuredly is higher than the interest in yours. Someday, crap-for-brains, perhaps you'll something of consequence and on topic to this newsgroup. I think you meant to include the word "post" in there. Try harder and you will do better. Proper sentence structure is best left for the educated. Now, weren't *you* the one with all of those OT posts about computers and your OS? Yes, you were! We learned all about Vista and Macs from your *years* of expertise. Feel like an idiot yet? No? Maybe your medication is working. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're a fricking nut case.
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message ... Interest in Windows XP's longevity has been driven by several factors, including the approaching June 30 deadline and the imminent release of another service pack, but the biggest reason users seem to want XP to live is a general reluctance to upgrade to Windows Vista. If you want to continue using XP, what problems will you face? If you buy a PC with Vista installed and decide you want XP instead, what are your options? Earlier this week, Forrester Research Inc. released results of monthly surveys during 2007 that polled more than 50,000 enterprise computer users. According to the surveys, Windows XP usage remained constant throughout the year at slightly over 89% of all Windows users in businesses. Windows Vista, meanwhile, grew from nearly nothing to just over 6%, but it appeared to get its gains at the expense of Windows 2000, not the dominant Windows XP. A Forrester researcher said the data hinted that companies might hang onto Windows XP until the next iteration, Windows 7, is available in late 2009 or early 2010, skipping Vista altogether. Gartenberg acknowledged the pressure to push out XP's drop-dead date came from Vista's troubles. "In the past, you could argue that the latest and greatest from Microsoft was better. But for many people and businesses, that just doesn't fly this time. Excert from: http://www.computerworld.com/action/...leId=9074 379 |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jamesgangnc wrote:
You're a fricking nut case. "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message ... Interest in Windows XP's longevity has been driven by several factors, including the approaching June 30 deadline and the imminent release of another service pack, but the biggest reason users seem to want XP to live is a general reluctance to upgrade to Windows Vista. If you want to continue using XP, what problems will you face? If you buy a PC with Vista installed and decide you want XP instead, what are your options? Earlier this week, Forrester Research Inc. released results of monthly surveys during 2007 that polled more than 50,000 enterprise computer users. According to the surveys, Windows XP usage remained constant throughout the year at slightly over 89% of all Windows users in businesses. Windows Vista, meanwhile, grew from nearly nothing to just over 6%, but it appeared to get its gains at the expense of Windows 2000, not the dominant Windows XP. A Forrester researcher said the data hinted that companies might hang onto Windows XP until the next iteration, Windows 7, is available in late 2009 or early 2010, skipping Vista altogether. Gartenberg acknowledged the pressure to push out XP's drop-dead date came from Vista's troubles. "In the past, you could argue that the latest and greatest from Microsoft was better. But for many people and businesses, that just doesn't fly this time. Excert from: http://www.computerworld.com/action/...leId=9074 379 "Reggie" likes to pretend he knows something about computers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|